Investigative Journalism | Exposing What Lies Beneath
The editorial questions why Democrats, despite losing the last election, are obstructing the agenda voters endorsed. It highlights a troubling trend of treating elections as optional, undermining constitutional principles, and eroding civic trust. The piece argues that this approach could disengage voters and harm democracy, emphasizing the need for persuasion instead of obstruction.
Michael Phillips argues that the focus on high-profile cases like Epstein distracts from the serious issues within the family court system affecting middle-class families. He condemns the profit-driven practices in family courts, calling for reforms such as abolishing Title IV-D incentives and ensuring due process. He urges Trump to prioritize these reforms to restore family integrity.
Forget Epstein’s Ghost—It’s Time Trump Took Aim at the Real Threat: America’s Corrupt Family Courts Read More
On July 14, 2025, the Supreme Court rulings in Trump v. J.G.G. and Kennedy v. Braidwood dismantled the legal framework of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), declaring only Article III courts can issue binding decisions. This has led to a crisis in state courts, exposing potentially void past rulings and requiring significant judicial reform.
The Fall of ADR: How the Supreme Court’s 2025 Rulings Exposed the Unconstitutional Rise of Shadow Justice Read More
On June 24, 2025, Neera Tanden revealed to Congress that she directed the use of an autopen to sign presidential documents without clear authorization, raising concerns about governance legitimacy and President Biden’s mental fitness. The situation highlights potential constitutional issues regarding executive power and the significant influence of unelected officials.
The Unelected President: Neera Tanden, the NGO Cartel, and the Greatest Conflict of Interest in Modern American Politics Read More