Home » Legal Ethics

Tag: Legal Ethics
3 - Investigations / 4 - Cases / Brenna Gano Case / California / California Watch / Child Custody / Child Custody / Family Court / Government / RICO/Racketeering / The California Custody Cartel

The San Mateo Syndicate

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

A document-driven investigation reveals how a tightly connected network of lawyers, therapists, and a private judge operated inside a single custody case—coordinating decisions, shaping evidence, and extracting more than $350,000 while independent advocacy became nearly impossible.

The San Mateo Syndicate Read More
2 - Analysis / Civil Rights / Civil Rights / Crime & Violence / Crime Violence / Criminal / Family Court / Family Values / Government / Government / Mental Health / Virginia

THE ADVOCATE’S COLLAPSE

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Justin Fairfax built a second act exposing institutional failure. But his role in the Donovon Lynch case, a collapsing legal fight at home, and mounting personal pressure tell a more complicated story—one that ended in irreversible tragedy.

THE ADVOCATE’S COLLAPSE Read More
Accountability / Attorneys / Attorneys / Constitutional Rights / DOJ / Due Process Denied / Government / Judges / Opinion / Politics / Voice

“Evidence, Not Ideology” — If Only the ABA Lived By Its Own Words

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The American Bar Association (ABA) recently advocated for evidence-based justice while criticizing political influences. However, it faces accusations of selective outrage and inconsistency regarding its principles. The ABA’s historical silence on systemic injustices raises doubts about its commitment to neutrality. True reform requires the ABA to uphold its stated values across all cases.

“Evidence, Not Ideology” — If Only the ABA Lived By Its Own Words Read More
Court Corruption / Judges / Judicial Disability / The Corruption Series / Thunder's Wall of Shame / Virginia / Virginia Watch

Behind the Gavel: Scrutinizing Judge Penney Azcarate Beyond the Headlines

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Judge Penney Azcarate gained fame during the Depp-Heard trial but faces criticism for her family court practices in Virginia. Critics claim her decisions may hinder victims seeking justice, citing concerns over judicial conduct that balance her praised veterans’ advocacy against allegations of courtroom mismanagement and bias. Ongoing scrutiny suggests a complex legacy.

Behind the Gavel: Scrutinizing Judge Penney Azcarate Beyond the Headlines Read More
Attorneys / Child Custody / Civil Rights / Court Of Ruin The William Sewell Files / Court Reform / Cps / Family Court / Judicial Disability / Mental Health / South Carolina

Justice Under Siege – How the System Crushes Those Who Speak Out

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Part 12 of “Court of Ruin” addresses systemic injustice in South Carolina’s family court, focusing on reform proposals to enhance oversight, transparency, and accountability. It emphasizes the necessity of independent reviews, fair legal representation, and protections for whistleblowers, culminating in a call to action for collective change in a broken system.

Justice Under Siege – How the System Crushes Those Who Speak Out Read More
Advocacy / Constitutional Law / Constitutional Rights / Family Court / Judicial Disability / Politics

Legal Malpractice, Immunity, and the Family Court Racket: The Untouchable Industry Destroying Families

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The American legal system, particularly in family courts, has deteriorated into a profit-driven industry characterized by corruption, lack of accountability, and malpractice. Judges and attorneys often operate without consequences, perpetuating harm to families, especially fathers. Reform requires exposure and challenging corrupt practices, as true justice remains elusive in this system.

Legal Malpractice, Immunity, and the Family Court Racket: The Untouchable Industry Destroying Families Read More
Corruption / Court Reform / Family Court / New Jersey / Politics

Back in the Game: Why New Jersey’s Decision to Reinstate Disbarred Lawyers Should Outrage Every American

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The New Jersey Supreme Court’s recent ruling allows disbarred lawyers, including those convicted of theft and fraud, to seek reinstatement after five years. This decision underscores a justice system that favors professionals while punishing ordinary citizens for minor errors. Advocates call for accountability and transparency in legal reinstatements.

Back in the Game: Why New Jersey’s Decision to Reinstate Disbarred Lawyers Should Outrage Every American Read More
Adr / Family Court / Judges / New York / The Fishman Files / Uncategorized

When Judges Judge Their Own Cases: Why Recusal Rules Fail in Family Court

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

In America’s family courts, the principle that no one should be a judge in their own case is often violated. The case of Marc Fishman highlights this issue, as Judge Michelle I. Schauer, with a contentious history with Fishman, asserts control over his custody case despite allegations of bias and ethical concerns, undermining judicial impartiality.

When Judges Judge Their Own Cases: Why Recusal Rules Fail in Family Court Read More