Home » Maryland Courts

The Wrong County

A Maryland custody case involving Sarah Hornbeck and Jeffrey Reichert experienced prolonged legal battles due to a contentious address issue. Hornbeck’s initial emergency petition, filed under an incorrect Anne Arundel County address, led to years of hearings and appeals. Despite numerous jurisdiction challenges, the court upheld jurisdiction without addressing the misrepresentation of Hornbeck’s residence.

The Wrong County Read More

The 90-Day Order: How an Unprecedented Custody Decision Became Invisible Law

In February 2022, Judge Alison L. Asti ordered Jeffrey Reichert to have no contact with his son, G.R., for ninety days, disrupting their long-established custody. The unreported appellate opinion overlooked crucial case history, raising concerns about judicial consistency and transparency in contested custody cases involving allegations of parental alienation.

The 90-Day Order: How an Unprecedented Custody Decision Became Invisible Law Read More

The Standard Nobody Published: Maryland’s Amended Protective Order Law, Eight Years Without a Reported Case

A Maryland custody case once made law. Then, over six years and five more appeals, Reichert v. Hornbeck generated a body of unreported family-law rulings that resolved recurring questions but never entered the state’s published precedent. This article examines what that means for litigants, lawyers, and the public.
Grounded in the article’s opening and its explanation of the five unreported opinions and their impact.

The Standard Nobody Published: Maryland’s Amended Protective Order Law, Eight Years Without a Reported Case Read More

Five Appeals, No Precedent: How One of Maryland’s Most Litigated Custody Cases Disappeared Into the Shadows

In 2013, the Maryland custody case Reichert v. Hornbeck set legal precedents but generated five unreported opinions that became invisible in family law discussions. These opinions addressed crucial issues like protective orders and child support yet lacked publication, highlighting systemic transparency problems in Maryland’s family law, affecting future cases significantly.

Five Appeals, No Precedent: How One of Maryland’s Most Litigated Custody Cases Disappeared Into the Shadows Read More

Disabled Father’s Explosive ADA Lawsuit Slams Maryland Court for Systemic Discrimination—Will AG Brown Defend the Indefensible?

Disabled veteran Jeff Reichert’s federal lawsuit against the Anne Arundel County Circuit Court reveals alleged systematic discrimination and retaliation in his custody battle. Despite his disabilities, the court denied reasonable accommodations required under the ADA, raising significant concerns about bias and access to justice within Maryland’s family court system.

Disabled Father’s Explosive ADA Lawsuit Slams Maryland Court for Systemic Discrimination—Will AG Brown Defend the Indefensible? Read More

Hornbeck’s Panic Play: Motion to Dismiss Filed Days After Deposition Raised Questions About Basis for Criminal Charges

Sarah Hornbeck has filed a Motion to Dismiss in the federal case Reichert v. Hornbeck after a deposition where she faltered under questioning regarding the evidence for her criminal charges against ex-husband Jeff Reichert. Critics claim her motion is a desperate attempt to avoid accountability in a long custody battle that alienated Reichert from their son.

Hornbeck’s Panic Play: Motion to Dismiss Filed Days After Deposition Raised Questions About Basis for Criminal Charges Read More

Justice Cannot Be Blind to Invisible Disabilities

Maryland courts are increasingly denying ADA accommodation requests for individuals with invisible disabilities, leading to severe consequences. Judges are making medical determinations without proper evaluations, overshadowing federal law. This systemic failure calls for reforms including empowered ADA coordinators, necessary written responses, independent oversight, and better judicial training to honor ADA rights effectively.

Justice Cannot Be Blind to Invisible Disabilities Read More

The Disabilities You Don’t See — and the Systems That Still Don’t See Us

The article addresses the plight of individuals with invisible disabilities in America, highlighting systemic bias in courts and workplaces. Despite the ADA’s provisions, many face barriers due to outdated perceptions and bureaucratic inefficiencies, resulting in detrimental outcomes. Advocates emphasize the need for better enforcement and understanding of these disabilities.

The Disabilities You Don’t See — and the Systems That Still Don’t See Us Read More

So You Want to Be a Maryland Magistrate? A Step-by-Step Guide to Letting Criminals Run Free

The content critiques the ease of becoming a magistrate in Maryland without a law degree or passing the bar exam. It highlights the absurdity of allowing unqualified individuals to make critical legal decisions, emphasizing the potential dangers of this system, where accountability is negligible and public safety is compromised.

So You Want to Be a Maryland Magistrate? A Step-by-Step Guide to Letting Criminals Run Free Read More

Maryland’s “No-Law-Degree-Required” Magistrates: Because Why Should Justice Require Actual Lawyers?

In Maryland, individuals without law degrees or bar licenses can become magistrates, thus wielding significant judicial power. This alarming practice allows untrained people to make critical decisions regarding violent offenders, compromising public safety. Such a system raises serious concerns about the qualifications required for roles that impact lives and communities.

Maryland’s “No-Law-Degree-Required” Magistrates: Because Why Should Justice Require Actual Lawyers? Read More