Home » Ketanji Brown Jackson

Tag: Ketanji Brown Jackson
2 - Analysis / Constitutional Law / Constitutional Rights / Dead Reckoning / Government / Immigration / National Affairs / Politics / Supreme Court / Supreme Court

Dead Reckoning: After Barbara, Trump Charts a Narrower Course on Citizenship

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

President Trump signed two executive orders targeting commercial birth tourism and tightening citizenship eligibility for children of foreign enemies. This move follows a recent Supreme Court ruling asserting that children born in the U.S. are automatically citizens, despite their parents’ immigration status. The orders aim to enforce existing regulations with more rigor.

Dead Reckoning: After Barbara, Trump Charts a Narrower Course on Citizenship Read More
2 - Analysis / Campaigns / Constitutional Law / Constitutional Rights / Dead Reckoning / elections / Elections / Elections & Democracy / Money and Finance / Politics / Politics / Supreme Court / Supreme Court

The Stool With Three Broken Legs

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The Supreme Court recently ruled that political parties can spend unlimited amounts on campaign activities in coordination with candidates, overruling a 25-year precedent. This decision, driven by a majority opinion from Justice Kavanaugh, emphasized that existing regulations already mitigate corruption risks, effectively altering the electoral landscape just months before midterm elections.

The Stool With Three Broken Legs Read More
2 - Analysis / Constitutional Law / Constitutional Rights / Dead Reckoning / Government / Immigration / Politics / Politics / Supreme Court / Supreme Court

The Losing Side Won the Afternoon

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Following the Supreme Court’s ruling against Trump’s birthright citizenship executive order, the Republican response was swift and multifaceted. Within hours, actions included a DOJ memo prioritizing prosecutions and multiple proposed bills targeting birth tourism. This rapid shift indicates a strong institutional stance among Republicans, even as public support for birthright citizenship remains high.

The Losing Side Won the Afternoon Read More
2 - Analysis / Constitutional Law / Constitutional Rights / Dead Reckoning / Government / Immigration / Politics / Politics / Supreme Court / Supreme Court

Five Theories, One Bench: What the Birthright Citizenship Fracture Actually Tells Us

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The Supreme Court’s decision in Trump v. Barbara highlights divisions within the conservative justices, as they present differing theories on citizenship under the Fourteenth Amendment. The case reveals that originalism, intended to limit judicial interpretation, instead generated multiple conflicting views, indicating a fundamental disagreement on constitutional meaning among the dissenters.

Five Theories, One Bench: What the Birthright Citizenship Fracture Actually Tells Us Read More
Judicial / Media / Media & Influence / News & Media / Opinion / Voice

When a Justice Joins the Applause: Why the Grammys Were the Wrong Place for Judicial Neutrality

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The controversy over Ketanji Brown Jackson’s attendance at the Grammys centers on her participation in an “ICE OUT” moment, raising concerns about judicial neutrality. Critics argue that her applause risks undermining public confidence in the Supreme Court’s impartiality, blurring lines between law and activism, and damaging the Court’s legitimacy in a polarized culture.

When a Justice Joins the Applause: Why the Grammys Were the Wrong Place for Judicial Neutrality Read More
Constitutional Law / Judges / Judicial / Judicial Disability / Laws / Opinion / Supreme Court / Supreme Court

Opinion: Barrett Draws the Line—And Raises Questions About Jackson’s Role on the Supreme Court

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

In a significant opinion, Justice Amy Coney Barrett criticized Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s dissent in Trump v. CASA, Inc., highlighting the dangers of judicial overreach and the role of courts. She emphasized that judges must interpret the law, not legislate, marking a crucial boundary for future judicial conduct.

Opinion: Barrett Draws the Line—And Raises Questions About Jackson’s Role on the Supreme Court Read More