Home » Family Law

Nobody Asked Grant

Grant Reichert’s communication has been restricted by his mother, Sarah Hornbeck, and John Michel, resulting in a protective order against him without his consent. Supervised visitation has become difficult, raising concerns about his well-being. Witness testimonies suggest he desires contact with his father. Ongoing litigation raises questions about manipulation and parental control dynamics.

Nobody Asked Grant Read More

THE MONTHS NOBODY MENTIONS

June highlights important issues like National Men’s Health Month and National PTSD Awareness Month, yet conversations around men’s health and the impact of family courts remain largely ignored. Men face significant mental health challenges, particularly related to trauma from family court experiences, but lack adequate cultural acknowledgment and support.

THE MONTHS NOBODY MENTIONS Read More

Court Denies Brenna Gano’s Motions — But Sets the Stage for Trial

A San Mateo judge rejected attempts by Brenna Gano to overturn a 2022 settlement, citing statute of limitations concerns. Gano argued she was coerced into the agreement without proper accommodations for her disabilities. While the denials were procedural, a full-day trial is set for December 28, 2026, where core issues will be examined.

Court Denies Brenna Gano’s Motions — But Sets the Stage for Trial Read More

The Federal Government Will Ground You for Unpaid Child Support. It Has No Answer for Stolen Parenting Time.

The Trump administration has activated a policy allowing passport revocation for parents owing over $2,500 in child support, impacting both responsible and negligent parents alike. This enforcement does not account for circumstances like ongoing custody battles, potentially harming parents who are fighting for access to their children rather than abandoning them.

The Federal Government Will Ground You for Unpaid Child Support. It Has No Answer for Stolen Parenting Time. Read More

When Family Court Leaves the Courtroom

The article highlights the risks parents face in private judging during family court proceedings, often unaware of its binding nature. Many experience significant pressure and confusion, leading to irreversible agreements without fully understanding the consequences. It emphasizes the need for clarity and proper legal guidance before consenting to such processes.

When Family Court Leaves the Courtroom Read More

America’s Shadow Immigration System: The Comprehensive Exposé

The Biden administration implemented a covert immigration system that allowed over 1.8 million foreign nationals entry through executive actions, bypassing Congress. This led to significant fiscal burdens, increased public costs, and national security risks. As Trump’s administration began rolling back these policies in 2025, the implications on sovereignty and legality became evident.

America’s Shadow Immigration System: The Comprehensive Exposé Read More

Weaponized FAP: How DoD’s Family Court Ends Careers and Families — Without a Trial

The Family Advocacy Program (FAP) within the military is critiqued for lacking due process, as it allows decisions on allegations to be made without the accused’s presence or counsel. This system, coupled with a high “met criteria” rate, has severe consequences on service members’ careers and well-being, often leading to irreversible harm.

Weaponized FAP: How DoD’s Family Court Ends Careers and Families — Without a Trial Read More

Maryland’s 430-Law October Surprise: Because Freedom Needed More Fine Print

Maryland enacted around 430 new laws, emphasizing compliance that often complicates citizens’ lives through increased regulations. Key areas include privacy, criminal justice, housing, work, health, and environmental policies. Despite claims of modernization and equity, these laws often lead to higher costs and bureaucratic hurdles, undermining individual freedoms and choices.

Maryland’s 430-Law October Surprise: Because Freedom Needed More Fine Print Read More

Why Do Marriage Licenses Still Exist? A Contract of Adhesion Between Citizens and the State

Marriage has evolved from a sacred covenant to a state-controlled contract requiring a license. This shift began in the 1920s, giving the government authority over personal unions. Justifications for licensing have collapsed over time, revealing it as a tool for revenue and control, undermining family stability and personal freedom.

Why Do Marriage Licenses Still Exist? A Contract of Adhesion Between Citizens and the State Read More