Home » Judges

Roberts’ Year-End Report: A Quiet Defense of Judicial Independence Ahead of America’s 250th Anniversary

In his 2025 Year-End Report, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. emphasizes judicial independence as essential to the Constitution, framing the judiciary as a counter-majoritarian check rooted in American history. He reflects on past principles rather than current controversies, reinforcing the judiciary’s role in upholding the rule of law amidst political strife.

Roberts’ Year-End Report: A Quiet Defense of Judicial Independence Ahead of America’s 250th Anniversary Read More

“Evidence, Not Ideology” — If Only the ABA Lived By Its Own Words

The American Bar Association (ABA) recently advocated for evidence-based justice while criticizing political influences. However, it faces accusations of selective outrage and inconsistency regarding its principles. The ABA’s historical silence on systemic injustices raises doubts about its commitment to neutrality. True reform requires the ABA to uphold its stated values across all cases.

“Evidence, Not Ideology” — If Only the ABA Lived By Its Own Words Read More

One Standard for Justice, Not Two: How Political Hypocrisy Mirrors Family Court Bias

Family courts, like our political system, suffer from a dangerous double standard. Fathers’ voices are too often dismissed, their evidence ignored, while mothers’ accusations are taken at face value. Just as the media excuses extremism from the left while condemning the right, family courts excuse obstruction by mothers while punishing fathers for even minor missteps. Until there is one consistent standard of justice, parents—and children—will continue to pay the price.

One Standard for Justice, Not Two: How Political Hypocrisy Mirrors Family Court Bias Read More

Judge Mandy Kimmons: Scribbled Orders, Broken Lives, and a Conveyor Belt to Jail

South Carolina family court Judge Mandy Kimmons is accused of misconduct, weaponizing her authority to impose contradictory orders that lead to unjust jail sentences for veterans and struggling parents. The complaints outline a pattern of negligence, abuse, and financial exploitation, revealing systemic failures that harm families and undermine justice.

Judge Mandy Kimmons: Scribbled Orders, Broken Lives, and a Conveyor Belt to Jail Read More

So You Want to Be a Maryland Magistrate? A Step-by-Step Guide to Letting Criminals Run Free

The content critiques the ease of becoming a magistrate in Maryland without a law degree or passing the bar exam. It highlights the absurdity of allowing unqualified individuals to make critical legal decisions, emphasizing the potential dangers of this system, where accountability is negligible and public safety is compromised.

So You Want to Be a Maryland Magistrate? A Step-by-Step Guide to Letting Criminals Run Free Read More

Maryland’s “No-Law-Degree-Required” Magistrates: Because Why Should Justice Require Actual Lawyers?

In Maryland, individuals without law degrees or bar licenses can become magistrates, thus wielding significant judicial power. This alarming practice allows untrained people to make critical decisions regarding violent offenders, compromising public safety. Such a system raises serious concerns about the qualifications required for roles that impact lives and communities.

Maryland’s “No-Law-Degree-Required” Magistrates: Because Why Should Justice Require Actual Lawyers? Read More

Should Judges Be Elected, Appointed, or Fired?

Custody court judges wield significant power over families, often shielded from accountability. While some are appointed and others elected, both models have pitfalls. Suggestions for reform include performance audits and parental review panels to improve transparency. Ultimately, the system must ensure judges are held accountable for their decisions affecting children’s lives.

Should Judges Be Elected, Appointed, or Fired? Read More

Why Are Judges So Protected From Public Accountability?

Judicial misconduct remains obscured by a veil of secrecy, allowing judges to evade accountability unlike police or teachers. This lack of transparency undermines public trust in the justice system. To restore integrity, reforms are needed, including public records of misconduct, independent oversight, and real consequences for violations, ensuring judges are held accountable.

Why Are Judges So Protected From Public Accountability? Read More

Why Do Courts Hate Due Process? And Why It’s So Hard for Family Court Litigants to Obtain

Family courts often disregard constitutional due process, prioritizing expediency over fairness. This environment fosters misconduct due to secrecy and lack of oversight. Litigants, usually self-represented, may struggle to assert their rights. To combat this, parents must document objections, use specific legal terminology, file motions, and consider appeals to ensure accountability.

Why Do Courts Hate Due Process? And Why It’s So Hard for Family Court Litigants to Obtain Read More