Home » Legal Advocacy

Justice Cannot Be Blind to Invisible Disabilities

Maryland courts are increasingly denying ADA accommodation requests for individuals with invisible disabilities, leading to severe consequences. Judges are making medical determinations without proper evaluations, overshadowing federal law. This systemic failure calls for reforms including empowered ADA coordinators, necessary written responses, independent oversight, and better judicial training to honor ADA rights effectively.

Justice Cannot Be Blind to Invisible Disabilities Read More

What Would It Have Taken to Get a Fair Trial?

The article critiques the unfair trial experienced by William Sewell in a South Carolina family court. It outlines the essential legal safeguards denied to him, such as a neutral judge, access to counsel, equitable discovery, and protection from retaliation. Without these safeguards, the article argues, due process is compromised for self-represented parents across America.

What Would It Have Taken to Get a Fair Trial? Read More

Democrats Outraged Over One Arrest — But Where Was Their Outrage for the Rest of Us?

The arrest of Senator Alex Padilla during a protest has sparked outrage among Democrats, with Representative Jamie Raskin condemning it as authoritarian. However, Maryland veteran Jeff Reichert highlights hypocrisy, recalling his own wrongful arrests amid silence from the party. He emphasizes that justice should apply universally, not just for political gain.

Democrats Outraged Over One Arrest — But Where Was Their Outrage for the Rest of Us? Read More

Where to Report Family Court Injustice: A Citizen’s Guide to Submitting Tips and Complaints

The article by Michael Phillips highlights the prevalence of injustices in family courts, including constitutional rights violations and misconduct by judges and court professionals. It encourages affected parents to report such abuses to appropriate agencies, including the DOJ, FBI, and state judicial commissions, to foster accountability and promote systemic change.

Where to Report Family Court Injustice: A Citizen’s Guide to Submitting Tips and Complaints Read More

A Voice for Justice: How Jeff Reichert Turned to an ADA Advocate to Defend His Rights and Protect His Son

Jeff Reichert has engaged an independent ADA advocate, Janice Wolk Grenadier, to address alleged discrimination and procedural failures in his custody battle. Her letter calls for judicial accountability, an investigation into jurisdictional misconduct, enforcement of past court orders, and safeguarding the rights of both Grant and Jeff during a flawed legal process.

A Voice for Justice: How Jeff Reichert Turned to an ADA Advocate to Defend His Rights and Protect His Son Read More

The Lawless Bench: Judge Michelle Schauer’s Federal Rights Violations Against a Disabled Father Must Be Investigated

Westchester County Family Court Judge Michelle I. Schauer has unlawfully restricted disabled father Marc Fishman’s access to his twin sons’ school records, violating federal laws like FERPA and the ADA. This act reflects judicial overreach and potential discrimination, prompting calls for federal intervention and accountability for the judge and associated legal entities.

The Lawless Bench: Judge Michelle Schauer’s Federal Rights Violations Against a Disabled Father Must Be Investigated Read More

Maryland and Virginia Need Their Own TRUST Act: It’s Time to Pull Back the Curtain on Judicial Bias

Texas has introduced the TRUST Act to enhance judicial transparency by requiring judges to disclose financial contributions from parties appearing in their courts. This initiative addresses concerns over bias due to political contributions, aiming to restore public confidence in the legal system. Maryland and Virginia should adopt similar measures to ensure fairness and accountability in their judiciary.

Maryland and Virginia Need Their Own TRUST Act: It’s Time to Pull Back the Curtain on Judicial Bias Read More

Maryland and Virginia Need Their Own TRUST Act: It’s Time to Pull Back the Curtain on Judicial Bias

Texas’ TRUST Act mandates judges disclose campaign contributions and financial support from parties appearing in court, enhancing transparency and restoring public faith in the judicial system. Maryland and Virginia lack similar transparency measures, raising concerns about bias and favoritism. Introducing a TRUST Act in these states would promote fairness and accountability.

Maryland and Virginia Need Their Own TRUST Act: It’s Time to Pull Back the Curtain on Judicial Bias Read More