Home » Judicial Ethics

Tag: Judicial Ethics
2 - Analysis / 3 - Investigations / Circuit Court / Civil Court / Civil Rights / Civil Rights / Court Corruption / Court Reform / Domestic Policy / Family Court / Family Court Reform / Government / Institutions / Institutions & Accountability / Justice & Governance / Maryland / Maryland Watch

No One Is Watching: How Montgomery County’s Family Court Operates Without External Oversight, and What Happens to the People Who Notice

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

An investigation reveals a significant accountability gap in Maryland’s family court system, where civil rights complaints against judges lack external oversight and transparency. Complaints filed are often sealed and unreported, leading to systemic noncompliance without recourse for litigants. This raises critical issues about judicial accountability and the structures that enable potential misconduct.

No One Is Watching: How Montgomery County’s Family Court Operates Without External Oversight, and What Happens to the People Who Notice Read More
Judicial / Media / Media & Influence / News & Media / Opinion / Voice

When a Justice Joins the Applause: Why the Grammys Were the Wrong Place for Judicial Neutrality

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The controversy over Ketanji Brown Jackson’s attendance at the Grammys centers on her participation in an “ICE OUT” moment, raising concerns about judicial neutrality. Critics argue that her applause risks undermining public confidence in the Supreme Court’s impartiality, blurring lines between law and activism, and damaging the Court’s legitimacy in a polarized culture.

When a Justice Joins the Applause: Why the Grammys Were the Wrong Place for Judicial Neutrality Read More
Family Court / Government / Government / Justice Denied: The Impeachment Files / Locked Out of Justice / Politics / Supreme Court / Supreme Court / Whistleblower Reports

Justice Denied: The Impeachment Files

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Janice Wolk Grenadier is challenging Chief Justice John G. Roberts over the upcoming private gala at the Supreme Court, which she argues symbolizes elitism in the judiciary. She filed a Petition for Impeachment citing constitutional violations and calling for Congress to act against the growing disconnect between the legal elite and ordinary citizens.

Justice Denied: The Impeachment Files Read More
Adr / Constitutional Law / Court Reform / Family Court

Judges with a Financial Stake in Your Case? Why That’s a Constitutional Crisis

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The family court system faces significant issues regarding judicial impartiality, as many judges have financial ties that create conflicts of interest. Despite the Supreme Court’s ruling in Caperton v. A.T. Massey, recusal is rarely practiced, leading to a constitutional crisis where litigants, particularly vulnerable ones, are deprived of fair hearings.

Judges with a Financial Stake in Your Case? Why That’s a Constitutional Crisis Read More
Campaigns / Judicial / Legislation / Politics

Maryland and Virginia Need Their Own TRUST Act: It’s Time to Pull Back the Curtain on Judicial Bias

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Texas has introduced the TRUST Act to enhance judicial transparency by requiring judges to disclose financial contributions from parties appearing in their courts. This initiative addresses concerns over bias due to political contributions, aiming to restore public confidence in the legal system. Maryland and Virginia should adopt similar measures to ensure fairness and accountability in their judiciary.

Maryland and Virginia Need Their Own TRUST Act: It’s Time to Pull Back the Curtain on Judicial Bias Read More
Government / Judges / Judicial / Laws / Legislation / Money and Finance

Maryland and Virginia Need Their Own TRUST Act: It’s Time to Pull Back the Curtain on Judicial Bias

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Texas’ TRUST Act mandates judges disclose campaign contributions and financial support from parties appearing in court, enhancing transparency and restoring public faith in the judicial system. Maryland and Virginia lack similar transparency measures, raising concerns about bias and favoritism. Introducing a TRUST Act in these states would promote fairness and accountability.

Maryland and Virginia Need Their Own TRUST Act: It’s Time to Pull Back the Curtain on Judicial Bias Read More