Home » DHS

Dead Reckoning: The Post-9/11 Security State, Twenty-Five Years On

The article examines the lasting impact of post-9/11 security measures, particularly focusing on the Department of Homeland Security and its shift towards immigration enforcement. While some policies have been rolled back, such as bulk phone metadata collection, many core structures remain intact or have adapted to new purposes without proper reassessment by Congress, illustrating an enduring security state.

Dead Reckoning: The Post-9/11 Security State, Twenty-Five Years On Read More

What the Documents Actually Say — And Why Nobody Wanted to Hear It

Michael Phillips reviews the implications of declassified documents following President Trump’s speech on election security. While some claims in the speech are substantiated, others are exaggerated or misconstrued. The central argument—that China aimed to influence the 2020 election—contradicts intelligence assessments, highlighting discrepancies between presented narratives and actual judgments.

What the Documents Actually Say — And Why Nobody Wanted to Hear It Read More

Deadly Evasion: When Immigration Policy Meets Public Safety

An illegal immigrant fleeing ICE agents allegedly caused a fatal crash that killed an innocent American driver. The tragedy raises urgent questions about enforcement gaps, sanctuary policies, and public safety accountability.

Deadly Evasion: When Immigration Policy Meets Public Safety Read More

Is There a Real Problem at DHS, or Just Partisan Defiance?

Recent federal court rulings criticize the Department of Homeland Security and Immigration and Customs Enforcement for constitutional violations, notably obstructing detainees’ access to legal counsel. This governmental overreach raises concerns regarding accountability and legal compliance. Both sides of the political spectrum must address these institutional issues to uphold the rule of law effectively.

Is There a Real Problem at DHS, or Just Partisan Defiance? Read More

Enforcement, Not Excuses: Arizona Charges 150 in Immigration-Related Crimes in One Week

Federal prosecutors in Arizona charged more than 150 individuals in a single week for immigration-related crimes, underscoring what sustained enforcement looks like when the rule of law is treated as policy—not rhetoric.

Enforcement, Not Excuses: Arizona Charges 150 in Immigration-Related Crimes in One Week Read More

A Cybersecurity Crisis of Conservative Credibility: Why CISA’s Leadership Problems Matter

The incident involving CISA’s acting director, Madhu Gottumukkala, highlights significant lapses in cybersecurity protocol, as he uploaded sensitive documents to ChatGPT, prompting alarming security reviews. This failure emphasizes broader concerns about agency leadership, staffing reductions, and the importance of maintaining strong cybersecurity to deter adversaries and ensure national security integrity.

A Cybersecurity Crisis of Conservative Credibility: Why CISA’s Leadership Problems Matter Read More

Federal Judge Limits DHS After Minneapolis Shooting — A Necessary Check or Dangerous Overreach?

A federal judge has issued a restraining order against the Department of Homeland Security following a deadly shooting involving federal agents in Minneapolis, forcing the agency to preserve evidence and submit to judicial oversight. The move underscores a growing clash between federal enforcement power and constitutional accountability.

Federal Judge Limits DHS After Minneapolis Shooting — A Necessary Check or Dangerous Overreach? Read More

Georgia Election Software Debate Reignites After Raffensperger Testimony

A debate on election integrity in Georgia resurfaced as the Georgia Freedom Caucus accused Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger of using vulnerable voting software. Critics cite past reviews highlighting risks associated with Dominion Voting Systems, while Raffensperger maintains the system’s security. Discussions reveal a divide among Republicans regarding election technology’s complexity and trustworthiness.

Georgia Election Software Debate Reignites After Raffensperger Testimony Read More

Legal Risk Explainer: Federal Preemption and Funding Exposure in Local ICE Restrictions

Local governments, like Montgomery County, face legal risks when restricting cooperation with federal immigration enforcement, particularly regarding federal preemption and funding exposure. While they can non-cooperate, crossing into obstruction invites lawsuits and potential funding cuts. This situation underscores a national trend, affecting local jurisdictions’ autonomy and creating varied immigration enforcement across the country.

Legal Risk Explainer: Federal Preemption and Funding Exposure in Local ICE Restrictions Read More