Home » access to justice

No One Is Watching: How Montgomery County’s Family Court Operates Without External Oversight, and What Happens to the People Who Notice

An investigation reveals a significant accountability gap in Maryland’s family court system, where civil rights complaints against judges lack external oversight and transparency. Complaints filed are often sealed and unreported, leading to systemic noncompliance without recourse for litigants. This raises critical issues about judicial accountability and the structures that enable potential misconduct.

No One Is Watching: How Montgomery County’s Family Court Operates Without External Oversight, and What Happens to the People Who Notice Read More

Disability Advocates Condemn New York Court of Appeals and Judge Anthony Cannataro for Denying Disabled Father Access to Justice

The New York Court of Appeals dismissed Marc Fishman’s appeal regarding ADA violations during his seven-year litigation, claiming it lacked jurisdiction. Despite a federal judge’s order for accommodations, Westchester courts denied necessary support, highlighting systemic issues in New York’s justice system that prevent disabled litigants from obtaining fair treatment and redress. Advocates call for legislative reforms.

Disability Advocates Condemn New York Court of Appeals and Judge Anthony Cannataro for Denying Disabled Father Access to Justice Read More

The Transcript Trap: How South Carolina Appeals Shut Parents Out of Justice

William Sewell’s appeal following Judge Mandy Kimmons’ ruling confronts a major obstacle: the trial transcript. Sewell argues that opposing counsel Donald Gamache must share the transcript based on legal precedent, while Gamache insists Sewell must pay for it. This financial barrier effectively obstructs due process and limits parents’ ability to contest unjust rulings.

The Transcript Trap: How South Carolina Appeals Shut Parents Out of Justice Read More

The Discovery Trap: How Legal Gamesmanship Bled a Father Dry in Family Court

William Sewell, representing himself in a South Carolina custody battle, encountered systemic deception and financial devastation in family court. Despite his compliance, he faced manipulation through a flawed discovery process, resulting in significant expenses and lack of proper documentation. His experience illustrates a larger issue where self-represented litigants are exploited within the legal system.

The Discovery Trap: How Legal Gamesmanship Bled a Father Dry in Family Court Read More

Justice Denied: The Impeachment Files (Part 2)

The American Inns of Court (AIC) operates as a private, powerful guild influencing the U.S. judiciary without public oversight or accountability. This secretive organization fosters bias and creates a legal caste system. Recent impeachment calls against Chief Justice Roberts have spotlighted these issues, raising concerns about fairness and transparency in the justice system.

Justice Denied: The Impeachment Files (Part 2) Read More

Justice Denied: The Impeachment Files

Janice Wolk Grenadier is challenging Chief Justice John G. Roberts over the upcoming private gala at the Supreme Court, which she argues symbolizes elitism in the judiciary. She filed a Petition for Impeachment citing constitutional violations and calling for Congress to act against the growing disconnect between the legal elite and ordinary citizens.

Justice Denied: The Impeachment Files Read More

The ADA Black Hole: How Judges Pretend Disability Rights Don’t Exist in America’s Courtrooms

The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) is often disregarded in U.S. courts, resulting in severe consequences for disabled litigants like Marc Fishman and Taran Nolan. Courts frequently deny or ignore ADA accommodations, causing emotional and legal chaos. This systemic issue necessitates enforcement, training, and accountability for judges to ensure equal justice.

The ADA Black Hole: How Judges Pretend Disability Rights Don’t Exist in America’s Courtrooms Read More

Disrespected and Denied: How the Legal System Treats Pro Se Litigants Like Second-Class Citizens—and Why We Must Speak Out

Pro se litigants face systemic bias and mistreatment in court, often disregarded by judges and attorneys. Despite constitutional rights, they are frequently denied due process and subjected to disrespect. The article emphasizes the need for accountability in the legal system, urging individuals to speak out against judicial misconduct to reclaim justice.

Disrespected and Denied: How the Legal System Treats Pro Se Litigants Like Second-Class Citizens—and Why We Must Speak Out Read More

The Players: The Judges, Attorneys, and Guardians Who Keep the System Running

William Sewell’s custody battle highlights systemic issues in family court, revealing conflicts of interest among judges, attorneys, and guardians that undermine due process. Despite serious concerns for his daughter’s safety, Sewell faces barriers from a protective legal network surrounding his ex-wife, Leslie, and her attorney, Donnie Gamache, compromising justice.

The Players: The Judges, Attorneys, and Guardians Who Keep the System Running Read More

Blocked at the Clerk’s Window: When Legal Assistance Becomes Legal Obstruction for Pro Se Parents Like William Sewell

William Sewell, a pro se litigant in South Carolina, faces systemic legal obstruction at the Dorchester County Family Court. The clerk denies him access to file motions without providing clear guidance, exacerbating his financial struggles. This highlights a broader issue of favoritism and lack of support for self-represented individuals in the justice system.

Blocked at the Clerk’s Window: When Legal Assistance Becomes Legal Obstruction for Pro Se Parents Like William Sewell Read More