Home » Custody Disputes

Tag: Custody Disputes
3 - Investigations / 4 - Cases / Child Custody / Child Custody / Child Support / Child Support / Child Trafficking / Child Welfare / Family Court / Family Court Reform / Government / Maryland Watch / The Reichert Files

Nobody Asked Grant

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Grant Reichert’s communication has been restricted by his mother, Sarah Hornbeck, and John Michel, resulting in a protective order against him without his consent. Supervised visitation has become difficult, raising concerns about his well-being. Witness testimonies suggest he desires contact with his father. Ongoing litigation raises questions about manipulation and parental control dynamics.

Nobody Asked Grant Read More
2 - Analysis / Business / Child Custody / Child Custody / Child Support / Child Support / Economy & Policy / Family Court / Government / Government / National Policy / Policy / Politics / Travel

The Federal Government Will Ground You for Unpaid Child Support. It Has No Answer for Stolen Parenting Time.

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The Trump administration has activated a policy allowing passport revocation for parents owing over $2,500 in child support, impacting both responsible and negligent parents alike. This enforcement does not account for circumstances like ongoing custody battles, potentially harming parents who are fighting for access to their children rather than abandoning them.

The Federal Government Will Ground You for Unpaid Child Support. It Has No Answer for Stolen Parenting Time. Read More
2 - Analysis / 3 - Investigations / Circuit Court / Civil Court / Civil Rights / Civil Rights / Court Corruption / Court Reform / Domestic Policy / Family Court / Family Court Reform / Government / Institutions / Institutions & Accountability / Justice & Governance / Maryland / Maryland Watch

No One Is Watching: How Montgomery County’s Family Court Operates Without External Oversight, and What Happens to the People Who Notice

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

An investigation reveals a significant accountability gap in Maryland’s family court system, where civil rights complaints against judges lack external oversight and transparency. Complaints filed are often sealed and unreported, leading to systemic noncompliance without recourse for litigants. This raises critical issues about judicial accountability and the structures that enable potential misconduct.

No One Is Watching: How Montgomery County’s Family Court Operates Without External Oversight, and What Happens to the People Who Notice Read More
3 - Investigations / 4 - Cases / Child Abuse / Child Custody / Child Custody / Child Welfare / Court Corruption / Family Court / Family Court Reform / Government Corruption / Institutions / Legal Reform / New York / New York Watch / The Fishman Files

They’re Adults Now. He Still Can’t Call Them.

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Marc Fishman’s children are no longer caught in a custody battle — they’re adults. And yet the silence remains. His case exposes a reality rarely discussed: when parental alienation succeeds, it doesn’t end. It becomes permanent.

They’re Adults Now. He Still Can’t Call Them. Read More
3 - Investigations / 4 - Cases / Brenna Gano Case / California / California Watch / Child Custody / Court Corruption / Family Court / Family Court Reform / Institutions / The California Custody Cartel

The ‘Mom Yells’ Playbook

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

A two-word claim — “mom yells” — became the foundation for a seven-year custody battle that ended in total estrangement. This investigation traces how a narrative, once introduced into the family court system, can be repeated, reinforced, and ultimately weaponized until it replaces documented reality.

The ‘Mom Yells’ Playbook Read More
3 - Investigations / 4 - Cases / California / California Watch / Court Corruption / Family Court Reform / Institutions / The Reyna Files

The Mother the System Called the Problem

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

On Parental Alienation Awareness Day, Rhonda Reyna’s story exposes a disturbing inversion inside the family court system: the very label meant to protect children from manipulation is increasingly used against the parent raising legitimate safety concerns. As documented warnings go ignored and protective actions are reframed as “alienation,” the system meant to safeguard families instead becomes the mechanism separating them.

The Mother the System Called the Problem Read More
3 - Investigations / 4 - Cases / Brenna Gano Case / California / California Watch / Court Corruption / Family Court Reform / Institutions / The California Custody Cartel

Inside the California Custody Cartel

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Brenna Gano’s experience in California’s family court highlights a troubling system where justice is influenced by financial interests. Misled and pressured into signing agreements, she faced excessive costs and neurological biases that labeled her as unstable. Her case exemplifies a broader pattern of exploitation for profit within family court practices, jeopardizing families’ well-being.

Inside the California Custody Cartel Read More
3 - Investigations / 4 - Cases / Brenna Gano Case / California / Family Court / Family Court Reform / Institutions

When Family Court Leaves the Courtroom

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The article highlights the risks parents face in private judging during family court proceedings, often unaware of its binding nature. Many experience significant pressure and confusion, leading to irreversible agreements without fully understanding the consequences. It emphasizes the need for clarity and proper legal guidance before consenting to such processes.

When Family Court Leaves the Courtroom Read More
3 - Investigations / The Reichert Files / Uncategorized

When Institutions Pick a Parent

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

A federal lawsuit in Maryland challenges how private schools manage parental custody disputes, focusing on Concordia Preparatory School’s alleged improper involvement in a custody conflict. The case raises critical questions about school responsibilities in such matters, particularly surrounding the enforcement of unserved protective orders and how institutions handle conflicting parental claims.

When Institutions Pick a Parent Read More
Connecticut / Family Court / Family Court Reform / Father's Rights / Misconduct / New York

From Custody to Conviction: The Nicholas Hall Case and the High Cost of Family-Court Weaponization

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Nicholas Hall, serving a 21-year prison sentence in Connecticut, was convicted amid a contentious custody battle. His supporters claim the charges stemmed from manipulative tactics by his ex-wife, supported by politically connected families. Advocates argue for systemic reforms to ensure fair trials and broaden access to critical evidence, emphasizing injustices in family-court linked prosecutions.

From Custody to Conviction: The Nicholas Hall Case and the High Cost of Family-Court Weaponization Read More