Home » family court bias

The Standard Nobody Published: Maryland’s Amended Protective Order Law, Eight Years Without a Reported Case

A Maryland custody case once made law. Then, over six years and five more appeals, Reichert v. Hornbeck generated a body of unreported family-law rulings that resolved recurring questions but never entered the state’s published precedent. This article examines what that means for litigants, lawyers, and the public.
Grounded in the article’s opening and its explanation of the five unreported opinions and their impact.

The Standard Nobody Published: Maryland’s Amended Protective Order Law, Eight Years Without a Reported Case Read More

One Standard for Justice, Not Two: How Political Hypocrisy Mirrors Family Court Bias

Family courts, like our political system, suffer from a dangerous double standard. Fathers’ voices are too often dismissed, their evidence ignored, while mothers’ accusations are taken at face value. Just as the media excuses extremism from the left while condemning the right, family courts excuse obstruction by mothers while punishing fathers for even minor missteps. Until there is one consistent standard of justice, parents—and children—will continue to pay the price.

One Standard for Justice, Not Two: How Political Hypocrisy Mirrors Family Court Bias Read More

Two Years Without My Son: How Montgomery County Circuit Court Refuses to Enforce Custody Orders

The author laments nearly two years of estrangement from his son due to the Montgomery County Circuit Court’s failure to enforce custody orders. Despite providing evidence of parental interference, judges dismissed his pleas, resulting in instability for the child and alienation for the father. The author calls for systemic reform to ensure accountability.

Two Years Without My Son: How Montgomery County Circuit Court Refuses to Enforce Custody Orders Read More

Seven Ways Montgomery County Circuit Court Enables Custodial Interference

The author describes their experience with Montgomery County Circuit Court, highlighting systemic failures in enforcing custody orders. Key issues include treating violations as disputes, failing to enforce contempt, prioritizing mediation, and ignoring parental alienation. These practices harm both children and parents, necessitating accountability and transparency in family courts to protect children’s rights.

Seven Ways Montgomery County Circuit Court Enables Custodial Interference Read More

“Pay Up or Shut Up”: How South Carolina’s Legal-Political Machine Silences Parents Like William Sewell

William Sewell’s case in South Carolina highlights systemic failures in family court, revealing a punitive culture against parents exposing corruption. Legislator Gill Gatch’s remarks underscore a corrupt pay-to-play system, where speaking out leads to ostracization while silence necessitates financial submission, ultimately jeopardizing families and perpetuating injustices.

“Pay Up or Shut Up”: How South Carolina’s Legal-Political Machine Silences Parents Like William Sewell Read More

The Guardian Who Took Sides: Bias, Billing, and the Broken Role of a GAL in William Sewell’s Case

In William Sewell’s custody case, the Guardian ad Litem, Jason Wheeler, failed to maintain impartiality, favoring opposing legal counsel and neglecting serious allegations of neglect and substance abuse. His inadequate investigation and biased report raised questions about integrity in the court system, undermining trust and compromising the best interests of children.

The Guardian Who Took Sides: Bias, Billing, and the Broken Role of a GAL in William Sewell’s Case Read More

The ADA Black Hole: How Judges Pretend Disability Rights Don’t Exist in America’s Courtrooms

The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) is often disregarded in U.S. courts, resulting in severe consequences for disabled litigants like Marc Fishman and Taran Nolan. Courts frequently deny or ignore ADA accommodations, causing emotional and legal chaos. This systemic issue necessitates enforcement, training, and accountability for judges to ensure equal justice.

The ADA Black Hole: How Judges Pretend Disability Rights Don’t Exist in America’s Courtrooms Read More

“Even the Famous Aren’t Safe”: Oliver Anthony’s Divorce, Fame, and the Scornful Machinery of Family Court

Oliver Anthony’s rise to fame with “Rich Men North of Richmond” has not shielded him from the family court system, where he faces demands from his ex-wife for a portion of his future earnings. His song “Scornful Woman” reveals the emotional and financial toll of divorce, highlighting systemic issues affecting fathers, regardless of status.

“Even the Famous Aren’t Safe”: Oliver Anthony’s Divorce, Fame, and the Scornful Machinery of Family Court Read More

Maryland’s New Child Support Rules: A Fast-Track to Poverty and Prison?

Maryland’s recent procedural changes in child support cases facilitate electronic service, which the state claims will help low-income families. However, these changes create vulnerabilities for struggling parents, primarily fathers, allowing for easier enforcement actions without adequate due process. Critics argue this reform prioritizes revenue generation over genuine support and justice for families.

Maryland’s New Child Support Rules: A Fast-Track to Poverty and Prison? Read More

Biased from the Bench: How Judge Kimmons Shut Down a Father’s Fight for Fairness

William Sewell, a self-represented father in custody proceedings, faced systemic bias and judicial misconduct in Judge Mandy Kimmons’ courtroom. Despite filing a motion for fair treatment, Sewell was denied protections and held to unfair standards while opposing counsel manipulated evidence. This case highlights severe issues in the family court system regarding support for self-represented litigants.

Biased from the Bench: How Judge Kimmons Shut Down a Father’s Fight for Fairness Read More