Home » judicial overreach

Tag: judicial overreach
Anne Arundel County / bias / Child Custody / Child Custody / Child Protective Services / Child Support / Child Support / Corruption / Court Corruption / Family Court / Family Court Reform / Father's Rights / Maryland / Maryland Watch / Misconduct / parental rights / The Corruption Series / The Reichert Files / transparency

Maryland’s Parent-Erasure Pattern: Dangerous Crossroads in Custody Law

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The Reichert v. Hornbeck ruling in Anne Arundel County exemplifies a troubling trend in Maryland law, where de facto parentage may undermine fit biological parents’ rights. Judge Morris granted standing to John H. Michel without justification, risking judicial overreach. The General Assembly must intervene to protect fundamental parental rights and clarify legal standards.

Maryland’s Parent-Erasure Pattern: Dangerous Crossroads in Custody Law Read More
Accountability / Advocacy / Anne Arundel County / bias / Child Custody / Child Custody / Child Support / Child Support / Civil Rights / Corruption / Court Corruption / Due Process Denied / Family Court / Family Court Reform / Family Values / Father's Rights / Judges / Judicial / Judicial Disability / Maryland / Maryland Watch / Misconduct / parental rights / The Corruption Series / The Reichert Files

Maryland’s New Family Law Loophole: Erasing Parents Without Evidence

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

In Reichert v. Hornbeck, the Circuit Court has created a dangerous legal precedent by granting John H. Michel parental standing without any legal justification or consideration of the child’s wishes. This ruling threatens the rights of fit biological parents in Maryland, allowing judges to grant parental status to unrelated third parties arbitrarily.

Maryland’s New Family Law Loophole: Erasing Parents Without Evidence Read More
Accountability / Baltimore County / Carroll County / Eminent Domain / Energy / Frederick County / Infrastructure / Maryland / Maryland Land Wars (MPRP) / The New Land Wars / Washington County

Power Grab in the Piedmont: How Wes Moore Is Letting Out-of-State Interests Bulldoze Maryland Property Rights

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

By Michael Phillips As hundreds of Maryland families brace for the bulldozers of Public Service Enterprise Group (PSEG), one man has the power to stand up for their rights—and he’s …

Power Grab in the Piedmont: How Wes Moore Is Letting Out-of-State Interests Bulldoze Maryland Property Rights Read More
Adr / Alternative Dispute Resolution / Constitutional Law / Constitutional Rights / Due Process Denied / Family Court / Family Court Reform / Judges / Locked Out of Justice / Supreme Court / Supreme Court / Voting / Voting Rights

The Quiet Coup: How ADR Replaced the Constitution and No One Voted for It

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

By Michael Phillips In a sharp and carefully phrased academic critique, Professor Eric Yamamoto confirms what many legal reformers have long suspected: the American justice system has been quietly hijacked. …

The Quiet Coup: How ADR Replaced the Constitution and No One Voted for It Read More
Accountability / Corruption / Court Corruption / Crime & Violence / Crime Violence / Criminal / Family Court / Family Court Reform / Judges / The Corruption Series / Wisconsin

Judges Behind the Bench: Who’s Accountable in the Julie Valadez Case?

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Julie Valadez didn’t kidnap her son—he ran to her, fleeing what he described as an abusive home. Now she’s locked in a Wisconsin jail on $500,000 bail, while the judges responsible for years of questionable rulings face no consequences. This investigation names names, exposes judicial failures, and demands accountability in a system that punishes survivors instead of protecting them.

Judges Behind the Bench: Who’s Accountable in the Julie Valadez Case? Read More
Constitutional Law / Judges / Judicial / Judicial Disability / Laws / Opinion / Supreme Court / Supreme Court

Opinion: Barrett Draws the Line—And Raises Questions About Jackson’s Role on the Supreme Court

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

In a significant opinion, Justice Amy Coney Barrett criticized Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s dissent in Trump v. CASA, Inc., highlighting the dangers of judicial overreach and the role of courts. She emphasized that judges must interpret the law, not legislate, marking a crucial boundary for future judicial conduct.

Opinion: Barrett Draws the Line—And Raises Questions About Jackson’s Role on the Supreme Court Read More
Government / Government / Judges / Judicial / Maryland / Politics

Trump Administration Strikes Back: Lawsuit Targets Entire Maryland Federal Bench Over Deportation Delay

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The Trump administration has filed a lawsuit against Maryland’s federal judges, accusing them of judicial overreach for delaying deportation proceedings. The move aims to assert executive authority over immigration enforcement and deter other courts from similar actions. Critics argue this could lead to ideological interference in immigration policy.

Trump Administration Strikes Back: Lawsuit Targets Entire Maryland Federal Bench Over Deportation Delay Read More
Court Corruption / Judges / Judicial Disability / The Corruption Series / Thunder's Wall of Shame / Virginia / Virginia Watch

Behind the Gavel: Scrutinizing Judge Penney Azcarate Beyond the Headlines

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Judge Penney Azcarate gained fame during the Depp-Heard trial but faces criticism for her family court practices in Virginia. Critics claim her decisions may hinder victims seeking justice, citing concerns over judicial conduct that balance her praised veterans’ advocacy against allegations of courtroom mismanagement and bias. Ongoing scrutiny suggests a complex legacy.

Behind the Gavel: Scrutinizing Judge Penney Azcarate Beyond the Headlines Read More
Child Custody / Child Protective Services / Court Corruption / Family Court Reform / New Mexico

Child Taken, Then Lost Forever: Did Judicial Overreach in New Mexico Lead to Baby Skylar’s Death?

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The tragic case of ten-month-old Skylar’s death in New Mexico raises alarms about the power of family courts and child welfare systems. Removed from her mother due to unproven concerns, Skylar died in state custody, highlighting flaws in a system prioritizing risk management over family preservation. Calls for reform echo throughout the narrative.

Child Taken, Then Lost Forever: Did Judicial Overreach in New Mexico Lead to Baby Skylar’s Death? Read More
Immagration / Judicial

Maryland Court’s Habeas Order: Shielding Illegal Immigrants or Undermining Immigration Enforcement?

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The U.S. District Court for Maryland has implemented a 48-hour halt on deportations upon filing a habeas corpus petition for undocumented immigrants, allowing legal challenges to detention. This unprecedented measure raises concerns about potential exploitation but also acts as a check on executive immigration enforcement, particularly against the Trump administration’s policies.

Maryland Court’s Habeas Order: Shielding Illegal Immigrants or Undermining Immigration Enforcement? Read More