Home » Topics » Family Court » Child Custody

Child Custody
3 - Investigations / 4 - Cases / Child Custody / Child Custody / Child Trafficking / Child Welfare / Court Corruption / Family Court / Family Court Reform / Government / Institutions / Legal Reform / Maryland / Maryland Watch / Series / The Reichert Files / The Shadow Docket of Reichert v. Hornbeck

The 90-Day Order: How an Unprecedented Custody Decision Became Invisible Law

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

In February 2022, Judge Alison L. Asti ordered Jeffrey Reichert to have no contact with his son, G.R., for ninety days, disrupting their long-established custody. The unreported appellate opinion overlooked crucial case history, raising concerns about judicial consistency and transparency in contested custody cases involving allegations of parental alienation.

The 90-Day Order: How an Unprecedented Custody Decision Became Invisible Law Read More
Child Custody / Child Custody / Child Trafficking / Civil Rights / Civil Rights / Domestic Violence / Family Court / Federal Court / Maryland / Maryland Watch / parental rights / Parental Rights / The Reichert Files

Hornbeck’s Panic Play: Motion to Dismiss Filed Days After Deposition Raised Questions About Basis for Criminal Charges

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Sarah Hornbeck has filed a Motion to Dismiss in the federal case Reichert v. Hornbeck after a deposition where she faltered under questioning regarding the evidence for her criminal charges against ex-husband Jeff Reichert. Critics claim her motion is a desperate attempt to avoid accountability in a long custody battle that alienated Reichert from their son.

Hornbeck’s Panic Play: Motion to Dismiss Filed Days After Deposition Raised Questions About Basis for Criminal Charges Read More
Child Custody / Child Custody / Child Trafficking / Child Welfare / Family Court / Family Court Reform / Federal Court / Maryland / Maryland Watch / The Reichert Files

“I Don’t Recall”: Inside the Deposition That Could Unravel a Maryland Attorney’s Protective-Order Case

- by Michael Phillips - 1 Comment

A recent deposition in the federal case Reichert v. Hornbeck is raising serious questions about the credibility of key accusations that once led to dozens of criminal charges against a father locked in a custody dispute.

During questioning, Sarah Hornbeck repeatedly stated she did not recall critical events surrounding those allegations—events that ultimately led to the plaintiff spending time in jail and facing years of litigation before the charges were dismissed.

Court filings indicate the accusations resulted in at least 26 criminal charges, all of which were later dropped or dismissed.

The pattern of memory gaps now sits at the center of a federal malicious prosecution lawsuit.

“I Don’t Recall”: Inside the Deposition That Could Unravel a Maryland Attorney’s Protective-Order Case Read More
Child Custody / Child Custody / Child Protective Services / Child Support / Child Welfare / Family Court / Foster Care

We Just Marked World Children’s Day — And Children’s Grief Awareness Day. America Failed Both.

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

World Children’s Day and Children’s Grief Awareness Day highlight the rights and emotional wounds of children. The 1959 Declaration underscores rights like family and protection, yet American systems often violate them, creating system-created grief. Children face trauma from separations and ineffective court processes. Urgent reforms are needed for healing and accountability.

We Just Marked World Children’s Day — And Children’s Grief Awareness Day. America Failed Both. Read More
Accountability / Child Custody / Child Protective Services / Child Welfare / Executive / Executive Order / Family Court / Foster Care / Government

Melania Trump’s “Fostering the Future” Executive Order Signals a New Federal Push for Family Preservation and Accountability

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Melania Trump’s Executive Order, “Fostering the Future,” marks a transformative shift in U.S. child welfare policy, prioritizing family preservation over removals. It mandates transparency, accountability, and support for aging-out youth, while reopening pathways for faith-based organizations. This initiative recognizes the failures of the system and emphasizes the need for a family-oriented approach.

Melania Trump’s “Fostering the Future” Executive Order Signals a New Federal Push for Family Preservation and Accountability Read More
3 - Investigations / 4 - Cases / Brenna Gano Case / Child Custody / Child Custody / Family Court / Mental Health

The Psychiatric Weapon: How Mental Health Was Turned into a Weapon of Control

- by Michael Phillips - 1 Comment

California’s family courts exploit psychological diagnoses to control parents, monetizing their trauma under the guise of therapy. The interconnected system—comprising judges, evaluators, and therapists—creates dependencies that perpetuate conflict and financial burdens on families. Brenna Gano’s case exemplifies this abuse, revealing systemic failures and calls for urgent reform to protect vulnerable individuals.

The Psychiatric Weapon: How Mental Health Was Turned into a Weapon of Control Read More
California / California Watch / Child Custody / Child Custody / Child Protective Services / Child Welfare / Domestic Violence / Family Court / Family Court Reform / San Marcos Abduction Attempt / The Smiel Series

From Safe Haven to Systemic Betrayal: How San Diego’s Polinsky Children’s Center Failed the Smiel Family

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Hundreds of lawsuits, state violations, and survivor accounts paint a devastating portrait of San Diego County’s flagship children’s shelter — the same facility where Giselle Smiel’s kids were taken before being handed to their abusive father.
Polinsky’s story reveals how California’s “child-protection” pipeline can deliver children straight back into danger.

From Safe Haven to Systemic Betrayal: How San Diego’s Polinsky Children’s Center Failed the Smiel Family Read More
Child Custody / Court Reform / Family Court / Family Court Reform / Government / Government Reform / Legal Reform / Mental Health / Military / Military & Defense / transparency / Veterans / Veterans

Broken Promises — After the Uniform, After the Family

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

By Michael Phillips | The Thunder Report x Fatherand.Co “They told me I’d never be alone.But when I left the service — and lost my family — no one called.Not …

Broken Promises — After the Uniform, After the Family Read More
Child Custody / Court Reform / Defense / Family Court / Family Court Reform / Government / Government Reform / Legal Reform / Mental Health / Military / Military & Defense / Veterans

Collateral Damage — Suicide, Stigma, and the Military Parent Crisis

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The Thunder Report highlights the alarming suicide rates among U.S. service members, linking prevalent family separation and administrative stress to mental health crises. Despite significant data showcasing these trends, the Pentagon fails to connect family advocacy outcomes to suicide prevention, resulting in institutional negligence that leads to tragic losses.

Collateral Damage — Suicide, Stigma, and the Military Parent Crisis Read More
Advocacy / Child Custody / Family Court / Family Court Reform / Government / Government Reform / Legal Reform / Mental Health / Military / Military & Defense / Parental Rights / Veterans / Veterans

Weaponized FAP: How DoD’s Family Court Ends Careers and Families — Without a Trial

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The Family Advocacy Program (FAP) within the military is critiqued for lacking due process, as it allows decisions on allegations to be made without the accused’s presence or counsel. This system, coupled with a high “met criteria” rate, has severe consequences on service members’ careers and well-being, often leading to irreversible harm.

Weaponized FAP: How DoD’s Family Court Ends Careers and Families — Without a Trial Read More