Home » Due Process » Page 3

“We Aren’t Having One of Those Today”

During a federal shutdown, a Los Angeles courtroom silenced advocates and observers during a hearing for domestic violence survivor Giselle Smiel, violating her ADA rights. Despite a provided Teams link for remote access, court staff denied participation, raising concerns over public oversight and institutional failure in providing justice and transparency for vulnerable individuals.

“We Aren’t Having One of Those Today” Read More

The Records They Wouldn’t Release — and the Mother They Jailed

The case of Giselle Smiel highlights significant issues of transparency and jurisdictional failures in California’s justice system. After a May 2025 incident involving alleged child abduction, Smiel faced six felony charges despite having no criminal history. Denied access to public records and effective legal representation, she remains in jail, raising concerns over systemic accountability and due process.

The Records They Wouldn’t Release — and the Mother They Jailed Read More

The Missing Eyes in Family Court: How Lack of Transparency Jailed a Survivor

Family courts claim to protect children, but secrecy has turned them into weapons against the very parents who seek safety. In California, survivor Giselle Smiel cared for her children alone for five years—only to lose them to an abusive ex after missing one hearing during her son’s medical emergency. Now she sits in jail on six felony charges, without transcripts, without ADA accommodations, and without transparency. Her case proves what advocates like Renata DeMello have long warned: until the public can see inside family court, justice will remain out of reach.

The Missing Eyes in Family Court: How Lack of Transparency Jailed a Survivor Read More

“Evidence, Not Ideology” — If Only the ABA Lived By Its Own Words

The American Bar Association (ABA) recently advocated for evidence-based justice while criticizing political influences. However, it faces accusations of selective outrage and inconsistency regarding its principles. The ABA’s historical silence on systemic injustices raises doubts about its commitment to neutrality. True reform requires the ABA to uphold its stated values across all cases.

“Evidence, Not Ideology” — If Only the ABA Lived By Its Own Words Read More

Justice Denied: Why New York Must Answer for Marc Fishman

A disabled father, Marc Fishman, faces wrongful imprisonment in New York despite clear evidence of his innocence, including admission from the arresting officer, Officer Schlesinger, later identified as corrupt. The prosecution disregards ethical obligations and fails to provide necessary accommodations. Marc’s story underscores systemic injustices threatening all citizens’ rights.

Justice Denied: Why New York Must Answer for Marc Fishman Read More

New York’s Shame: The State Hunts Marc Fishman While Ignoring Real Justice

In New York, Marc Fishman, a disabled father, endures a legal nightmare due to false accusations and judicial misconduct, facing a 45-day jail sentence despite exculpatory evidence. His appeals are delayed amid a lack of gubernatorial intervention, highlighting systemic failures and the abuse of power within the judicial system. Fishman’s plight reflects broader issues of injustice affecting vulnerable citizens.

New York’s Shame: The State Hunts Marc Fishman While Ignoring Real Justice Read More

How Do You Jail the Disabled Dad While the System Walks Free?

Marc Fishman, a Bronx disability rights advocate, faces a 45-day jail sentence tied to a convoluted legal battle with Westchester authorities, including wrongful arrest during supervised visitation with his son. His case raises concerns over due process, ADA violations, and judicial accountability, drawing national attention amid calls for emergency intervention before imprisonment.

How Do You Jail the Disabled Dad While the System Walks Free? Read More

The Gatekeepers No One Elected: How Maryland’s District Court Commissioners Shape Justice Before a Judge Ever Looks

Maryland’s justice system relies on District Court commissioners who operate 24/7 to manage warrantless arrests and set bail without needing legal training. This rapid process, favoring efficiency, risks false allegations affecting family law cases, with racial disparities in bail persisting. Reform is necessary to ensure due process and protect parental rights.

The Gatekeepers No One Elected: How Maryland’s District Court Commissioners Shape Justice Before a Judge Ever Looks Read More

Maryland Punishes Parents Harder Than Criminals — And It’s a National Shame

In Maryland, a father can be jailed for fighting false accusations in family court while a teenager who commits an armed carjacking is released the same night. Parents like Jeff Reichert have been punished more severely for wanting to see their children than violent offenders face for terrorizing communities. At times, it seems easier to access your child through prison visitation than through family court. That is not justice—it’s systemic failure, and it demands reform.

Maryland Punishes Parents Harder Than Criminals — And It’s a National Shame Read More

The Transcript Trap: How South Carolina Appeals Shut Parents Out of Justice

William Sewell’s appeal following Judge Mandy Kimmons’ ruling confronts a major obstacle: the trial transcript. Sewell argues that opposing counsel Donald Gamache must share the transcript based on legal precedent, while Gamache insists Sewell must pay for it. This financial barrier effectively obstructs due process and limits parents’ ability to contest unjust rulings.

The Transcript Trap: How South Carolina Appeals Shut Parents Out of Justice Read More