Home » California Courts

The Criminalist and the Coerced Plea

Former criminalist Rhonda Reyna once testified for prosecutors in homicide cases. Years later, she says the same justice system ignored exculpatory evidence, pushed her into a no contest plea, and helped separate her from her daughter. Part one of Riptide’s investigation into California’s broken public defense system.

The Criminalist and the Coerced Plea Read More

Court Denies Brenna Gano’s Motions — But Sets the Stage for Trial

A San Mateo judge rejected attempts by Brenna Gano to overturn a 2022 settlement, citing statute of limitations concerns. Gano argued she was coerced into the agreement without proper accommodations for her disabilities. While the denials were procedural, a full-day trial is set for December 28, 2026, where core issues will be examined.

Court Denies Brenna Gano’s Motions — But Sets the Stage for Trial Read More

The Gatekeeper

Brenna Gano alleges that Samantha Esver-Poon, a Family Court Services counselor in San Mateo County, fabricated agreements and neglected evidence, leading to her estrangement from her son Jacob. Despite ongoing complaints, including violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act, Esver-Poon remains employed, and the county has yet to address the allegations.

The Gatekeeper Read More

The Mother the System Called the Problem

On Parental Alienation Awareness Day, Rhonda Reyna’s story exposes a disturbing inversion inside the family court system: the very label meant to protect children from manipulation is increasingly used against the parent raising legitimate safety concerns. As documented warnings go ignored and protective actions are reframed as “alienation,” the system meant to safeguard families instead becomes the mechanism separating them.

The Mother the System Called the Problem Read More

The Public Has a Right to Know Whether Government Agencies Followed the Law Before Taking Someone’s Freedom.

Los Angeles and San Diego officials are withholding public records related to the prosecution of Giselle Farias Smiel, raising concerns about transparency and due process. Despite legal obligations under the California Public Records Act, agencies have issued denials and delays, undermining public trust and accountability in the justice system.

The Public Has a Right to Know Whether Government Agencies Followed the Law Before Taking Someone’s Freedom. Read More

California’s Criminal Courts Are Using Protective Orders to Hide Evidence — and No One Is Stopping Them

California’s criminal courts are increasingly using protective orders to restrict defendants’ access to evidence, undermining due process. Overwhelmed public defenders are forced to accept these orders, harming defendants’ rights to prepare their defense. This systemic issue risks wrongful convictions and highlights a need for reform to restore transparency and accountability in the legal system.

California’s Criminal Courts Are Using Protective Orders to Hide Evidence — and No One Is Stopping Them Read More

Inside People v. Smiel: When Process Becomes the Story

Giselle Smiel faces five felonies, including kidnapping, for picking up her crying child at a San Diego school. Her defense argues there was no force or substantial movement, pointing to lack of evidence and jurisdictional issues. Advocates highlight constitutional violations and ADA neglect in her arrest, seeking dismissal of charges and oversight on family-court mechanisms in criminal cases.

Inside People v. Smiel: When Process Becomes the Story Read More

The Records They Wouldn’t Release — and the Mother They Jailed

The case of Giselle Smiel highlights significant issues of transparency and jurisdictional failures in California’s justice system. After a May 2025 incident involving alleged child abduction, Smiel faced six felony charges despite having no criminal history. Denied access to public records and effective legal representation, she remains in jail, raising concerns over systemic accountability and due process.

The Records They Wouldn’t Release — and the Mother They Jailed Read More

“Caught in the Lie—Again?” The Strange Redemption Arc of Sherri Papini and the Children Caught in the Crossfire

Sherri Papini, previously known for her faked abduction, is now embroiled in a custody battle for her children, facing skepticism about her intentions and mental health. As family court becomes a battleground for narratives over well-being, the focus shifts to the potential harm to her children amid systemic dysfunction and conflicting interests.

“Caught in the Lie—Again?” The Strange Redemption Arc of Sherri Papini and the Children Caught in the Crossfire Read More