Home » Separation Of Powers

Tag: Separation Of Powers
Congress / Congress / Government / Laws / Politics / Politics / Politics & Power / Supreme Court / Supreme Court

Can Congress Actually Pass a Tariff Bill in 2026?

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The Supreme Court’s ruling has returned tariff authority solely to Congress, raising questions about its ability to pass a tariff bill in 2026. Despite Republican control, narrow margins and internal party divisions complicate the process. Legislative efforts and public opinion further influence the feasibility of successful tariff legislation amid political challenges.

Can Congress Actually Pass a Tariff Bill in 2026? Read More
Government / Judicial / Laws / Politics / Politics / Politics & Power / Power

Supreme Court Slams the Brakes on Executive Tariffs — But the Left Won’t Like What Comes Next

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the Trump administration overstepped its authority by imposing broad tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. This decision does not eliminate tariffs or presidential trade powers but requires congressional approval for significant trade policies, refocusing the debate on legislative accountability and structural limits on executive power.

Supreme Court Slams the Brakes on Executive Tariffs — But the Left Won’t Like What Comes Next Read More
Opinion / Politics & Power / Power / Voice

Democrats Lost the Election — So Why Are They Governing Like They Won?

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The editorial questions why Democrats, despite losing the last election, are obstructing the agenda voters endorsed. It highlights a troubling trend of treating elections as optional, undermining constitutional principles, and eroding civic trust. The piece argues that this approach could disengage voters and harm democracy, emphasizing the need for persuasion instead of obstruction.

Democrats Lost the Election — So Why Are They Governing Like They Won? Read More
Judicial / Lawfare & Intelligence / Politics / Politics / Politics & Power / Power

Power, Prosecution, and the Politics of Retaliation

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Conservative activist Kenneth Rosa warns of a troubling trend in American politics where elections increasingly determine not just policy, but also legal consequences for political figures. The perception of partisan motivations in law enforcement undermines public trust. Rosa argues that a justice system must maintain impartiality to preserve democracy and prevent retaliatory politics.

Power, Prosecution, and the Politics of Retaliation Read More
Laws / Politics / Politics / Security

Tulsi Gabbard Pushes Back on Intelligence Smears, Defends Statutory Authority

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Tulsi Gabbard, the Director of National Intelligence, publicly denounced accusations regarding her conduct in election security operations, asserting her actions were lawful and observational. Her unclassified letter to Congress emphasized the legal foundation of her role, highlighted the importance of intelligence autonomy, and underscored that election security is essential to national security.

Tulsi Gabbard Pushes Back on Intelligence Smears, Defends Statutory Authority Read More
Government / Opinion / Politics / Politics & Power / Power / Voice

The Real Threat Isn’t Presidential Power—It’s an Unaccountable Bureaucracy

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The Washington Post’s opinion asserts that President Trump’s dismissal of officials threatens democracy, bolstered by a careless Supreme Court. However, the argument is flawed, as Article II clearly grants executive power to the president. True democracy demands accountability, not bureaucratic permanence, with elections ensuring responsible governance.

The Real Threat Isn’t Presidential Power—It’s an Unaccountable Bureaucracy Read More
Government / Judicial / Law and Order / Lawfare & Intelligence / Laws

Eighth Circuit Halts Minnesota Order Targeting ICE, Rebukes Judicial Overreach

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

A federal appeals court has intervened to block a Minnesota judge’s restrictions on immigration enforcement by ICE, upholding federal authority. The stay emphasizes the constitutional principle that a state cannot impose operational limits on federal law enforcement. The case highlights concerns regarding judicial overreach and its impact on consistent law application.

Eighth Circuit Halts Minnesota Order Targeting ICE, Rebukes Judicial Overreach Read More
Government / Judicial / Laws / Politics / Politics & Power / Power

The 25th Amendment Is Not a Political Weapon

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The surge in calls for President Trump’s impeachment or the use of the 25th Amendment highlights the misuse of constitutional mechanisms intended for incapacity. Critics argue that these tools are being politicized, threatening the seriousness of constitutional safeguards and risking democratic stability. Proper discourse should occur through established legislative processes, not panic-driven measures.

The 25th Amendment Is Not a Political Weapon Read More
Congress / Congress / democrats / Democrats / Domestic Policy / Donald Trump / Executive / Executive Order / Executive Power & Civil Liberties / Government / Government / Government Waste / Government Watch / Legislation / National Affairs / Politics / President

Democrats Push “Vanity Ban” Bill While Ignoring Real Limits on Executive Power

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Democrats are pushing a so-called “vanity ban” on naming federal buildings, framing it as a stand against authoritarianism. Critics on the center right argue the bill is symbolic overreach—more political theater than a serious effort to enforce existing limits on executive power.

Democrats Push “Vanity Ban” Bill While Ignoring Real Limits on Executive Power Read More
Constitutional Law / Constitutional Rights / Federal Court / Government / Government Watch / Judges / Judicial / Politics

Roberts’ Year-End Report: A Quiet Defense of Judicial Independence Ahead of America’s 250th Anniversary

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

In his 2025 Year-End Report, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. emphasizes judicial independence as essential to the Constitution, framing the judiciary as a counter-majoritarian check rooted in American history. He reflects on past principles rather than current controversies, reinforcing the judiciary’s role in upholding the rule of law amidst political strife.

Roberts’ Year-End Report: A Quiet Defense of Judicial Independence Ahead of America’s 250th Anniversary Read More