Home » Legal System

When Family Court Leaves the Courtroom

The article highlights the risks parents face in private judging during family court proceedings, often unaware of its binding nature. Many experience significant pressure and confusion, leading to irreversible agreements without fully understanding the consequences. It emphasizes the need for clarity and proper legal guidance before consenting to such processes.

When Family Court Leaves the Courtroom Read More

The Hidden Market in Broken Homes: How Family Courts Became a Profit Center

The article by Michael Phillips argues that family courts and child welfare systems have evolved into profit-driven industries, prioritizing revenue over family stability. Federal laws like Title IV-D and Title IV-E incentivize conflict and child removal, creating a cycle of dependency and trauma for families. Reform is essential to shift these damaging incentives.

The Hidden Market in Broken Homes: How Family Courts Became a Profit Center Read More

Should Judges Be Elected, Appointed, or Fired?

Custody court judges wield significant power over families, often shielded from accountability. While some are appointed and others elected, both models have pitfalls. Suggestions for reform include performance audits and parental review panels to improve transparency. Ultimately, the system must ensure judges are held accountable for their decisions affecting children’s lives.

Should Judges Be Elected, Appointed, or Fired? Read More

Is It Ever Legal to Let a Child Drink? In Family Court, the Answer Depends on Who You Are.

William Sewell alleges that family court in South Carolina ignored credible evidence of his ex-wife allowing their young daughter to sip alcoholic drinks, while he faces contempt charges. This highlights systemic bias in family courts, where mothers’ behavior is often overlooked and fathers are unfairly scrutinized, undermining child safety and trust in the legal system.

Is It Ever Legal to Let a Child Drink? In Family Court, the Answer Depends on Who You Are. Read More

From Custody to Crisis: A Weekend of Violence, Grief, and Arrests

The content discusses several violent incidents related to child custody exchanges in the U.S., highlighting the associated dangers and systemic flaws within custody and child welfare systems. Cases in Florida and Person County illustrate the emotional turmoil families face, underscoring the urgent need for reforms, safety measures, and effective communication to prevent such tragedies.

From Custody to Crisis: A Weekend of Violence, Grief, and Arrests Read More

Maryland Ranks 5th Most Expensive State—And That’s Before Wes Moore’s New Fees Kick In

Maryland ranks as the fifth most expensive state in the U.S., with average monthly bills totaling $2,693. This figure does not account for various hidden taxes and fees under Governor Wes Moore’s administration, making living costs burdensome for families and small businesses. Many residents are leaving for more affordable states.

Maryland Ranks 5th Most Expensive State—And That’s Before Wes Moore’s New Fees Kick In Read More

Justice by Omission: How Family Court Covers Up Its Failures

The family court system conceals its failures by omitting crucial data, perpetuating a false narrative of fairness and effectiveness. Critical metrics on custody rulings, false accusations, and parental alienation remain untracked, creating an environment resistant to accountability. Without transparency and independent oversight, systemic issues will persist, harming families unjustly.

Justice by Omission: How Family Court Covers Up Its Failures Read More

Trump’s Executive Order Strikes at the Heart of the Regulatory State—Why Almost No One Noticed

On May 10, 2025, President Trump signed an executive order aimed at reducing the overreach of the federal regulatory system. It mandates transparency in criminal regulations, emphasizes intent in prosecutions, and advocates for clearer laws enacted by elected officials. This significant reform challenges the unchecked power of the administrative state.

Trump’s Executive Order Strikes at the Heart of the Regulatory State—Why Almost No One Noticed Read More

The Silent Convergence: How the 1990s Saw Cartel Expansion and Legal System Vulnerabilities Rise Together

In the 1990s, the rise of Mexican drug cartels and the adoption of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) in the U.S. legal system created dangerous overlaps. While cartels expanded their criminal enterprises, ADR prioritized secrecy over transparency, inadvertently enabling exploitation and corruption. This legacy continues to affect justice delivery and societal trust today.

The Silent Convergence: How the 1990s Saw Cartel Expansion and Legal System Vulnerabilities Rise Together Read More