Home » Constitutional Rights

Was the Arrest of Don Lemon an Attack on the Constitution?

The arrest of journalist Don Lemon has sparked claims of First Amendment violations from Democratic officials. However, federal authorities clarified that the arrests were tied to alleged criminal conduct related to the targeting of a church, not journalism. The First Amendment protects speech but does not exempt individuals from investigation for non-speech conduct.

Was the Arrest of Don Lemon an Attack on the Constitution? Read More

Tuberville Draws Line Ahead of Supreme Court Showdown on Women’s Sports

As the Supreme Court weighs challenges to state laws protecting women’s sports, Senator Tommy Tuberville frames the debate as one of fairness and common sense—not partisan politics. The ruling could reshape Title IX and athletic policy nationwide.

Tuberville Draws Line Ahead of Supreme Court Showdown on Women’s Sports Read More

Roberts’ Year-End Report: A Quiet Defense of Judicial Independence Ahead of America’s 250th Anniversary

In his 2025 Year-End Report, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. emphasizes judicial independence as essential to the Constitution, framing the judiciary as a counter-majoritarian check rooted in American history. He reflects on past principles rather than current controversies, reinforcing the judiciary’s role in upholding the rule of law amidst political strife.

Roberts’ Year-End Report: A Quiet Defense of Judicial Independence Ahead of America’s 250th Anniversary Read More

Supreme Court Declines to Hear Challenge to Federal Marijuana Ban, Leaving Policy Fight to the Executive Branch

The U.S. Supreme Court’s refusal to hear Canna Provisions v. Bondi leaves marijuana illegal federally, despite state legalization. The case challenged the Controlled Substances Act as unconstitutional, but the Court’s silence maintains federal authority over states. With legal avenues closed, attention shifts to potential executive action for marijuana rescheduling.

Supreme Court Declines to Hear Challenge to Federal Marijuana Ban, Leaving Policy Fight to the Executive Branch Read More

Inside People v. Smiel: When Process Becomes the Story

Giselle Smiel faces five felonies, including kidnapping, for picking up her crying child at a San Diego school. Her defense argues there was no force or substantial movement, pointing to lack of evidence and jurisdictional issues. Advocates highlight constitutional violations and ADA neglect in her arrest, seeking dismissal of charges and oversight on family-court mechanisms in criminal cases.

Inside People v. Smiel: When Process Becomes the Story Read More

The Hidden Market in Broken Homes: How Family Courts Became a Profit Center

The article by Michael Phillips argues that family courts and child welfare systems have evolved into profit-driven industries, prioritizing revenue over family stability. Federal laws like Title IV-D and Title IV-E incentivize conflict and child removal, creating a cycle of dependency and trauma for families. Reform is essential to shift these damaging incentives.

The Hidden Market in Broken Homes: How Family Courts Became a Profit Center Read More

“Evidence, Not Ideology” — If Only the ABA Lived By Its Own Words

The American Bar Association (ABA) recently advocated for evidence-based justice while criticizing political influences. However, it faces accusations of selective outrage and inconsistency regarding its principles. The ABA’s historical silence on systemic injustices raises doubts about its commitment to neutrality. True reform requires the ABA to uphold its stated values across all cases.

“Evidence, Not Ideology” — If Only the ABA Lived By Its Own Words Read More

Democratic Violence and the Silencing of Voices: The Assassination of Charlie Kirk on the Eve of 9/11

The assassination of Charlie Kirk on the eve of 9/11 is more than a personal tragedy — it’s an act of democratic violence. A conservative voice was silenced with bullets, not debate, sending a chilling message to anyone who dares to speak freely. If free speech in America now requires a security detail, then our republic is already in crisis.

Democratic Violence and the Silencing of Voices: The Assassination of Charlie Kirk on the Eve of 9/11 Read More

Trump Was Right to Step In on D.C. Crime — But Federal Agents Don’t Get a Free Pass to Trample Rights

Washington, D.C. is suffering from rising crime and lawlessness, prompting President Trump to intervene for restoration of order. However, federal actions must not violate the Fourth Amendment or intimidate citizens. True leadership targets criminals while ensuring accountability and upholding liberties. Safety should not come at the expense of individual freedoms.

Trump Was Right to Step In on D.C. Crime — But Federal Agents Don’t Get a Free Pass to Trample Rights Read More

Maryland Liberals on Nextdoor Discover Federalism and Firearms—Too Late

Screenshots from Nextdoor reveal a shift among Montgomery County liberals discussing “soft secession” and advocating for firearm ownership against perceived federal overreach. This unexpected stance contradicts their history of supporting gun control. As political anxiety rises, Maryland residents grapple with irony, rediscovering principles they previously dismissed amidst fears of tyranny.

Maryland Liberals on Nextdoor Discover Federalism and Firearms—Too Late Read More