Home » Title II ADA

Tag: Title II ADA
3 - Investigations / 4 - Cases / Ada Accommodations / Beyond Barriers and Disability Rights / Brenna Gano Case / California / California Watch / Child Custody / Child Custody / Disability / Disability Rights / Disability Rights / Family Court / Family Court Reform / The California Custody Cartel

The Judge Who Wasn’t Ready

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Judge Vivian Wang, recently appointed with no family law experience, denied motions in a complex custody case involving alleged fraud and disability accommodations. Critics argue her procedural ruling lacked thorough legal analysis, particularly regarding limitations and equitable tolling. The upcoming trial may test her judicial capabilities and the fairness of the process.

The Judge Who Wasn’t Ready Read More
4 - Cases / Ada Accommodations / Beyond Barriers and Disability Rights / Court Corruption / Disability / Disability Rights / Disability Rights / Family Court / Family Court Reform / Federal Court / Institutions / Legal Reform / Maryland / Maryland Watch / The Reichert Files

Two Courts, Two Answers: How a Federal Accommodation Order Exposed the Anne Arundel Circuit Court’s ADA Defiance

- by Michael Phillips - 1 Comment

In January 2026, a federal magistrate granted Jeffrey Reichert remote ADA accommodations for pretrial hearings, while the Anne Arundel County Circuit Court repeatedly denied his requests, even barring him from future filings. This stark contrast raises questions about court compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and retaliation against disabled litigants.

Two Courts, Two Answers: How a Federal Accommodation Order Exposed the Anne Arundel Circuit Court’s ADA Defiance Read More
3 - Investigations / 4 - Cases / Accountability / Ada Accommodations / Brenna Gano Case / California / California Watch / Child Custody / Child Custody / Court Corruption / Disability / Disability Rights / Disability Rights / Family Court / Family Court Reform / Government / Government Accountability / Institutions / Institutions & Accountability / parental rights / Parental Rights / The California Custody Cartel

The Gatekeeper

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Brenna Gano alleges that Samantha Esver-Poon, a Family Court Services counselor in San Mateo County, fabricated agreements and neglected evidence, leading to her estrangement from her son Jacob. Despite ongoing complaints, including violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act, Esver-Poon remains employed, and the county has yet to address the allegations.

The Gatekeeper Read More
2 - Analysis / 3 - Investigations / Circuit Court / Civil Court / Civil Rights / Civil Rights / Court Corruption / Court Reform / Domestic Policy / Family Court / Family Court Reform / Government / Institutions / Institutions & Accountability / Justice & Governance / Maryland / Maryland Watch

No One Is Watching: How Montgomery County’s Family Court Operates Without External Oversight, and What Happens to the People Who Notice

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

An investigation reveals a significant accountability gap in Maryland’s family court system, where civil rights complaints against judges lack external oversight and transparency. Complaints filed are often sealed and unreported, leading to systemic noncompliance without recourse for litigants. This raises critical issues about judicial accountability and the structures that enable potential misconduct.

No One Is Watching: How Montgomery County’s Family Court Operates Without External Oversight, and What Happens to the People Who Notice Read More
3 - Investigations / 4 - Cases / Anne Arundel County / Appellate Court / Baltimore City / Baltimore County / Civil Rights / Court Corruption / Court Reform / Domestic Violence / Family Court / Family Court Reform / Legal Reform / Maryland / Maryland Watch / Protective Orders / The Reichert Files / The Shadow Docket of Reichert v. Hornbeck

The Standard Nobody Published: Maryland’s Amended Protective Order Law, Eight Years Without a Reported Case

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

A Maryland custody case once made law. Then, over six years and five more appeals, Reichert v. Hornbeck generated a body of unreported family-law rulings that resolved recurring questions but never entered the state’s published precedent. This article examines what that means for litigants, lawyers, and the public.
Grounded in the article’s opening and its explanation of the five unreported opinions and their impact.

