Home » Investigative Journalism

The Criminalist and the Coerced Plea

Former criminalist Rhonda Reyna once testified for prosecutors in homicide cases. Years later, she says the same justice system ignored exculpatory evidence, pushed her into a no contest plea, and helped separate her from her daughter. Part one of Riptide’s investigation into California’s broken public defense system.

The Criminalist and the Coerced Plea Read More

The Gatekeeper

Brenna Gano alleges that Samantha Esver-Poon, a Family Court Services counselor in San Mateo County, fabricated agreements and neglected evidence, leading to her estrangement from her son Jacob. Despite ongoing complaints, including violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act, Esver-Poon remains employed, and the county has yet to address the allegations.

The Gatekeeper Read More

The Mother the System Called the Problem

On Parental Alienation Awareness Day, Rhonda Reyna’s story exposes a disturbing inversion inside the family court system: the very label meant to protect children from manipulation is increasingly used against the parent raising legitimate safety concerns. As documented warnings go ignored and protective actions are reframed as “alienation,” the system meant to safeguard families instead becomes the mechanism separating them.

The Mother the System Called the Problem Read More

The Ambush

Brenna Gano’s tumultuous experience in San Mateo County family court culminated in a misleading Zoom mediation on February 15, 2022, where she faced undue pressure to sign a Memorandum of Agreement regarding custody and finances. This occurred amid a financial disparity and lack of proper legal representation, leading to claims of duress and calls for the agreement to be set aside.

The Ambush Read More

When Police Kill Disabled Americans, No One Has to Count It

Disabled Americans are killed by police at disproportionately high rates — but no official system tracks it. The data exists only through journalists and advocates, exposing a national accountability gap hiding in plain sight.

When Police Kill Disabled Americans, No One Has to Count It Read More

Inside the California Custody Cartel

Brenna Gano’s experience in California’s family court highlights a troubling system where justice is influenced by financial interests. Misled and pressured into signing agreements, she faced excessive costs and neurological biases that labeled her as unstable. Her case exemplifies a broader pattern of exploitation for profit within family court practices, jeopardizing families’ well-being.

Inside the California Custody Cartel Read More

Follow the money: how $1 billion in federal bonuses built an incentive to separate families

Since 1997, the federal government has paid states over $1 billion in adoption incentives, encouraging adoptions instead of family reunification. While foster care numbers declined, adoption assistance payments surged by nearly 43% in recent years, highlighting a troubling financial structure favoring permanent separations over reunifications.

Follow the money: how $1 billion in federal bonuses built an incentive to separate families Read More

The Officer’s Mind

When police officers fire their weapons, the moment often lasts only seconds. But inside the officer’s mind, the experience can be shaped by adrenaline, tunnel vision, and extreme stress responses that alter perception. Understanding these psychological effects is critical to understanding controversial police shootings.

The Officer’s Mind Read More

Chaos, Seconds, and a Fatal Shot

On a chaotic night at the Virginia Beach Oceanfront in March 2021, three shootings erupted within minutes. Amid sirens, crowds fleeing, and police rushing toward gunfire, Officer Solomon Simmons encountered 25-year-old Donovon Lynch — an innocent bystander walking back to his car. Seconds later Lynch was dead. Five years later, critical questions remain about what really happened in those final moments.

Chaos, Seconds, and a Fatal Shot Read More

The Reichert Files: What the Defendant Admitted Under Oath

A February 2026 deposition in the federal case against Jeffrey Reichert revealed significant details about his contentious custody battle with Sarah Hornbeck. Hornbeck admitted her past DUI arrest and expressed memory gaps regarding critical events, raising questions about the reliability of her prior legal filings. The deposition highlights the complexities and ongoing nature of their legal conflict.

The Reichert Files: What the Defendant Admitted Under Oath Read More