Home » 3 - Investigations » Archive by State » California Watch

Inside the California Custody Cartel

Brenna Gano’s experience in California’s family court highlights a troubling system where justice is influenced by financial interests. Misled and pressured into signing agreements, she faced excessive costs and neurological biases that labeled her as unstable. Her case exemplifies a broader pattern of exploitation for profit within family court practices, jeopardizing families’ well-being.

Inside the California Custody Cartel Read More

When the Court Shrugs and Power Consolidates

The Supreme Court’s decision to allow California’s mid-decade redistricting alters the political landscape by endorsing partisan map redraws outside the traditional census cycle. This ruling raises concerns about the erosion of democratic norms, as it encourages aggressive partisan strategies that could undermine voter representation and weaken faith in the electoral system.

When the Court Shrugs and Power Consolidates Read More

The Executive Order That Changed the Equation: Trump Moves to Break California’s Rebuild Gridlock

Donald Trump’s executive order aims to expedite federal control over the Los Angeles wildfire recovery process, challenging California’s regulatory framework. It prioritizes swift rebuilding by reducing bureaucratic delays, enforcing clear timelines, and allowing emergency waivers. This intervention reflects a philosophy of action over procedure in crisis situations, highlighting governance efficiency and accountability.

The Executive Order That Changed the Equation: Trump Moves to Break California’s Rebuild Gridlock Read More

Swalwell Residency Lawsuit Raises New Questions About California’s Rules — and Who They Apply To

A legal challenge has emerged regarding Eric Swalwell’s eligibility in California’s 2026 gubernatorial race, questioning his residency status due to claims he has not lived in the state for five years. The lawsuit highlights potential issues in enforcing residency requirements and raises broader concerns about election integrity in California politics.

Swalwell Residency Lawsuit Raises New Questions About California’s Rules — and Who They Apply To Read More

The Public Has a Right to Know Whether Government Agencies Followed the Law Before Taking Someone’s Freedom.

Los Angeles and San Diego officials are withholding public records related to the prosecution of Giselle Farias Smiel, raising concerns about transparency and due process. Despite legal obligations under the California Public Records Act, agencies have issued denials and delays, undermining public trust and accountability in the justice system.

The Public Has a Right to Know Whether Government Agencies Followed the Law Before Taking Someone’s Freedom. Read More

From Safe Haven to Systemic Betrayal: How San Diego’s Polinsky Children’s Center Failed the Smiel Family

Hundreds of lawsuits, state violations, and survivor accounts paint a devastating portrait of San Diego County’s flagship children’s shelter — the same facility where Giselle Smiel’s kids were taken before being handed to their abusive father.
Polinsky’s story reveals how California’s “child-protection” pipeline can deliver children straight back into danger.

From Safe Haven to Systemic Betrayal: How San Diego’s Polinsky Children’s Center Failed the Smiel Family Read More

Inside People v. Smiel: When Process Becomes the Story

Giselle Smiel faces five felonies, including kidnapping, for picking up her crying child at a San Diego school. Her defense argues there was no force or substantial movement, pointing to lack of evidence and jurisdictional issues. Advocates highlight constitutional violations and ADA neglect in her arrest, seeking dismissal of charges and oversight on family-court mechanisms in criminal cases.

Inside People v. Smiel: When Process Becomes the Story Read More

“We Aren’t Having One of Those Today”

During a federal shutdown, a Los Angeles courtroom silenced advocates and observers during a hearing for domestic violence survivor Giselle Smiel, violating her ADA rights. Despite a provided Teams link for remote access, court staff denied participation, raising concerns over public oversight and institutional failure in providing justice and transparency for vulnerable individuals.

“We Aren’t Having One of Those Today” Read More

The Records They Wouldn’t Release — and the Mother They Jailed

The case of Giselle Smiel highlights significant issues of transparency and jurisdictional failures in California’s justice system. After a May 2025 incident involving alleged child abduction, Smiel faced six felony charges despite having no criminal history. Denied access to public records and effective legal representation, she remains in jail, raising concerns over systemic accountability and due process.

The Records They Wouldn’t Release — and the Mother They Jailed Read More