The Standard Nobody Published: Maryland’s Amended Protective Order Law, Eight Years Without a Reported Case Read More
Civil Rights / Civil Rights / Court Reform / Disability / Disability Rights / Disability Rights / Discrimination / Family Court / Family Court Reform / Federal Court / Parental Rights / parental rights / Rights and Freedoms / The Reichert Files

Disabled Father’s Explosive ADA Lawsuit Slams Maryland Court for Systemic Discrimination—Will AG Brown Defend the Indefensible?

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Disabled veteran Jeff Reichert’s federal lawsuit against the Anne Arundel County Circuit Court reveals alleged systematic discrimination and retaliation in his custody battle. Despite his disabilities, the court denied reasonable accommodations required under the ADA, raising significant concerns about bias and access to justice within Maryland’s family court system.

Disabled Father’s Explosive ADA Lawsuit Slams Maryland Court for Systemic Discrimination—Will AG Brown Defend the Indefensible? Read More
3 - Investigations / Ada Accommodations / Beyond Barriers and Disability Rights / California / California Watch / Child Custody / Child Protective Services / Child Support / Child Trafficking / Child Welfare / Corruption / Court Corruption / Disability / Disability Rights / Disability Rights / Domestic Violence / Family Court / Government / Government Corruption / Law and Order / Parental Rights / parental rights / San Marcos Abduction Attempt / The Corruption Series / The Smiel Series / transparency

Paper Crime Scene: How a County Line Turned a Custody Dispute Into a Felony Case

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Giselle Farias Smiel faces felony charges for allegedly kidnapping her children, stemming from bureaucratic mistakes and insufficient evidence. The case highlights systemic failures, including secrecy and lack of inter-agency communication, which overshadow due process and create a troubling precedent for parental rights and disability protections within the legal system.

Paper Crime Scene: How a County Line Turned a Custody Dispute Into a Felony Case Read More
Accountability / Ada Accommodations / Beyond Barriers and Disability Rights / Disability / Disability Rights / Disability Rights / Education / Education / Education Reform / Government / Law and Order / Laws / Oklahoma / State Lawmakers

The Ramp, Not the Ribbon-Cutting: How an Edmond Playground Exposed a Civil Rights Problem in Plain Sight

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Parents and educators at Will Rogers Elementary in Edmond, Oklahoma, are advocating for true ADA compliance in playground design, highlighting that recent installations fail to provide equal access for children with disabilities. The case reflects broader systemic issues of compliance neglect and retaliation against advocates, exposing a culture prioritizing image over inclusivity.

The Ramp, Not the Ribbon-Cutting: How an Edmond Playground Exposed a Civil Rights Problem in Plain Sight Read More
Accountability / Ada Accommodations / Beyond Barriers and Disability Rights / California / California Watch / Child Custody / Civil Rights / Civil Rights / Corruption / Court Corruption / Court Reform / Crime & Violence / Criminal / Disability / Disability Rights / Disability Rights / Discrimination / Domestic Violence / Due Process Denied / Family Court / Family Court Reform / Government Corruption / Legal Reform / Parental Rights / parental rights / Rights and Freedoms / San Marcos Abduction Attempt / The Corruption Series / The Smiel Series / transparency

The Records They Wouldn’t Release — and the Mother They Jailed

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The case of Giselle Smiel highlights significant issues of transparency and jurisdictional failures in California’s justice system. After a May 2025 incident involving alleged child abduction, Smiel faced six felony charges despite having no criminal history. Denied access to public records and effective legal representation, she remains in jail, raising concerns over systemic accountability and due process.

The Records They Wouldn’t Release — and the Mother They Jailed Read More
Ada Accommodations / Beyond Barriers and Disability Rights / Civil Rights / Civil Rights / Disability / Disability Rights / Disability Rights / Discrimination / Family Court / Laws / Mental Health / Rights and Freedoms

The ADA in State Courts: A Promise Betrayed for Americans with Invisible Disabilities

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The Americans with Disabilities Act aimed to ensure accessibility for all, yet invisible disabilities remain largely unrecognized in courts, with inadequate staff training and compliance. This neglect leads to severe injustices, reflecting systemic bias. Court reforms are necessary, including appointing ADA coordinators, enforcing accountability, and enhancing digital accessibility, to uphold true justice.

The ADA in State Courts: A Promise Betrayed for Americans with Invisible Disabilities Read More