Home » Court Overreach

Conover v. Conover (2016): How Maryland Courts Redefined Parenthood at the Expense of Parents

In 2016, Maryland’s Conover v. Conover recognized “de facto parents,” posing a threat to biological parents’ rights by allowing non-parents equal standing in custody disputes without proving parental unfitness. This conflicted with the Supreme Court’s Troxel ruling, which prioritized parental autonomy, creating legal uncertainties and increasing litigation in family courts.

Conover v. Conover (2016): How Maryland Courts Redefined Parenthood at the Expense of Parents Read More

Dragging Feet or Leading Wisely? Why Moore and Brown Are Right to Pause on “Clean Cars” Lawsuit

The article by Michael Phillips defends Maryland Governor Wes Moore and Attorney General Anthony Brown’s decision to refrain from joining a lawsuit against Trump’s repeal of California’s vehicle emissions waiver. It argues that this restraint respects federalism and recognizes the challenges facing working families, emphasizing that effective governance sometimes requires patience and strategic caution in environmental policies.

Dragging Feet or Leading Wisely? Why Moore and Brown Are Right to Pause on “Clean Cars” Lawsuit Read More

The Lawless Bench: Judge Michelle Schauer’s Federal Rights Violations Against a Disabled Father Must Be Investigated

Westchester County Family Court Judge Michelle I. Schauer has unlawfully restricted disabled father Marc Fishman’s access to his twin sons’ school records, violating federal laws like FERPA and the ADA. This act reflects judicial overreach and potential discrimination, prompting calls for federal intervention and accountability for the judge and associated legal entities.

The Lawless Bench: Judge Michelle Schauer’s Federal Rights Violations Against a Disabled Father Must Be Investigated Read More