Home » Courtroom Bias

What Would It Have Taken to Get a Fair Trial?

The article critiques the unfair trial experienced by William Sewell in a South Carolina family court. It outlines the essential legal safeguards denied to him, such as a neutral judge, access to counsel, equitable discovery, and protection from retaliation. Without these safeguards, the article argues, due process is compromised for self-represented parents across America.

What Would It Have Taken to Get a Fair Trial? Read More

Innocent Until Family Court: How Due Process Dies Behind Closed Doors

Family court in the U.S. operates differently from criminal courts, lacking essential rights like the presumption of innocence and a jury. False allegations are common, leading to unjust outcomes. The burden of proof lies with the accused, and mental health issues are weaponized against parents. Reforms are urgently needed to ensure fairness and due process.

Innocent Until Family Court: How Due Process Dies Behind Closed Doors Read More

Disrespected and Denied: How the Legal System Treats Pro Se Litigants Like Second-Class Citizens—and Why We Must Speak Out

Pro se litigants face systemic bias and mistreatment in court, often disregarded by judges and attorneys. Despite constitutional rights, they are frequently denied due process and subjected to disrespect. The article emphasizes the need for accountability in the legal system, urging individuals to speak out against judicial misconduct to reclaim justice.

Disrespected and Denied: How the Legal System Treats Pro Se Litigants Like Second-Class Citizens—and Why We Must Speak Out Read More