Home » Judicial

Judicial
2 - Analysis / 3 - Investigations / Dead Reckoning / Energy / Energy / Environment / Environmental Justice / Government / Judicial / Lawfare & Intelligence / Laws / Supreme Court / Supreme Court

A Brooding Federal Interest

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The Supreme Court will hear Suncor Energy v. Boulder County, a significant climate case affecting fossil fuel companies. The Court must determine if federal law prevents Boulder from pursuing state tort claims against these firms for climate-related damages. The case touches upon critical issues of state versus federal authority and potential implications for similar lawsuits nationwide.

A Brooding Federal Interest Read More
Domestic Policy / Federal Court / Government / Government / Intelligence & National Security / Judicial / Justice & Governance / National Security / Retrospective

No Verdict: Twenty-Five Years On, the 9/11 “Trial of the Century” Still Hasn’t Started

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, identified as the 9/11 attacks’ mastermind, was captured in 2003 but remains in pretrial proceedings at Guantanamo Bay, now targeting a trial date of June 2028. The case has faced numerous delays and legal complications, including issues stemming from previous torture during CIA custody, significantly complicating prosecution.

No Verdict: Twenty-Five Years On, the 9/11 “Trial of the Century” Still Hasn’t Started Read More
2 - Analysis / Constitutional Law / Constitutional Rights / Dead Reckoning / Judicial / Politics / Politics / Supreme Court / Supreme Court

The Court Keeps Choosing the Same Referee

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The Supreme Court’s recent rulings reflect a trend of deference to political branches over judicial scrutiny. In cases involving federal agency independence and transgender athletes in sports, the Court prioritized legislative judgment over judicial fact-finding. This selective application of judicial restraint raises concerns about consistency in adjudicating contested factual questions across different contexts.

The Court Keeps Choosing the Same Referee Read More
2 - Analysis / Constitutional Law / Dead Reckoning / Judicial / Lawfare & Intelligence / Laws / Politics / Politics / Politics & Power / Supreme Court / Supreme Court

They Built the Cage, Then Complained When Someone Else Got the Key

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The Supreme Court’s recent ruling allows Donald Trump to dismiss independent agency commissioners at will, overturning a 90-year precedent. This shift exposes the political nature of such agencies, historically insulated to advance particular agendas. The decision reinforces presidential accountability, increasing the political stakes in agency actions and prioritizing electoral responsibility.

They Built the Cage, Then Complained When Someone Else Got the Key Read More
3 - Investigations / Crime & Violence / Crime Violence / Criminal / Five Years Later: The Donovon Lynch Shooting / Government / Judicial / Law and Order / Law Enforcement / Lawfare & Intelligence / Virginia / Virginia Watch

Seconds in the Dark: Reconstructing the Exact Moments of the Donovon Lynch Shooting

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

In the seconds before Donovon Lynch was shot, no camera captured what happened—but the available evidence tells a stark story: an officer approaching from behind, no confirmed identification, and no physical proof that Lynch ever pointed a weapon.

Seconds in the Dark: Reconstructing the Exact Moments of the Donovon Lynch Shooting Read More
Family Court / Federal Court / Judicial / Maryland / Maryland Watch / The Reichert Files

The Reichert Files: What the Defendant Admitted Under Oath

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

A February 2026 deposition in the federal case against Jeffrey Reichert revealed significant details about his contentious custody battle with Sarah Hornbeck. Hornbeck admitted her past DUI arrest and expressed memory gaps regarding critical events, raising questions about the reliability of her prior legal filings. The deposition highlights the complexities and ongoing nature of their legal conflict.

The Reichert Files: What the Defendant Admitted Under Oath Read More
Five Years Later: The Donovon Lynch Shooting / Government / Judicial / Law and Order / Law Enforcement / Lawfare & Intelligence / Laws / Virginia / Virginia Watch

Five Years Later: Review Board Deadlock In Virginia Beach Reignites Debate Over Donovon Lynch Shooting

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Five years after Donovon Lynch was fatally shot at the Virginia Beach Oceanfront, the city’s Independent Citizen Review Board has failed to reach consensus — issuing no findings and no recommendations. While the Special Grand Jury declined to charge the officer involved and attorney Jeff Reichert was later cleared of a perjury investigation, the review board’s deadlock has reignited debate over accountability, oversight, and whether the case is truly settled in the eyes of the community.

Five Years Later: Review Board Deadlock In Virginia Beach Reignites Debate Over Donovon Lynch Shooting Read More
Judicial / Laws / Supreme Court / Supreme Court

Scalia’s Shadow: The Originalist Who Still Shapes the Supreme Court

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Justice Antonin Scalia’s legacy significantly impacts modern constitutional law, particularly through his originalist philosophy that shapes Supreme Court rulings today. His dissent in Planned Parenthood v. Casey laid the groundwork for recent decisions like Dobbs v. Jackson. Scalia’s approach highlights democracy and the Constitution’s text, influencing today’s judicial framework.

Scalia’s Shadow: The Originalist Who Still Shapes the Supreme Court Read More
Government / Judicial / Laws / Politics / Politics / Politics & Power / Power

Supreme Court Slams the Brakes on Executive Tariffs — But the Left Won’t Like What Comes Next

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the Trump administration overstepped its authority by imposing broad tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. This decision does not eliminate tariffs or presidential trade powers but requires congressional approval for significant trade policies, refocusing the debate on legislative accountability and structural limits on executive power.

Supreme Court Slams the Brakes on Executive Tariffs — But the Left Won’t Like What Comes Next Read More
Judicial / Media / Media & Influence / News & Media / Opinion / Voice

When a Justice Joins the Applause: Why the Grammys Were the Wrong Place for Judicial Neutrality

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The controversy over Ketanji Brown Jackson’s attendance at the Grammys centers on her participation in an “ICE OUT” moment, raising concerns about judicial neutrality. Critics argue that her applause risks undermining public confidence in the Supreme Court’s impartiality, blurring lines between law and activism, and damaging the Court’s legitimacy in a polarized culture.

When a Justice Joins the Applause: Why the Grammys Were the Wrong Place for Judicial Neutrality Read More