Home » Topics » Family Court » Domestic Violence

The Same Tools

The article examines how tactics for controlling partners in marriage are mirrored in family court environments, highlighting systemic failures to recognize and address coercive control. Through multiple cases, it illustrates how these controlling behaviors persist in legal proceedings, resulting in devastating outcomes for parents and children, often exacerbated by institutional biases and inadequate judicial training.

The Same Tools Read More

The Standard Nobody Published: Maryland’s Amended Protective Order Law, Eight Years Without a Reported Case

A Maryland custody case once made law. Then, over six years and five more appeals, Reichert v. Hornbeck generated a body of unreported family-law rulings that resolved recurring questions but never entered the state’s published precedent. This article examines what that means for litigants, lawyers, and the public.
Grounded in the article’s opening and its explanation of the five unreported opinions and their impact.

The Standard Nobody Published: Maryland’s Amended Protective Order Law, Eight Years Without a Reported Case Read More

Hornbeck’s Panic Play: Motion to Dismiss Filed Days After Deposition Raised Questions About Basis for Criminal Charges

Sarah Hornbeck has filed a Motion to Dismiss in the federal case Reichert v. Hornbeck after a deposition where she faltered under questioning regarding the evidence for her criminal charges against ex-husband Jeff Reichert. Critics claim her motion is a desperate attempt to avoid accountability in a long custody battle that alienated Reichert from their son.

Hornbeck’s Panic Play: Motion to Dismiss Filed Days After Deposition Raised Questions About Basis for Criminal Charges Read More

From Safe Haven to Systemic Betrayal: How San Diego’s Polinsky Children’s Center Failed the Smiel Family

Hundreds of lawsuits, state violations, and survivor accounts paint a devastating portrait of San Diego County’s flagship children’s shelter — the same facility where Giselle Smiel’s kids were taken before being handed to their abusive father.
Polinsky’s story reveals how California’s “child-protection” pipeline can deliver children straight back into danger.

From Safe Haven to Systemic Betrayal: How San Diego’s Polinsky Children’s Center Failed the Smiel Family Read More

“We Aren’t Having One of Those Today”

During a federal shutdown, a Los Angeles courtroom silenced advocates and observers during a hearing for domestic violence survivor Giselle Smiel, violating her ADA rights. Despite a provided Teams link for remote access, court staff denied participation, raising concerns over public oversight and institutional failure in providing justice and transparency for vulnerable individuals.

“We Aren’t Having One of Those Today” Read More

The Records They Wouldn’t Release — and the Mother They Jailed

The case of Giselle Smiel highlights significant issues of transparency and jurisdictional failures in California’s justice system. After a May 2025 incident involving alleged child abduction, Smiel faced six felony charges despite having no criminal history. Denied access to public records and effective legal representation, she remains in jail, raising concerns over systemic accountability and due process.

The Records They Wouldn’t Release — and the Mother They Jailed Read More

The Missing Eyes in Family Court: How Lack of Transparency Jailed a Survivor

Family courts claim to protect children, but secrecy has turned them into weapons against the very parents who seek safety. In California, survivor Giselle Smiel cared for her children alone for five years—only to lose them to an abusive ex after missing one hearing during her son’s medical emergency. Now she sits in jail on six felony charges, without transcripts, without ADA accommodations, and without transparency. Her case proves what advocates like Renata DeMello have long warned: until the public can see inside family court, justice will remain out of reach.

The Missing Eyes in Family Court: How Lack of Transparency Jailed a Survivor Read More

A Custody Dispute Turns Deadly in Detroit: What This Tragedy Says About Family Breakdown

A custody handoff on a Detroit street ended with one man dead and another wounded. Beyond the crime scene tape lies a deeper crisis: family courts that fuel conflict, custody disputes left unsupervised, and a culture that treats family as disposable. Unless reforms take root, this tragedy will not be the last.

A Custody Dispute Turns Deadly in Detroit: What This Tragedy Says About Family Breakdown Read More

Iryna Zorutska’s Murder: The Deadly Cost of Soft-on-Crime Justice

The murder of Iryna Zorutska is not just a senseless act of violence—it is the latest example of what happens when violent offenders are cycled through a justice system more concerned with ideology than safety. From bail reform to diversion programs, soft-on-crime policies leave women and families exposed, while abusers and repeat offenders learn to game the system. Until public safety comes first, tragedies like Zorutska’s will keep repeating.

Iryna Zorutska’s Murder: The Deadly Cost of Soft-on-Crime Justice Read More