Home » Constitutional Law

Constitutional Law
Constitutional Law / Constitutional Rights / Free Speech / Freedom of the Press / Government / Judicial / Law and Order / Law Enforcement / Laws / Religious Freedom / Rights and Freedoms

Was the Arrest of Don Lemon an Attack on the Constitution?

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The arrest of journalist Don Lemon has sparked claims of First Amendment violations from Democratic officials. However, federal authorities clarified that the arrests were tied to alleged criminal conduct related to the targeting of a church, not journalism. The First Amendment protects speech but does not exempt individuals from investigation for non-speech conduct.

Was the Arrest of Don Lemon an Attack on the Constitution? Read More
Constitutional Law / Executive Power & Civil Liberties / Government / Judicial / Laws / Supreme Court / Supreme Court

Supreme Court Declines to Hear Major Gun Rights Cases, Leaving State Restrictions Intact

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The Supreme Court has declined to hear multiple significant Second Amendment cases, maintaining diverse state gun regulations and leaving gun-rights advocates dissatisfied. This inaction permits legal disparities and delayed clarity regarding firearm policies while emphasizing a cautious judicial approach. Future Second Amendment cases may eventually return to the Court for review.

Supreme Court Declines to Hear Major Gun Rights Cases, Leaving State Restrictions Intact Read More
Constitutional Law / Domestic Policy / Domestic Policy / Explainers / Government / Government / Government Power / Immigration / Judicial / Law & Courts / Law Enforcement / Lawfare & Intelligence / Laws / Maryland / Maryland Watch / Money & Incentives

Legal Risk Explainer: Federal Preemption and Funding Exposure in Local ICE Restrictions

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Local governments, like Montgomery County, face legal risks when restricting cooperation with federal immigration enforcement, particularly regarding federal preemption and funding exposure. While they can non-cooperate, crossing into obstruction invites lawsuits and potential funding cuts. This situation underscores a national trend, affecting local jurisdictions’ autonomy and creating varied immigration enforcement across the country.

Legal Risk Explainer: Federal Preemption and Funding Exposure in Local ICE Restrictions Read More
Constitutional Law / Government / Immigration / Judicial / Law and Order / Law Enforcement / Lawfare & Intelligence / Laws / Minnesota / National Affairs / Politics

DOJ Investigation Into Minnesota Leaders Raises Serious Questions About Law, Rhetoric, and Responsibility

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The Department of Justice has opened a criminal investigation into Minnesota’s top Democratic leaders, raising serious questions about rhetoric, law enforcement obstruction, and the limits of sanctuary politics.

DOJ Investigation Into Minnesota Leaders Raises Serious Questions About Law, Rhetoric, and Responsibility Read More
Civil Unrest / Constitutional Law / Crime Violence / Government / Law and Order / Law Enforcement / Laws / Political Violence / Politics

Is the Law Outdated When Elected Officials Incite Violence?

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

When elected officials use inflammatory rhetoric during moments of unrest, the law often looks the other way. Is America’s incitement standard outdated—or working as intended?

Is the Law Outdated When Elected Officials Incite Violence? Read More
Constitutional Law / Constitutional Rights / Federal Court / Government / Government Watch / Judges / Judicial / Politics

Roberts’ Year-End Report: A Quiet Defense of Judicial Independence Ahead of America’s 250th Anniversary

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

In his 2025 Year-End Report, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. emphasizes judicial independence as essential to the Constitution, framing the judiciary as a counter-majoritarian check rooted in American history. He reflects on past principles rather than current controversies, reinforcing the judiciary’s role in upholding the rule of law amidst political strife.

Roberts’ Year-End Report: A Quiet Defense of Judicial Independence Ahead of America’s 250th Anniversary Read More
Constitutional Law / Constitutional Rights / Federal / Government / Supreme Court / Supreme Court

Supreme Court Declines to Hear Challenge to Federal Marijuana Ban, Leaving Policy Fight to the Executive Branch

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The U.S. Supreme Court’s refusal to hear Canna Provisions v. Bondi leaves marijuana illegal federally, despite state legalization. The case challenged the Controlled Substances Act as unconstitutional, but the Court’s silence maintains federal authority over states. With legal avenues closed, attention shifts to potential executive action for marijuana rescheduling.

Supreme Court Declines to Hear Challenge to Federal Marijuana Ban, Leaving Policy Fight to the Executive Branch Read More
Constitutional Law / Federal Court / Judicial / Policy / Politics / Supreme Court

Trump v. Slaughter: The Supreme Court Case That Could Rewire Presidential Power — and America’s System of Administrative Justice Along With It

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The Supreme Court case Trump v. Slaughter threatens the independence of various regulatory agencies by potentially overturning the precedent set by Humphrey’s Executor. The outcome could grant presidents at-will removal authority over agency commissioners, reshape administrative courts, and diminish judicial oversight, leading to increased regulatory uncertainty and political influence over enforcement actions.

Trump v. Slaughter: The Supreme Court Case That Could Rewire Presidential Power — and America’s System of Administrative Justice Along With It Read More
Constitutional Law / Government / Government / Government Reform / Politics / Supreme Court / Supreme Court

The Great Constitutional Correction: How Courts Are Re-Drawing the Lines of Power

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Recent court cases across the U.S. are reshaping governmental authority, challenging the power dynamics between Congress, the President, and unelected agencies. The Rhode Island case signifies a judicial push to restore constitutional balance by questioning executive overreach and emergency powers. This movement aims to reestablish accountability within American governance structures.

The Great Constitutional Correction: How Courts Are Re-Drawing the Lines of Power Read More
Ada Accommodations / Beyond Barriers and Disability Rights / California / California Watch / Civil Rights / Civil Rights / Constitutional Law / Constitutional Rights / Court Reform / Crime & Violence / Disability / Disability Rights / Disability Rights / Due Process Denied / Family Court / Legal Reform / Misconduct / San Marcos Abduction Attempt / The Smiel Series

Inside People v. Smiel: When Process Becomes the Story

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Giselle Smiel faces five felonies, including kidnapping, for picking up her crying child at a San Diego school. Her defense argues there was no force or substantial movement, pointing to lack of evidence and jurisdictional issues. Advocates highlight constitutional violations and ADA neglect in her arrest, seeking dismissal of charges and oversight on family-court mechanisms in criminal cases.

Inside People v. Smiel: When Process Becomes the Story Read More