Home » Due Process » Page 2

When Family Court Leaves the Courtroom

The article highlights the risks parents face in private judging during family court proceedings, often unaware of its binding nature. Many experience significant pressure and confusion, leading to irreversible agreements without fully understanding the consequences. It emphasizes the need for clarity and proper legal guidance before consenting to such processes.

When Family Court Leaves the Courtroom Read More

Hornbeck’s Panic Play: Motion to Dismiss Filed Days After Deposition Raised Questions About Basis for Criminal Charges

Sarah Hornbeck has filed a Motion to Dismiss in the federal case Reichert v. Hornbeck after a deposition where she faltered under questioning regarding the evidence for her criminal charges against ex-husband Jeff Reichert. Critics claim her motion is a desperate attempt to avoid accountability in a long custody battle that alienated Reichert from their son.

Hornbeck’s Panic Play: Motion to Dismiss Filed Days After Deposition Raised Questions About Basis for Criminal Charges Read More

Is There a Real Problem at DHS, or Just Partisan Defiance?

Recent federal court rulings criticize the Department of Homeland Security and Immigration and Customs Enforcement for constitutional violations, notably obstructing detainees’ access to legal counsel. This governmental overreach raises concerns regarding accountability and legal compliance. Both sides of the political spectrum must address these institutional issues to uphold the rule of law effectively.

Is There a Real Problem at DHS, or Just Partisan Defiance? Read More

The Public Has a Right to Know Whether Government Agencies Followed the Law Before Taking Someone’s Freedom.

Los Angeles and San Diego officials are withholding public records related to the prosecution of Giselle Farias Smiel, raising concerns about transparency and due process. Despite legal obligations under the California Public Records Act, agencies have issued denials and delays, undermining public trust and accountability in the justice system.

The Public Has a Right to Know Whether Government Agencies Followed the Law Before Taking Someone’s Freedom. Read More

California’s Criminal Courts Are Using Protective Orders to Hide Evidence — and No One Is Stopping Them

California’s criminal courts are increasingly using protective orders to restrict defendants’ access to evidence, undermining due process. Overwhelmed public defenders are forced to accept these orders, harming defendants’ rights to prepare their defense. This systemic issue risks wrongful convictions and highlights a need for reform to restore transparency and accountability in the legal system.

California’s Criminal Courts Are Using Protective Orders to Hide Evidence — and No One Is Stopping Them Read More

Justice Cannot Be Blind to Invisible Disabilities

Maryland courts are increasingly denying ADA accommodation requests for individuals with invisible disabilities, leading to severe consequences. Judges are making medical determinations without proper evaluations, overshadowing federal law. This systemic failure calls for reforms including empowered ADA coordinators, necessary written responses, independent oversight, and better judicial training to honor ADA rights effectively.

Justice Cannot Be Blind to Invisible Disabilities Read More

Inside People v. Smiel: When Process Becomes the Story

Giselle Smiel faces five felonies, including kidnapping, for picking up her crying child at a San Diego school. Her defense argues there was no force or substantial movement, pointing to lack of evidence and jurisdictional issues. Advocates highlight constitutional violations and ADA neglect in her arrest, seeking dismissal of charges and oversight on family-court mechanisms in criminal cases.

Inside People v. Smiel: When Process Becomes the Story Read More

The Hidden Market in Broken Homes: How Family Courts Became a Profit Center

The article by Michael Phillips argues that family courts and child welfare systems have evolved into profit-driven industries, prioritizing revenue over family stability. Federal laws like Title IV-D and Title IV-E incentivize conflict and child removal, creating a cycle of dependency and trauma for families. Reform is essential to shift these damaging incentives.

The Hidden Market in Broken Homes: How Family Courts Became a Profit Center Read More