Home » Legal Injustice

The Evidence They Ignored: How Judge Maurice Williams Buried the Truth in Marc Fishman’s Case

Marc Fishman, exonerated by New York officials for child abuse allegations, faces potential jail time from Judge Maurice Williams despite exculpatory evidence being withheld. A supervised visit confirmed by a court-appointed supervisor supports Fishman’s innocence, highlighting issues in the judicial system that seem to silence evidence conflicting with prior rulings.

The Evidence They Ignored: How Judge Maurice Williams Buried the Truth in Marc Fishman’s Case Read More

Maryland’s Family Courts Are Failing Families: Here’s Why Reform Can’t Wait

Maryland’s family courts, intended to support families in crisis, have become burdensome and inefficient, often harming those they aim to protect. Overwhelmed by caseloads, biased practices, and financial barriers, these courts fail to prioritize children’s needs. Systemic reforms are necessary for accountability and transparency, urging public advocacy for meaningful change.

Maryland’s Family Courts Are Failing Families: Here’s Why Reform Can’t Wait Read More

What Would It Have Taken to Get a Fair Trial?

The article critiques the unfair trial experienced by William Sewell in a South Carolina family court. It outlines the essential legal safeguards denied to him, such as a neutral judge, access to counsel, equitable discovery, and protection from retaliation. Without these safeguards, the article argues, due process is compromised for self-represented parents across America.

What Would It Have Taken to Get a Fair Trial? Read More

When Justice Betrays Survivors: The Incarceration of Julie Valadez and the Family Court Crisis

In Walworth County, Wisconsin, Julie Valadez, a mother and domestic violence survivor, faces severe legal repercussions after her son sought safety with her, fleeing an abusive situation. Charged with felony counts and high bail, her case highlights systemic failures in family courts that often penalize protective parents instead of abusers.

When Justice Betrays Survivors: The Incarceration of Julie Valadez and the Family Court Crisis Read More

Justice for Sale in the Palmetto State: The ‘Baby Veronica’ Case and South Carolina’s Broken Custody System

The Baby Veronica case exemplifies the flaws in South Carolina’s family court system, prioritizing profit over justice. Dusten Brown’s fight for his daughter was undermined by legal technicalities and systemic bias against Native fathers. The ruling eroded parental rights, highlighting the need for reforms to uphold fatherly rights and enforce fair adoption practices.

Justice for Sale in the Palmetto State: The ‘Baby Veronica’ Case and South Carolina’s Broken Custody System Read More

The Guardian Who Took Sides: Bias, Billing, and the Broken Role of a GAL in William Sewell’s Case

In William Sewell’s custody case, the Guardian ad Litem, Jason Wheeler, failed to maintain impartiality, favoring opposing legal counsel and neglecting serious allegations of neglect and substance abuse. His inadequate investigation and biased report raised questions about integrity in the court system, undermining trust and compromising the best interests of children.

The Guardian Who Took Sides: Bias, Billing, and the Broken Role of a GAL in William Sewell’s Case Read More

A Second Declaration: How the Family Court Crisis Mirrors the Reasons We Fought for Independence

The article by Michael Phillips argues that modern family courts in the U.S. mirror the injustices of colonial rule, stripping parents of rights and imposing financial burdens without representation. It highlights issues of autonomy, accountability, and exploitation, urging a movement for reform to restore parental rights and challenge the corrupt judicial system.

A Second Declaration: How the Family Court Crisis Mirrors the Reasons We Fought for Independence Read More

Op-Ed: The Hypocrisy of Family Law — Why Family Court Should Be Abolished

They call it family law, but the only thing it truly governs is separation, silence, and suffering. This is not justice — it’s bureaucracy weaponized against love. In a system where judges hide behind opinion and immunity, where money decides custody, and where the Constitution is conveniently ignored, we must ask: who benefits from this chaos? Certainly not the children. Not the parents. Only the lawyers, the evaluators, the GALs, and the judges padding their pensions. The time has come to stop reforming family court — and start abolishing it.

Op-Ed: The Hypocrisy of Family Law — Why Family Court Should Be Abolished Read More

Biased from the Bench: How Judge Kimmons Shut Down a Father’s Fight for Fairness

William Sewell, a self-represented father in custody proceedings, faced systemic bias and judicial misconduct in Judge Mandy Kimmons’ courtroom. Despite filing a motion for fair treatment, Sewell was denied protections and held to unfair standards while opposing counsel manipulated evidence. This case highlights severe issues in the family court system regarding support for self-represented litigants.

Biased from the Bench: How Judge Kimmons Shut Down a Father’s Fight for Fairness Read More

Where Is Grant Reichert? A Father’s Plea, A System’s Silence

Jeff Reichert is desperately seeking his son, Grant, who has been missing for years amid a broken legal system that obstructs communication and denies wellness checks. Despite evidence of emotional distress and potential abuse, the court remains unresponsive, leaving Jeff fighting alone for accountability and reform. Where is Grant?

Where Is Grant Reichert? A Father’s Plea, A System’s Silence Read More