Home » family court injustice

How Do You Jail the Disabled Dad While the System Walks Free?

Marc Fishman, a Bronx disability rights advocate, faces a 45-day jail sentence tied to a convoluted legal battle with Westchester authorities, including wrongful arrest during supervised visitation with his son. His case raises concerns over due process, ADA violations, and judicial accountability, drawing national attention amid calls for emergency intervention before imprisonment.

How Do You Jail the Disabled Dad While the System Walks Free? Read More

Disability Discrimination and Cover-Ups: Westchester DA Joyce Miller’s Assault on Justice

In Westchester County, District Attorney Joyce Miller’s push for a five-year order of protection against Marc Fishman ignores exculpatory evidence and discriminates against disabled parents. Fishman claims this institutional abuse has caused unnecessary separation from his children, prompting a federal lawsuit to challenge the misconduct and advocate for accountability.

Disability Discrimination and Cover-Ups: Westchester DA Joyce Miller’s Assault on Justice Read More

Let the Child Be Heard: How Virginia’s New Law Empowers Truth and Justice in Family Court

Virginia’s new law, HB 2115, effective July 1, 2025, empowers judges to summon children in family court to address high-conflict custody disputes. This reform aims to ensure children’s voices are heard, countering parental manipulation and creating a more balanced legal process. Other states, like Maryland, should consider similar measures for accountability and transparency.

Let the Child Be Heard: How Virginia’s New Law Empowers Truth and Justice in Family Court Read More

When Custody Reform Threatens Profits, the Legal Industry Panics

New Jersey Senate Bill S-4510 aims to prioritize children’s preferences in custody disputes and require evidence for reunification therapy, facing opposition from matrimonial lawyers concerned about profit loss. Critics argue it challenges the current system’s control and accountability, emphasizing the need for children’s voices in family court decisions and reforming the legal framework.

When Custody Reform Threatens Profits, the Legal Industry Panics Read More

Judicial Injustice in Suburbia: How Judge Bibi Berry and Montgomery County Family Court Became Every Father’s Worst Nightmare

Montgomery County, Maryland faces allegations of bias and misconduct within its family court, primarily involving Judge Bibi Berry. Fathers describe a hostile environment where due process is lacking, and their voices are ignored. Calls for oversight and possible impeachment of Berry are increasing as the judicial culture is seen as damaging to families and children.

Judicial Injustice in Suburbia: How Judge Bibi Berry and Montgomery County Family Court Became Every Father’s Worst Nightmare Read More

You Have the Right to Remain Silent—Yes, Even in Family Court

Miranda Rights extend beyond criminal arrests to family court, which can threaten personal liberty and finances. Individuals facing inquiries about finances may invoke the Fifth Amendment to protect against self-incrimination. With no constitutional safeguards, understanding one’s rights in family court is essential, as the implications can be severe and life-altering.

You Have the Right to Remain Silent—Yes, Even in Family Court Read More

The Shadow Guardian: Who Is John Michel and Why Is He Central to the Reichert v. Hornbeck Custody Crisis?

John Michel, central to a contentious custody battle, is married to Sarah Hornbeck, mother of Grant Reichert. Allegations against him include coercion and manipulation, particularly following the suspicious death of his wife. Michel’s behavior raises concerns of emotional abuse toward Grant, sidelining his biological father, Jeff Reichert, in a troubling court saga.

The Shadow Guardian: Who Is John Michel and Why Is He Central to the Reichert v. Hornbeck Custody Crisis? Read More

Justice Under Siege – How the System Crushes Those Who Speak Out

Part 12 of “Court of Ruin” addresses systemic injustice in South Carolina’s family court, focusing on reform proposals to enhance oversight, transparency, and accountability. It emphasizes the necessity of independent reviews, fair legal representation, and protections for whistleblowers, culminating in a call to action for collective change in a broken system.

Justice Under Siege – How the System Crushes Those Who Speak Out Read More

When Four Seconds Define a Father: What the Family Court System Refuses to See

This article reveals the struggles of fathers navigating the family court system, highlighting their emotional trauma as they fight for their children amidst systemic bias. One father’s experience illustrates the psychological warfare they face, often being treated unfairly while their love and efforts are dismissed. The piece offers coping strategies and emphasizes the importance of resilience.

When Four Seconds Define a Father: What the Family Court System Refuses to See Read More

The Protected Predator: How Lane Schlesinger Evaded Accountability for 15 Years

In New Rochelle, former police officer Lane Schlesinger exemplifies systemic misconduct, ignoring regulations during a COVID-19 incident and facing no accountability for numerous violations. Instead of discipline, he retired with a generous pension while individuals like Marc Fishman endure unjust consequences. This case highlights a troubling culture within police departments favoring protection over integrity.

The Protected Predator: How Lane Schlesinger Evaded Accountability for 15 Years Read More