Investigative Journalism | Exposing What Lies Beneath
A father who once had primary custody now finds himself locked out—not just of his child’s life, but of the courtroom itself. As proceedings move forward without his participation, filings raise urgent questions about jurisdiction, due process, and whether access to justice in Maryland depends on who the system allows through the door.
Maryland’s judiciary operates with little accountability due to unopposed elections and a complex appointment process. Many judges remain indifferent to the needs of families, victims, and citizens across various court types. Voter awareness and activism can challenge this complacency, pushing for transparency and accountability in judicial appointments and elections to ensure judges serve the public effectively.
Judges Aren’t Invincible: How Maryland Voters Can Keep the Bench Accountable Read More
Montgomery County, Maryland faces allegations of bias and misconduct within its family court, primarily involving Judge Bibi Berry. Fathers describe a hostile environment where due process is lacking, and their voices are ignored. Calls for oversight and possible impeachment of Berry are increasing as the judicial culture is seen as damaging to families and children.
Judicial Injustice in Suburbia: How Judge Bibi Berry and Montgomery County Family Court Became Every Father’s Worst Nightmare Read More
In Montgomery County, Maryland, a father has been unable to see his son since January 2024 due to the Circuit Court’s refusal to enforce a court order. Despite filing around 100 motions requesting enforcement and accommodations for disabilities, all efforts were ignored or denied, reflecting systemic neglect of fathers’ rights within the family court system.
Every Motion Denied: A Father’s Day Message from the Broken Heart of Maryland Family Court Read More