Home » court transparency

Tag: court transparency
3 - Investigations / 4 - Cases / Ada Accommodations / Beyond Barriers and Disability Rights / Brenna Gano Case / California / California Watch / Child Custody / Child Custody / Disability / Disability Rights / Disability Rights / Family Court / Family Court Reform / The California Custody Cartel

The Judge Who Wasn’t Ready

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Judge Vivian Wang, recently appointed with no family law experience, denied motions in a complex custody case involving alleged fraud and disability accommodations. Critics argue her procedural ruling lacked thorough legal analysis, particularly regarding limitations and equitable tolling. The upcoming trial may test her judicial capabilities and the fairness of the process.

The Judge Who Wasn’t Ready Read More
2 - Analysis / 3 - Investigations / Circuit Court / Civil Court / Civil Rights / Civil Rights / Court Corruption / Court Reform / Domestic Policy / Family Court / Family Court Reform / Government / Institutions / Institutions & Accountability / Justice & Governance / Maryland / Maryland Watch

No One Is Watching: How Montgomery County’s Family Court Operates Without External Oversight, and What Happens to the People Who Notice

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

An investigation reveals a significant accountability gap in Maryland’s family court system, where civil rights complaints against judges lack external oversight and transparency. Complaints filed are often sealed and unreported, leading to systemic noncompliance without recourse for litigants. This raises critical issues about judicial accountability and the structures that enable potential misconduct.

No One Is Watching: How Montgomery County’s Family Court Operates Without External Oversight, and What Happens to the People Who Notice Read More
3 - Investigations / Child Custody / Child Custody / Court Corruption / Family Court / Family Court Reform / Institutions / Legal Reform / Maryland Watch / The Reichert Files

A Father’s Silence: How Jeffrey Reichert Lost His Son to a System That Stopped Listening

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Jeffrey Reichert hasn’t seen his son since 2022. Every criminal charge filed against him failed. Yet he lost custody—and contact. This investigation examines how it happened, and what it reveals about Maryland’s family court system.

A Father’s Silence: How Jeffrey Reichert Lost His Son to a System That Stopped Listening Read More
3 - Investigations / 4 - Cases / Brenna Gano Case / California / Family Court / Family Court Reform / Institutions

When Family Court Leaves the Courtroom

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The article highlights the risks parents face in private judging during family court proceedings, often unaware of its binding nature. Many experience significant pressure and confusion, leading to irreversible agreements without fully understanding the consequences. It emphasizes the need for clarity and proper legal guidance before consenting to such processes.

When Family Court Leaves the Courtroom Read More
Accountability / Ada Accommodations / Beyond Barriers and Disability Rights / California / California Watch / Disability / Disability Rights / Disability Rights / Domestic Violence / Due Process Denied / Family Court / San Marcos Abduction Attempt / The Smiel Series / transparency

“We Aren’t Having One of Those Today”

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

During a federal shutdown, a Los Angeles courtroom silenced advocates and observers during a hearing for domestic violence survivor Giselle Smiel, violating her ADA rights. Despite a provided Teams link for remote access, court staff denied participation, raising concerns over public oversight and institutional failure in providing justice and transparency for vulnerable individuals.

“We Aren’t Having One of Those Today” Read More
Campaigns / Child Custody / Corruption / Court Corruption / Court Reform / Elections / Family Court / Family Court Reform / Florida / Legal Reform / Parental Rights / Politics / The Corruption Series

Family Law Reform Needs Truth, Not Dismissal: Why Chris Felder’s Comment Misses the Point

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Candidates in family law reform face critical challenges as they navigate a broken system that affects countless families. Chris Felder’s comments on apathy overlook the realities of corruption and injustice that families experience. Meaningful reform demands accountability and honest acknowledgment of systemic failures, prioritizing families’ voices and needs over dismissive rhetoric.

Family Law Reform Needs Truth, Not Dismissal: Why Chris Felder’s Comment Misses the Point Read More
Child Custody / Child Custody / Child Protective Services / Child Support / Child Support / Child Trafficking / Constitutional Rights / Corruption / Court Corruption / Due Process Denied / Family Court / Family Court Reform / Family Values / Government / parental rights / Politics

Lost in the Crossfire: Why Family Court Reform Struggles in America’s Political Battlefield

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

In America, the family court system’s corruption and dysfunction quietly devastate countless families, often ignored amid partisan conflicts. Reform requires transparency, accountability, and oversight, yet political leaders hesitate to act due to concerns over power structures. This crisis affects all sides, demanding urgent attention as it undermines justice and family stability.

Lost in the Crossfire: Why Family Court Reform Struggles in America’s Political Battlefield Read More
bias / Child Custody / Child Custody / Child Support / Child Support / Corruption / Court Corruption / Family Court / Family Court Reform / Judges / Judicial / Judicial Disability / Misconduct / parental rights

The Judge Who’s Missing: Why Family Courts Fail Without the Right Bench

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The family court system is failing due to inadequate judges lacking neutrality, knowledge, and accountability. This leads to injustice, where truth is overlooked, and biases prevail. To reform the system, ongoing education for judges, public oversight, and independent accountability boards are essential. Justice for families is compromised until ideal judges are established.

The Judge Who’s Missing: Why Family Courts Fail Without the Right Bench Read More
2026 Election Cycle / 2026 Elections Cycle / Accountability / Advocacy / Campaigns / Child Custody / Child Custody / Child Protective Services / Child Support / Child Support / elections / Family Court / Family Court Reform / GOP / Government / Government / Governor / Maryland / Maryland Watch / Politics

“Who’s Protecting the Children?”: John Myrick Calls for Family Court Investigation in Maryland

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

In Maryland, gubernatorial candidate John Myrick criticizes the family court system, arguing it’s corrupt and favors financial interests over children’s welfare. He highlights how Title IV-D funding exacerbates conflicts of interest, denying parental rights and causing family separation. Myrick calls for oversight reforms to enhance accountability and protect all parents’ rights.

“Who’s Protecting the Children?”: John Myrick Calls for Family Court Investigation in Maryland Read More
Accountability / Child Custody / Child Custody / Child Protective Services / Child Support / Child Support / Civil Rights / Constitutional Rights / Corruption / Court Corruption / Court Of Ruin The William Sewell Files / Family Court / Family Court Reform / Father's Rights / parental rights / Rights and Freedoms / South Carolina / South Carolina Watch / The Corruption Series

Twelve Motions Denied: The Systematic Erosion of Rights in Sewell’s Case

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The Sewell v. Sewell case illustrates a troubling pattern within the South Carolina Family Court, where twelve motions filed by William Sewell seeking justice were uniformly denied without adequate explanation. This systemic denial of due process highlights a court environment prioritizing power over fairness, leaving vulnerable parties without legal recourse or representation.

Twelve Motions Denied: The Systematic Erosion of Rights in Sewell’s Case Read More