Investigative Journalism | Exposing What Lies Beneath
The New Yorker published an essay questioning patriotism’s cultural status, positing that expressions of national pride have become problematic due to their association with certain demographics. Critics argue this view selectively targets patriotic symbols from some groups while ignoring similar expressions from others, revealing a bias in cultural critique based on class and aesthetics.
The article discusses the shift in perception regarding media ownership among the institutional left in the U.S. It argues that selective outrage arises not from a newfound concern for press independence but from a loss of control over the media narrative. The left previously ignored ownership biases until ownership changed hands, igniting panic.
The Left Discovered Media Ownership Bias — Right When They Lost Control of the Media Read More
The current media landscape is characterized by a relentless cycle of loud, hollow reactions to events, prioritizing performance over substance. While headlines focus on superficial narratives, significant decisions affecting lives occur silently, often unnoticed. Beneath the noise lies the crucial need to seek deeper understanding, as the real stories risk being overlooked.
Waves & Tidings #1 — The Noise Machine Read More
My grandfather once faced mafia threats as a newspaper editor in New Jersey. They broke windows and sent warnings, but they never killed him. Today, after Charlie Kirk’s assassination, I wonder if his bravery would survive in modern America. Free speech is no longer just under attack — it’s under fire.
From Mafia Threats to Political Murders: What My Grandfather’s Journalism Teaches Us About America Today Read More
CBS faced criticism for editing out crucial context from DHS Secretary Kristi Noem’s comments about an MS-13 connected human smuggler. This manipulation undermines journalism’s integrity, distorts reality, and erodes public trust. Such selective reporting transforms factual news into propaganda, raising questions about CBS’s commitment to serving the public interest.
CBS’s Deceptive Editing of Kristi Noem Proves Journalism Has a Credibility Crisis Read More
Dr. Adejare Atanda, a RAND researcher, faces criticism for attacking an independent journalist using AI images instead of addressing arguments. His insults and decision to block the journalist suggest a lack of accountability. This behavior undermines RAND’s credibility and highlights a double standard in discourse between elites and independent creators.
From RAND to Rage: When a Researcher Can’t Handle Criticism Read More
Dr. Adejare Atanda, a senior researcher at RAND Corporation, critiques AI misuse yet undermines individuals using AI for creative tasks on social media. His condescending online behavior contrasts sharply with his serious professional role. This hypocrisy highlights a broader issue of elitism in the discourse surrounding AI, questioning whether experts truly understand its empowering potential.
From RAND to Random: When a Biosecurity Researcher Punches Down Over AI Images Read More
In 2025, corporate manipulation of truth has become rampant, with agrochemical giants like Monsanto (now Bayer) controlling narratives through media, PR strategies, and legal intimidation. This manipulation stifles journalism and public awareness about environmental and health crises. Transparency and accountability are essential for reclaiming truth in a compromised media landscape.
The Media is the Message—And Monsanto Paid for It: How Corporate Giants Hijack Public Discourse, Science, and Truth Read More
Since 2020, journalist Michael Phillips used Medium as a platform for impactful writing on systemic injustice. After building a loyal audience and gaining traction, his account was suspended without explanation for supposedly violating rules. He criticizes Medium’s censorship as corporate control over journalism, urging a move to platforms that uphold free speech.
The Platform That Censors the Truth: How Medium Betrayed Its Writers and Silenced My Journalism Read More
Michael Phillips highlights the troubling suspension of his journalism account by Medium without clarity on policy violations. He argues that the platform’s vague moderation policies threaten accountability, particularly for independent journalists. Medium’s practices risk censoring vital investigative work, raising concerns about digital publishing’s commitment to free speech and transparency.
Silenced Without Cause: How Medium Is Failing Journalists and Censoring Investigative Reporting Read More