Home » Topics » Family Court » Child Support

Paper Crime Scene: How a County Line Turned a Custody Dispute Into a Felony Case

Giselle Farias Smiel faces felony charges for allegedly kidnapping her children, stemming from bureaucratic mistakes and insufficient evidence. The case highlights systemic failures, including secrecy and lack of inter-agency communication, which overshadow due process and create a troubling precedent for parental rights and disability protections within the legal system.

Paper Crime Scene: How a County Line Turned a Custody Dispute Into a Felony Case Read More

The Hidden Market in Broken Homes: How Family Courts Became a Profit Center

The article by Michael Phillips argues that family courts and child welfare systems have evolved into profit-driven industries, prioritizing revenue over family stability. Federal laws like Title IV-D and Title IV-E incentivize conflict and child removal, creating a cycle of dependency and trauma for families. Reform is essential to shift these damaging incentives.

The Hidden Market in Broken Homes: How Family Courts Became a Profit Center Read More

The Missing Eyes in Family Court: How Lack of Transparency Jailed a Survivor

Family courts claim to protect children, but secrecy has turned them into weapons against the very parents who seek safety. In California, survivor Giselle Smiel cared for her children alone for five years—only to lose them to an abusive ex after missing one hearing during her son’s medical emergency. Now she sits in jail on six felony charges, without transcripts, without ADA accommodations, and without transparency. Her case proves what advocates like Renata DeMello have long warned: until the public can see inside family court, justice will remain out of reach.

The Missing Eyes in Family Court: How Lack of Transparency Jailed a Survivor Read More

How Do You Jail the Disabled Dad While the System Walks Free?

Marc Fishman, a Bronx disability rights advocate, faces a 45-day jail sentence tied to a convoluted legal battle with Westchester authorities, including wrongful arrest during supervised visitation with his son. His case raises concerns over due process, ADA violations, and judicial accountability, drawing national attention amid calls for emergency intervention before imprisonment.

How Do You Jail the Disabled Dad While the System Walks Free? Read More

Judge Mandy Kimmons: Scribbled Orders, Broken Lives, and a Conveyor Belt to Jail

South Carolina family court Judge Mandy Kimmons is accused of misconduct, weaponizing her authority to impose contradictory orders that lead to unjust jail sentences for veterans and struggling parents. The complaints outline a pattern of negligence, abuse, and financial exploitation, revealing systemic failures that harm families and undermine justice.

Judge Mandy Kimmons: Scribbled Orders, Broken Lives, and a Conveyor Belt to Jail Read More

You Can’t Save Marriage Until You Change the Laws That Incentivize Divorce

The decline of marriage and the American family stems from laws that favor mothers in divorce, creating an unequal legal landscape for fathers. With no-fault divorce and financial incentives for custody battles, marriage becomes a risky venture for men, dissuading them from committing. Real reform is essential to restore fairness and encourage equal parenting.

You Can’t Save Marriage Until You Change the Laws That Incentivize Divorce Read More

The Opportunist: From Gun Board Failure to Family Court Predator

John H. Michel, a Maryland attorney with a problematic history, transitioned from a disgraced gun board member to a controversial figure in family court following his wife’s death. Exploiting vulnerabilities, he gained control over a child’s custody, raising serious concerns about his motives and actions, characterized as reckless opportunism. The consequences impact both public safety and family dynamics.

The Opportunist: From Gun Board Failure to Family Court Predator Read More

The South Carolina Family Court Trap: How Judges Use Rule Games to Dodge Accountability

On September 3, 2025, Judge Mandy Kimmons denied crucial motions filed by William Sewell in his divorce case, effectively stripping him of due process rights. This case exemplifies how South Carolina family courts manipulate procedures to protect judges at the expense of litigants, highlighting the urgent need for reform to ensure accountability and justice.

The South Carolina Family Court Trap: How Judges Use Rule Games to Dodge Accountability Read More

The Transcript Trap: How South Carolina Appeals Shut Parents Out of Justice

William Sewell’s appeal following Judge Mandy Kimmons’ ruling confronts a major obstacle: the trial transcript. Sewell argues that opposing counsel Donald Gamache must share the transcript based on legal precedent, while Gamache insists Sewell must pay for it. This financial barrier effectively obstructs due process and limits parents’ ability to contest unjust rulings.

The Transcript Trap: How South Carolina Appeals Shut Parents Out of Justice Read More

The South Carolina Family Court Trap: How Rule Games Deny Due Process and Protect Judges Like Mandy Kimmons

South Carolina’s family courts present parents with a legal dilemma where appealing flawed judgments risks missing deadlines, while filing motions leads to judges evading accountability. This contradictory system, exemplified by Judge Mandy Kimmons, denies due process and undermines family stability. Reform is crucial to protect parental rights and ensure judicial responsibility.

The South Carolina Family Court Trap: How Rule Games Deny Due Process and Protect Judges Like Mandy Kimmons Read More