Home » Federal Courts

No Verdict: Twenty-Five Years On, the 9/11 “Trial of the Century” Still Hasn’t Started

Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, identified as the 9/11 attacks’ mastermind, was captured in 2003 but remains in pretrial proceedings at Guantanamo Bay, now targeting a trial date of June 2028. The case has faced numerous delays and legal complications, including issues stemming from previous torture during CIA custody, significantly complicating prosecution.

No Verdict: Twenty-Five Years On, the 9/11 “Trial of the Century” Still Hasn’t Started Read More

USPS Finalizes New Mail-Ballot Tracking Rules — Now Voting Groups Want a Judge to Stop Them Again

The U.S. Postal Service has finalized a rule regarding mail-in and absentee ballots for federal elections, requiring standardized preparation and tracking. This rule, which does not determine voter eligibility, faces legal challenges due to an existing injunction. The outcome may impact mail voting in the upcoming November midterms.

USPS Finalizes New Mail-Ballot Tracking Rules — Now Voting Groups Want a Judge to Stop Them Again Read More

The Court Killed the Trade War. Now What?

The Supreme Court invalidated Trump’s trade war tariffs, stating the International Emergency Economic Powers Act did not authorize such actions. This ruling revealed a lack of legal foundation for Trump’s tariff regime, leading to significant job losses and financial uncertainty. The replacement strategy faces impending expiration and political scrutiny during the 2026 elections.

The Court Killed the Trade War. Now What? Read More

Is There a Real Problem at DHS, or Just Partisan Defiance?

Recent federal court rulings criticize the Department of Homeland Security and Immigration and Customs Enforcement for constitutional violations, notably obstructing detainees’ access to legal counsel. This governmental overreach raises concerns regarding accountability and legal compliance. Both sides of the political spectrum must address these institutional issues to uphold the rule of law effectively.

Is There a Real Problem at DHS, or Just Partisan Defiance? Read More

Judge Blocks California’s Mask Ban for Federal Officers

A federal judge has temporarily blocked a California law restricting facial coverings for law enforcement, citing potential violations of the Constitution’s Supremacy Clause. The ruling allows federal agents to continue using facial coverings while maintaining a transparency measure for non-uniformed officers. California may appeal the decision, which highlights tensions between state and federal authority.

Judge Blocks California’s Mask Ban for Federal Officers Read More

Court Allows Alaska Energy Exploration to Proceed — A Win for Energy Reality Over Regulatory Paralysis

A federal court ruling has advanced energy exploration in Alaska, indicating a shift in U.S. energy policy from regulatory gridlock to pragmatism. The court upheld federal approvals, rejecting lawsuits that delay development without proven environmental harm. This decision highlights the importance of domestic energy independence and the balance between environmental protection and development.

Court Allows Alaska Energy Exploration to Proceed — A Win for Energy Reality Over Regulatory Paralysis Read More

Missouri AG Challenges Census Counting of Illegal Aliens in Landmark Election Lawsuit

Missouri Attorney General Catherine L. Hanaway has filed a federal lawsuit challenging the inclusion of undocumented immigrants in the U.S. Census for political representation. The suit claims this practice dilutes citizens’ voting power, unlawfully affects congressional apportionment, and seeks to prohibit counting non-citizens in future censuses. The outcome could redefine political representation in the U.S.

Missouri AG Challenges Census Counting of Illegal Aliens in Landmark Election Lawsuit Read More

Federal Judge Limits DHS After Minneapolis Shooting — A Necessary Check or Dangerous Overreach?

A federal judge has issued a restraining order against the Department of Homeland Security following a deadly shooting involving federal agents in Minneapolis, forcing the agency to preserve evidence and submit to judicial oversight. The move underscores a growing clash between federal enforcement power and constitutional accountability.

Federal Judge Limits DHS After Minneapolis Shooting — A Necessary Check or Dangerous Overreach? Read More

Federal Enforcement of Civil Rights Means Protecting Americans, Not Political Points

A federal court sentenced a North Carolina man to prison for threatening violence against restaurant patrons based on race, religion, and national origin. The case reinforces a simple principle: civil rights enforcement isn’t about ideology — it’s about protecting Americans from intimidation and upholding public safety under the rule of law.

Federal Enforcement of Civil Rights Means Protecting Americans, Not Political Points Read More

Fentanyl Trafficker Sentenced as Federal Crackdown Targets Drug Networks and Dirty Money

A New Jersey man has been sentenced to federal prison for fentanyl distribution and money laundering, highlighting the Justice Department’s strategy to dismantle drug trafficking networks and their financial support. The case emphasizes accountability for high-level offenders and signals a shift in tackling fentanyl as a national security issue.

Fentanyl Trafficker Sentenced as Federal Crackdown Targets Drug Networks and Dirty Money Read More