Home » Pro Se Litigant

Tag: Pro Se Litigant
Accountability / bias / Child Custody / Child Custody / Child Support / Child Support / Civil Rights / Corruption / Court Corruption / Family Court / Family Court Reform / Misconduct / The Corruption Series

Fighting Back: How to Stand Up to Corrupt Attorneys and Judges in Family Court Without Losing Everything

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The American family court system often fails to protect children and instead punishes parents, particularly those who self-represent. To navigate this challenging landscape, parents should understand court procedures, document interactions, utilize public opinion, file persistent motions, and leverage civil rights laws. Building alliances strengthens their position, enabling them to challenge the system effectively.

Fighting Back: How to Stand Up to Corrupt Attorneys and Judges in Family Court Without Losing Everything Read More
Accountability / Child Custody / Child Custody / Child Protective Services / Child Support / Child Support / Civil Rights / Constitutional Rights / Corruption / Court Corruption / Court Of Ruin The William Sewell Files / Family Court / Family Court Reform / Father's Rights / parental rights / Rights and Freedoms / South Carolina / South Carolina Watch / The Corruption Series

Twelve Motions Denied: The Systematic Erosion of Rights in Sewell’s Case

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The Sewell v. Sewell case illustrates a troubling pattern within the South Carolina Family Court, where twelve motions filed by William Sewell seeking justice were uniformly denied without adequate explanation. This systemic denial of due process highlights a court environment prioritizing power over fairness, leaving vulnerable parties without legal recourse or representation.

Twelve Motions Denied: The Systematic Erosion of Rights in Sewell’s Case Read More
Child Custody / Child Custody / Child Support / Child Support / Corruption / Court Corruption / Court Of Ruin The William Sewell Files / Family Court / Family Court Reform / Judicial / South Carolina / South Carolina Watch / The Corruption Series

The Discovery Trap: How Legal Gamesmanship Bled a Father Dry in Family Court

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

William Sewell, representing himself in a South Carolina custody battle, encountered systemic deception and financial devastation in family court. Despite his compliance, he faced manipulation through a flawed discovery process, resulting in significant expenses and lack of proper documentation. His experience illustrates a larger issue where self-represented litigants are exploited within the legal system.

The Discovery Trap: How Legal Gamesmanship Bled a Father Dry in Family Court Read More
Accountability / Ada Accommodations / Alternative Dispute Resolution / Child Custody / Civil Rights / Clerks / Court Corruption / Court Reform / Disability Rights / Due Process Denied / Family Court / Family Court Reform / Father's Rights / Judges / Judicial / Judicial Disability / New York / New York Watch / The Corruption Series / The Fishman Files

No Order, No Appeal: The Quiet Corruption of Judge-Shopping in Westchester Family Court

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Marc Fishman, a disabled father, seeks a signed transfer order for his family court case after it was reassigned from Judge Burke to Judge Michelle Schauer without documentation. Despite multiple requests, the court has not provided clarity, raising concerns about judicial misconduct, ADA violations, and lack of due process for pro se litigants.

No Order, No Appeal: The Quiet Corruption of Judge-Shopping in Westchester Family Court Read More
Attorneys / Civil Rights / Corruption / Court Of Ruin The William Sewell Files / Family Court / South Carolina

The Last Minute Drop-Off: Sabotage, Silence, and a Father’s Restraint

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

William Sewell faces a tumultuous custody battle, with recent events compounding an ongoing struggle against obstruction from his ex-wife, Leslie. Despite being denied visitation and receiving a sudden handoff of his daughter Dema, William remains committed and documents everything while preparing for court. He plans to file a Motion for Contempt to address Leslie’s manipulative behavior and ensure a stable co-parenting arrangement.

The Last Minute Drop-Off: Sabotage, Silence, and a Father’s Restraint Read More
Advocacy / Child Custody / Corruption / Court Of Ruin The William Sewell Files / Court Reform / Family Court / Mental Health / South Carolina

No Counsel, No Time, No Chance — A Father’s Impossible Trial

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

William H. Sewell faces a family court trial alone, lacking legal representation, knowledge, and time to prepare for custody of his daughter. His previous attorney abandoned him, leaving him defenseless against serious accusations. The system seems rigged against him, highlighting systemic injustices that can devastate unprepared parents.

No Counsel, No Time, No Chance — A Father’s Impossible Trial Read More
Advocacy / Child Custody / Civil Rights / Corruption / Court Of Ruin The William Sewell Files / Court Reform / Family Court / Mental Health / South Carolina

Punished for Parenting: How the Family Court System Destroys the Very People It Claims to Protect

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

In Part 10 of “Court of Ruin: The William Sewell Files,” William Sewell’s pursuit of joint custody spirals into legal chaos, financial ruin, and threats of jail time. Despite his efforts to engage as a father, the family court system imposes devastating fees and dismisses his evidence, showcasing systemic injustices faced by many parents.

Punished for Parenting: How the Family Court System Destroys the Very People It Claims to Protect Read More
Constitutional Law / Corruption / Court Of Ruin The William Sewell Files / Family Court / South Carolina / Supreme Court

Judicial Notice and Due Process: Why South Carolina Must Apply Turner v. Rogers in the William Sewell Case

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

William Sewell, a South Carolina father, faces potential incarceration over unpaid child support and a hefty guardian ad litem fee. His case raises due process concerns, particularly regarding the right to legal counsel as outlined in Turner v. Rogers. This situation highlights systemic injustices towards indigent parents in family courts across the U.S.

Judicial Notice and Due Process: Why South Carolina Must Apply Turner v. Rogers in the William Sewell Case Read More