Tag: court transparency
Ada Accommodations / Anne Arundel County / Appellate Court / Baltimore City / Constitutional Law / Disability / Judges

A Voice for Justice: How Jeff Reichert Turned to an ADA Advocate to Defend His Rights and Protect His Son

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Jeff Reichert has engaged an independent ADA advocate, Janice Wolk Grenadier, to address alleged discrimination and procedural failures in his custody battle. Her letter calls for judicial accountability, an investigation into jurisdictional misconduct, enforcement of past court orders, and safeguarding the rights of both Grant and Jeff during a flawed legal process.

A Voice for Justice: How Jeff Reichert Turned to an ADA Advocate to Defend His Rights and Protect His Son Read More
Adr / Constitutional Law / Court Reform / Family Court

Judges with a Financial Stake in Your Case? Why That’s a Constitutional Crisis

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The family court system faces significant issues regarding judicial impartiality, as many judges have financial ties that create conflicts of interest. Despite the Supreme Court’s ruling in Caperton v. A.T. Massey, recusal is rarely practiced, leading to a constitutional crisis where litigants, particularly vulnerable ones, are deprived of fair hearings.

Judges with a Financial Stake in Your Case? Why That’s a Constitutional Crisis Read More
Adr / Family Court / Judges / New York / The Fishman Files / Uncategorized

When Judges Judge Their Own Cases: Why Recusal Rules Fail in Family Court

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

In America’s family courts, the principle that no one should be a judge in their own case is often violated. The case of Marc Fishman highlights this issue, as Judge Michelle I. Schauer, with a contentious history with Fishman, asserts control over his custody case despite allegations of bias and ethical concerns, undermining judicial impartiality.

When Judges Judge Their Own Cases: Why Recusal Rules Fail in Family Court Read More
Family Court / Judicial

Justice for Sale: How Socioeconomic Bias Is Wrecking Families in Family Court

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Family court often prioritizes wealth over justice, creating socioeconomic bias against those who cannot afford legal representation or services. This leads to systemic disadvantages for low-income litigants, impacting their ability to advocate for their children’s best interests. Strategies exist for pro se litigants to combat these inequalities and seek fair treatment.

Justice for Sale: How Socioeconomic Bias Is Wrecking Families in Family Court Read More
bias / Family Court / Judicial / Misconduct / Uncategorized

⚖️ Justice for Sale: How Socioeconomic Bias Is Wrecking Families in Family Court

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Family court often exhibits socioeconomic bias, favoring wealthier litigants and undermining those without financial resources. This bias can lead to dire consequences for lower-income parents, affecting their ability to secure fair hearings and maintain relationships with their children. Advocating for equal treatment and reform in the judiciary is crucial for justice.

⚖️ Justice for Sale: How Socioeconomic Bias Is Wrecking Families in Family Court Read More
Judicial / Overreach

Family Court: The Administrative State That’s Destroying Families

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

America’s family courts have shifted from judicial proceedings to administrative enforcement, compromising due process and parental rights over the last thirty years. Critics highlight the system’s financial incentives and lack of transparency. Despite signs of resistance, meaningful reform faces challenges as families continue to suffer under obscure processes lacking true justice safeguards.

Family Court: The Administrative State That’s Destroying Families Read More
Congress / Government / Government Waste / Judicial

The $10 Billion Courtroom Con: How “ADR Reform” Built an Administrative Empire

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

In 1990, the Judicial Improvements Act aimed to streamline justice through Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), but resulted in an unprecedented expansion of federal courthouses. Instead of reducing litigation, the system evolved into a bureaucratic empire focused on mediation and settlement, compromising transparency and constitutional rights while increasing costs and delays.

The $10 Billion Courtroom Con: How “ADR Reform” Built an Administrative Empire Read More
Campaigns / Judicial / Legislation / Politics

Maryland and Virginia Need Their Own TRUST Act: It’s Time to Pull Back the Curtain on Judicial Bias

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Texas has introduced the TRUST Act to enhance judicial transparency by requiring judges to disclose financial contributions from parties appearing in their courts. This initiative addresses concerns over bias due to political contributions, aiming to restore public confidence in the legal system. Maryland and Virginia should adopt similar measures to ensure fairness and accountability in their judiciary.

Maryland and Virginia Need Their Own TRUST Act: It’s Time to Pull Back the Curtain on Judicial Bias Read More
Government / Judges / Judicial / Laws / Legislation / Money and Finance

Maryland and Virginia Need Their Own TRUST Act: It’s Time to Pull Back the Curtain on Judicial Bias

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Texas’ TRUST Act mandates judges disclose campaign contributions and financial support from parties appearing in court, enhancing transparency and restoring public faith in the judicial system. Maryland and Virginia lack similar transparency measures, raising concerns about bias and favoritism. Introducing a TRUST Act in these states would promote fairness and accountability.

Maryland and Virginia Need Their Own TRUST Act: It’s Time to Pull Back the Curtain on Judicial Bias Read More