Home » Topics » Family Court » Parental Rights

THE MONTHS NOBODY MENTIONS

June highlights important issues like National Men’s Health Month and National PTSD Awareness Month, yet conversations around men’s health and the impact of family courts remain largely ignored. Men face significant mental health challenges, particularly related to trauma from family court experiences, but lack adequate cultural acknowledgment and support.

THE MONTHS NOBODY MENTIONS Read More

The Gatekeeper

Brenna Gano alleges that Samantha Esver-Poon, a Family Court Services counselor in San Mateo County, fabricated agreements and neglected evidence, leading to her estrangement from her son Jacob. Despite ongoing complaints, including violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act, Esver-Poon remains employed, and the county has yet to address the allegations.

The Gatekeeper Read More

Disabled Father’s Explosive ADA Lawsuit Slams Maryland Court for Systemic Discrimination—Will AG Brown Defend the Indefensible?

Disabled veteran Jeff Reichert’s federal lawsuit against the Anne Arundel County Circuit Court reveals alleged systematic discrimination and retaliation in his custody battle. Despite his disabilities, the court denied reasonable accommodations required under the ADA, raising significant concerns about bias and access to justice within Maryland’s family court system.

Disabled Father’s Explosive ADA Lawsuit Slams Maryland Court for Systemic Discrimination—Will AG Brown Defend the Indefensible? Read More

Hornbeck’s Panic Play: Motion to Dismiss Filed Days After Deposition Raised Questions About Basis for Criminal Charges

Sarah Hornbeck has filed a Motion to Dismiss in the federal case Reichert v. Hornbeck after a deposition where she faltered under questioning regarding the evidence for her criminal charges against ex-husband Jeff Reichert. Critics claim her motion is a desperate attempt to avoid accountability in a long custody battle that alienated Reichert from their son.

Hornbeck’s Panic Play: Motion to Dismiss Filed Days After Deposition Raised Questions About Basis for Criminal Charges Read More

Weaponized FAP: How DoD’s Family Court Ends Careers and Families — Without a Trial

The Family Advocacy Program (FAP) within the military is critiqued for lacking due process, as it allows decisions on allegations to be made without the accused’s presence or counsel. This system, coupled with a high “met criteria” rate, has severe consequences on service members’ careers and well-being, often leading to irreversible harm.

Weaponized FAP: How DoD’s Family Court Ends Careers and Families — Without a Trial Read More

Supervised Visitation in Westchester County: A Probation-Run Program That Proves False Arrest

In 2018, Marc Fishman was falsely arrested during a supervised visitation with his son, igniting a lawsuit over civil rights and disability discrimination. Under Westchester County policy, his probation officer was present, but law enforcement acted without her approval, highlighting systemic issues in the county’s handling of supervised visitation and civil rights violations.

Supervised Visitation in Westchester County: A Probation-Run Program That Proves False Arrest Read More

The Silence of the System: How Frederick County Public Schools Failed Its Most Vulnerable Students

When a school built to protect its most vulnerable becomes the scene of their greatest betrayal, silence is no longer compassion—it’s complicity. The case of former Oakdale Middle School aide John McAleer exposes not just one man’s alleged crimes, but a system that ignored warning signs, failed to report, and left disabled children defenseless in plain sight.

The Silence of the System: How Frederick County Public Schools Failed Its Most Vulnerable Students Read More

The Hidden Market in Broken Homes: How Family Courts Became a Profit Center

The article by Michael Phillips argues that family courts and child welfare systems have evolved into profit-driven industries, prioritizing revenue over family stability. Federal laws like Title IV-D and Title IV-E incentivize conflict and child removal, creating a cycle of dependency and trauma for families. Reform is essential to shift these damaging incentives.

The Hidden Market in Broken Homes: How Family Courts Became a Profit Center Read More

The Records They Wouldn’t Release — and the Mother They Jailed

The case of Giselle Smiel highlights significant issues of transparency and jurisdictional failures in California’s justice system. After a May 2025 incident involving alleged child abduction, Smiel faced six felony charges despite having no criminal history. Denied access to public records and effective legal representation, she remains in jail, raising concerns over systemic accountability and due process.

The Records They Wouldn’t Release — and the Mother They Jailed Read More