Home » court transparency

When Family Court Leaves the Courtroom

The article highlights the risks parents face in private judging during family court proceedings, often unaware of its binding nature. Many experience significant pressure and confusion, leading to irreversible agreements without fully understanding the consequences. It emphasizes the need for clarity and proper legal guidance before consenting to such processes.

When Family Court Leaves the Courtroom Read More

“We Aren’t Having One of Those Today”

During a federal shutdown, a Los Angeles courtroom silenced advocates and observers during a hearing for domestic violence survivor Giselle Smiel, violating her ADA rights. Despite a provided Teams link for remote access, court staff denied participation, raising concerns over public oversight and institutional failure in providing justice and transparency for vulnerable individuals.

“We Aren’t Having One of Those Today” Read More

Family Law Reform Needs Truth, Not Dismissal: Why Chris Felder’s Comment Misses the Point

Candidates in family law reform face critical challenges as they navigate a broken system that affects countless families. Chris Felder’s comments on apathy overlook the realities of corruption and injustice that families experience. Meaningful reform demands accountability and honest acknowledgment of systemic failures, prioritizing families’ voices and needs over dismissive rhetoric.

Family Law Reform Needs Truth, Not Dismissal: Why Chris Felder’s Comment Misses the Point Read More

Lost in the Crossfire: Why Family Court Reform Struggles in America’s Political Battlefield

In America, the family court system’s corruption and dysfunction quietly devastate countless families, often ignored amid partisan conflicts. Reform requires transparency, accountability, and oversight, yet political leaders hesitate to act due to concerns over power structures. This crisis affects all sides, demanding urgent attention as it undermines justice and family stability.

Lost in the Crossfire: Why Family Court Reform Struggles in America’s Political Battlefield Read More

The Judge Who’s Missing: Why Family Courts Fail Without the Right Bench

The family court system is failing due to inadequate judges lacking neutrality, knowledge, and accountability. This leads to injustice, where truth is overlooked, and biases prevail. To reform the system, ongoing education for judges, public oversight, and independent accountability boards are essential. Justice for families is compromised until ideal judges are established.

The Judge Who’s Missing: Why Family Courts Fail Without the Right Bench Read More

“Who’s Protecting the Children?”: John Myrick Calls for Family Court Investigation in Maryland

In Maryland, gubernatorial candidate John Myrick criticizes the family court system, arguing it’s corrupt and favors financial interests over children’s welfare. He highlights how Title IV-D funding exacerbates conflicts of interest, denying parental rights and causing family separation. Myrick calls for oversight reforms to enhance accountability and protect all parents’ rights.

“Who’s Protecting the Children?”: John Myrick Calls for Family Court Investigation in Maryland Read More

Twelve Motions Denied: The Systematic Erosion of Rights in Sewell’s Case

The Sewell v. Sewell case illustrates a troubling pattern within the South Carolina Family Court, where twelve motions filed by William Sewell seeking justice were uniformly denied without adequate explanation. This systemic denial of due process highlights a court environment prioritizing power over fairness, leaving vulnerable parties without legal recourse or representation.

Twelve Motions Denied: The Systematic Erosion of Rights in Sewell’s Case Read More

The Final Order: How Judge Mandy Kimmons Sealed William Sewell’s Fate

The Sewell v. Sewell case highlights judicial bias and misconduct in a custody trial led by Judge Mandy Kimmons. The ruling benefited opposing attorney Donnie Gamache, disregarded William Sewell’s rights, and imposed unfair financial penalties. This case exemplifies systemic issues in family courts, necessitating immediate investigations and reforms to protect litigants’ rights.

The Final Order: How Judge Mandy Kimmons Sealed William Sewell’s Fate Read More

When the Court Punishes the Cry for Help: Why Speaking Out Isn’t Contempt — It’s Courage

The family court system often prioritizes secrecy and power over justice, leaving parents feeling unheard and desperate. When they speak out, it’s typically to expose serious concerns about child safety. Instead of being punished, these parents should be supported, as their pleas indicate systemic failures that threaten their children’s well-being.

When the Court Punishes the Cry for Help: Why Speaking Out Isn’t Contempt — It’s Courage Read More

Justice Denied: The Impeachment Files

Janice Wolk Grenadier is challenging Chief Justice John G. Roberts over the upcoming private gala at the Supreme Court, which she argues symbolizes elitism in the judiciary. She filed a Petition for Impeachment citing constitutional violations and calling for Congress to act against the growing disconnect between the legal elite and ordinary citizens.

Justice Denied: The Impeachment Files Read More