Home » supreme court decisions

The Court Keeps Choosing the Same Referee

The Supreme Court’s recent rulings reflect a trend of deference to political branches over judicial scrutiny. In cases involving federal agency independence and transgender athletes in sports, the Court prioritized legislative judgment over judicial fact-finding. This selective application of judicial restraint raises concerns about consistency in adjudicating contested factual questions across different contexts.

The Court Keeps Choosing the Same Referee Read More

Feeding From the System: Judge Harry Storm’s Retirement Gig Exposes the Real Engine Behind Family Court Corruption

Judge Harry Storm’s retirement marks not an end to injustice but a transition to a lucrative role in Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), where he profits from family distress. This illustrates a broader issue: family courts prioritize profit over justice, perpetuating a system that undermines due process and exploits vulnerable families.

Feeding From the System: Judge Harry Storm’s Retirement Gig Exposes the Real Engine Behind Family Court Corruption Read More