Home » Administrative State

Tag: Administrative State
2 - Analysis / Constitutional Law / Constitutional Rights / Dead Reckoning / Judicial / Politics / Politics / Supreme Court / Supreme Court

The Court Keeps Choosing the Same Referee

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The Supreme Court’s recent rulings reflect a trend of deference to political branches over judicial scrutiny. In cases involving federal agency independence and transgender athletes in sports, the Court prioritized legislative judgment over judicial fact-finding. This selective application of judicial restraint raises concerns about consistency in adjudicating contested factual questions across different contexts.

The Court Keeps Choosing the Same Referee Read More
2 - Analysis / Constitutional Law / Dead Reckoning / Judicial / Lawfare & Intelligence / Laws / Politics / Politics / Politics & Power / Supreme Court / Supreme Court

They Built the Cage, Then Complained When Someone Else Got the Key

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The Supreme Court’s recent ruling allows Donald Trump to dismiss independent agency commissioners at will, overturning a 90-year precedent. This shift exposes the political nature of such agencies, historically insulated to advance particular agendas. The decision reinforces presidential accountability, increasing the political stakes in agency actions and prioritizing electoral responsibility.

They Built the Cage, Then Complained When Someone Else Got the Key Read More
Government / Opinion / Politics / Politics & Power / Power / Voice

The Real Threat Isn’t Presidential Power—It’s an Unaccountable Bureaucracy

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The Washington Post’s opinion asserts that President Trump’s dismissal of officials threatens democracy, bolstered by a careless Supreme Court. However, the argument is flawed, as Article II clearly grants executive power to the president. True democracy demands accountability, not bureaucratic permanence, with elections ensuring responsible governance.

The Real Threat Isn’t Presidential Power—It’s an Unaccountable Bureaucracy Read More
Domestic Policy / Government / Government Accountability / Justice & Governance / Opinion / Politics / Voice

What Is Actually Happening in American Institutions Right Now (And Why Everyone Feels It)

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

American institutions are undergoing a fundamental shift, leading to rising distrust and frustration. Power has become centralized, with decisions made by distant systems rather than accountable actors, causing people to feel powerless and ignored. As this unfolds, alternative systems emerge, and calls for transparency grow, highlighting a critical moment for trust in governance.

What Is Actually Happening in American Institutions Right Now (And Why Everyone Feels It) Read More
Executive / Federal / Federal Court / Government / Politics / Supreme Court / Supreme Court

The Middle-Ground Earthquake: How the Supreme Court’s Trump v. Slaughter Transcript Reveals a Quietly Radical Plan for the Administrative State

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The Supreme Court’s deliberation in Trump v. Slaughter suggests a strategic ruling that may preserve the name of Humphrey’s Executor while limiting its impact. This could redefine agency independence and empower presidents to dismiss officials without judicial remedy, fundamentally altering the relationship between the presidency and administrative agencies, with significant long-term implications.

The Middle-Ground Earthquake: How the Supreme Court’s Trump v. Slaughter Transcript Reveals a Quietly Radical Plan for the Administrative State Read More
Constitutional Law / Federal Court / Judicial / Policy / Politics / Supreme Court

Trump v. Slaughter: The Supreme Court Case That Could Rewire Presidential Power — and America’s System of Administrative Justice Along With It

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The Supreme Court case Trump v. Slaughter threatens the independence of various regulatory agencies by potentially overturning the precedent set by Humphrey’s Executor. The outcome could grant presidents at-will removal authority over agency commissioners, reshape administrative courts, and diminish judicial oversight, leading to increased regulatory uncertainty and political influence over enforcement actions.

Trump v. Slaughter: The Supreme Court Case That Could Rewire Presidential Power — and America’s System of Administrative Justice Along With It Read More
Constitutional Law / Government / Government / Government Reform / Politics / Supreme Court / Supreme Court

The Great Constitutional Correction: How Courts Are Re-Drawing the Lines of Power

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Recent court cases across the U.S. are reshaping governmental authority, challenging the power dynamics between Congress, the President, and unelected agencies. The Rhode Island case signifies a judicial push to restore constitutional balance by questioning executive overreach and emergency powers. This movement aims to reestablish accountability within American governance structures.

The Great Constitutional Correction: How Courts Are Re-Drawing the Lines of Power Read More
Accountability / Adr / Alternative Dispute Resolution / Child Support / Child Support / Constitutional Law / Constitutional Rights / Corruption / Court Corruption / Family Court / Federal Funding / Government / Government Corruption / Legal History / Money and Finance / Supreme Court / Supreme Court / The Corruption Series / Washington, DC

The Fall of ADR: How the Supreme Court’s 2025 Rulings Exposed the Unconstitutional Rise of Shadow Justice

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

On July 14, 2025, the Supreme Court rulings in Trump v. J.G.G. and Kennedy v. Braidwood dismantled the legal framework of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), declaring only Article III courts can issue binding decisions. This has led to a crisis in state courts, exposing potentially void past rulings and requiring significant judicial reform.

The Fall of ADR: How the Supreme Court’s 2025 Rulings Exposed the Unconstitutional Rise of Shadow Justice Read More
Adr / Alternative Dispute Resolution / Constitutional Law / Constitutional Rights / Due Process Denied / Family Court / Family Court Reform / Judges / Locked Out of Justice / Supreme Court / Supreme Court / Voting / Voting Rights

The Quiet Coup: How ADR Replaced the Constitution and No One Voted for It

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

By Michael Phillips In a sharp and carefully phrased academic critique, Professor Eric Yamamoto confirms what many legal reformers have long suspected: the American justice system has been quietly hijacked. …

The Quiet Coup: How ADR Replaced the Constitution and No One Voted for It Read More
Adr / Alternative Dispute Resolution / Child Custody / Child Custody / Child Support / Child Support / Circuit Court / Civil Court / Court Corruption / Court Reform / Family Court / Family Court Reform / Government / Government / Government Corruption / Government Waste / Infrastructure / Politics

Courthouses Without Courts: How a $10 Billion Construction Boondoggle Laid the Bricks for ADR Tyranny

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The 1990s courthouse construction initiative, costing $10 billion, deviated from its intended purpose, evolving into a mismanaged project favoring bureaucratic control over judicial integrity. The oversight shifted decision-making away from judges to the Administrative Office, facilitating the rise of Alternative Dispute Resolution systems that undermine constitutional rights and transparency.

Courthouses Without Courts: How a $10 Billion Construction Boondoggle Laid the Bricks for ADR Tyranny Read More