Home » Legal Corruption

Inside People v. Smiel: When Process Becomes the Story

Giselle Smiel faces five felonies, including kidnapping, for picking up her crying child at a San Diego school. Her defense argues there was no force or substantial movement, pointing to lack of evidence and jurisdictional issues. Advocates highlight constitutional violations and ADA neglect in her arrest, seeking dismissal of charges and oversight on family-court mechanisms in criminal cases.

Inside People v. Smiel: When Process Becomes the Story Read More

The South Carolina Family Court Trap: How Judges Use Rule Games to Dodge Accountability

On September 3, 2025, Judge Mandy Kimmons denied crucial motions filed by William Sewell in his divorce case, effectively stripping him of due process rights. This case exemplifies how South Carolina family courts manipulate procedures to protect judges at the expense of litigants, highlighting the urgent need for reform to ensure accountability and justice.

The South Carolina Family Court Trap: How Judges Use Rule Games to Dodge Accountability Read More

No Order, No Appeal: The Quiet Corruption of Judge-Shopping in Westchester Family Court

Marc Fishman, a disabled father, seeks a signed transfer order for his family court case after it was reassigned from Judge Burke to Judge Michelle Schauer without documentation. Despite multiple requests, the court has not provided clarity, raising concerns about judicial misconduct, ADA violations, and lack of due process for pro se litigants.

No Order, No Appeal: The Quiet Corruption of Judge-Shopping in Westchester Family Court Read More

The Players: The Judges, Attorneys, and Guardians Who Keep the System Running

William Sewell’s custody battle highlights systemic issues in family court, revealing conflicts of interest among judges, attorneys, and guardians that undermine due process. Despite serious concerns for his daughter’s safety, Sewell faces barriers from a protective legal network surrounding his ex-wife, Leslie, and her attorney, Donnie Gamache, compromising justice.

The Players: The Judges, Attorneys, and Guardians Who Keep the System Running Read More

Back in the Game: Why New Jersey’s Decision to Reinstate Disbarred Lawyers Should Outrage Every American

The New Jersey Supreme Court’s recent ruling allows disbarred lawyers, including those convicted of theft and fraud, to seek reinstatement after five years. This decision underscores a justice system that favors professionals while punishing ordinary citizens for minor errors. Advocates call for accountability and transparency in legal reinstatements.

Back in the Game: Why New Jersey’s Decision to Reinstate Disbarred Lawyers Should Outrage Every American Read More