Home » Pro Se Litigants

When Family Court Leaves the Courtroom

The article highlights the risks parents face in private judging during family court proceedings, often unaware of its binding nature. Many experience significant pressure and confusion, leading to irreversible agreements without fully understanding the consequences. It emphasizes the need for clarity and proper legal guidance before consenting to such processes.

When Family Court Leaves the Courtroom Read More

The South Carolina Family Court Trap: How Judges Use Rule Games to Dodge Accountability

On September 3, 2025, Judge Mandy Kimmons denied crucial motions filed by William Sewell in his divorce case, effectively stripping him of due process rights. This case exemplifies how South Carolina family courts manipulate procedures to protect judges at the expense of litigants, highlighting the urgent need for reform to ensure accountability and justice.

The South Carolina Family Court Trap: How Judges Use Rule Games to Dodge Accountability Read More

The Transcript Trap: How South Carolina Appeals Shut Parents Out of Justice

William Sewell’s appeal following Judge Mandy Kimmons’ ruling confronts a major obstacle: the trial transcript. Sewell argues that opposing counsel Donald Gamache must share the transcript based on legal precedent, while Gamache insists Sewell must pay for it. This financial barrier effectively obstructs due process and limits parents’ ability to contest unjust rulings.

The Transcript Trap: How South Carolina Appeals Shut Parents Out of Justice Read More

Why Do Courts Hate Due Process? And Why It’s So Hard for Family Court Litigants to Obtain

Family courts often disregard constitutional due process, prioritizing expediency over fairness. This environment fosters misconduct due to secrecy and lack of oversight. Litigants, usually self-represented, may struggle to assert their rights. To combat this, parents must document objections, use specific legal terminology, file motions, and consider appeals to ensure accountability.

Why Do Courts Hate Due Process? And Why It’s So Hard for Family Court Litigants to Obtain Read More

Bleeding a Father Dry: The Orchestrated Financial Assault on William Sewell in South Carolina Family Court

William Sewell’s harrowing experience in South Carolina’s family court reveals a corrupt system exploiting vulnerable litigants for profit. Attorneys failed him, costs spiraled, and the Guardian ad Litem neglected his parental rights. Judge Mandy Kimmons enabled the exploitation, leading to financial ruin. The system, characterized as a racket, demands accountability and reform.

Bleeding a Father Dry: The Orchestrated Financial Assault on William Sewell in South Carolina Family Court Read More

When Justice Sleeps: What Happens When the Judge Doesn’t Read Your File

The article by Michael Phillips critiques the family court system, highlighting judges’ negligence in reviewing cases, leading to rubber-stamp rulings and biased decisions. It emphasizes the emotional toll on parents who feel unheard, calling for reforms like mandatory confirmation of document review and enhanced accountability to ensure fair hearings and justice in family courts.

When Justice Sleeps: What Happens When the Judge Doesn’t Read Your File Read More

The Fight After the Final Order: How South Carolina Courts Leave Pro Se Parents With No Way Out

William Sewell faces dire consequences following the Family Court of Dorchester County’s ruling granting custody of his daughter to his ex-wife, imposing significant financial burdens, and denying him legal representation. Despite these challenges, he pursues two post-judgment motions, arguing judicial bias and constitutional violations, determined to fight for his rights and child.

The Fight After the Final Order: How South Carolina Courts Leave Pro Se Parents With No Way Out Read More

“William Sewell vs. The System”: South Carolina’s Family Court Corruption Isn’t Just Alleged — It’s Alive and Well

The article discusses systemic corruption in South Carolina’s family courts, evidenced by William Sewell’s case, where he faces exorbitant legal fees and judicial favoritism. The judicial system protects entrenched attorneys and GALs who neglect children’s interests, silencing parents challenging unfair practices. The need for urgent judicial reform and oversight is emphasized.

“William Sewell vs. The System”: South Carolina’s Family Court Corruption Isn’t Just Alleged — It’s Alive and Well Read More

The ADA Black Hole: How Judges Pretend Disability Rights Don’t Exist in America’s Courtrooms

The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) is often disregarded in U.S. courts, resulting in severe consequences for disabled litigants like Marc Fishman and Taran Nolan. Courts frequently deny or ignore ADA accommodations, causing emotional and legal chaos. This systemic issue necessitates enforcement, training, and accountability for judges to ensure equal justice.

The ADA Black Hole: How Judges Pretend Disability Rights Don’t Exist in America’s Courtrooms Read More

You Have the Right to Remain Silent—Yes, Even in Family Court

Miranda Rights extend beyond criminal arrests to family court, which can threaten personal liberty and finances. Individuals facing inquiries about finances may invoke the Fifth Amendment to protect against self-incrimination. With no constitutional safeguards, understanding one’s rights in family court is essential, as the implications can be severe and life-altering.

You Have the Right to Remain Silent—Yes, Even in Family Court Read More