Home » Judges » Page 2

Maryland’s New Family Law Loophole: Erasing Parents Without Evidence

In Reichert v. Hornbeck, the Circuit Court has created a dangerous legal precedent by granting John H. Michel parental standing without any legal justification or consideration of the child’s wishes. This ruling threatens the rights of fit biological parents in Maryland, allowing judges to grant parental status to unrelated third parties arbitrarily.

Maryland’s New Family Law Loophole: Erasing Parents Without Evidence Read More

The Judge Who’s Missing: Why Family Courts Fail Without the Right Bench

The family court system is failing due to inadequate judges lacking neutrality, knowledge, and accountability. This leads to injustice, where truth is overlooked, and biases prevail. To reform the system, ongoing education for judges, public oversight, and independent accountability boards are essential. Justice for families is compromised until ideal judges are established.

The Judge Who’s Missing: Why Family Courts Fail Without the Right Bench Read More

Bleeding a Father Dry: The Orchestrated Financial Assault on William Sewell in South Carolina Family Court

William Sewell’s harrowing experience in South Carolina’s family court reveals a corrupt system exploiting vulnerable litigants for profit. Attorneys failed him, costs spiraled, and the Guardian ad Litem neglected his parental rights. Judge Mandy Kimmons enabled the exploitation, leading to financial ruin. The system, characterized as a racket, demands accountability and reform.

Bleeding a Father Dry: The Orchestrated Financial Assault on William Sewell in South Carolina Family Court Read More

When Justice Sleeps: What Happens When the Judge Doesn’t Read Your File

The article by Michael Phillips critiques the family court system, highlighting judges’ negligence in reviewing cases, leading to rubber-stamp rulings and biased decisions. It emphasizes the emotional toll on parents who feel unheard, calling for reforms like mandatory confirmation of document review and enhanced accountability to ensure fair hearings and justice in family courts.

When Justice Sleeps: What Happens When the Judge Doesn’t Read Your File Read More

Trojan Justice: How Turner v. Rogers Gutted Due Process and Smuggled ADR Into the 14th Amendment

In Turner v. Rogers, the Supreme Court prioritized administrative efficiency over due process, allowing child support enforcement without legal counsel or proper hearings. This ruling disguised as a protective measure paved the way for administrative control, redefining justice as procedural checklists, compromising parental rights, and undermining constitutional protections.

Trojan Justice: How Turner v. Rogers Gutted Due Process and Smuggled ADR Into the 14th Amendment Read More

The McMahon Machine: Where Feelings Are Felonies and Substack Is a Crime Scene

In Staten Island, free speech isn’t just under fire — it’s apparently a criminal offense. DA Mike McMahon, rattled by a Substack post that bruised his ego, is now treating satire like sabotage and dissent like a felony. If feelings are the new felony standard, we might need to build more jails — for writers, bloggers, and anyone with a spine. Welcome to McMahon’s America, where the Constitution takes a backseat to crybaby prosecution.

The McMahon Machine: Where Feelings Are Felonies and Substack Is a Crime Scene Read More

How Do You Trust a System That’s Designed to Break You? The Case for a RICO Investigation into Family Courts

Family courts are described as exploiting parents while purportedly acting in the child’s best interests. The system prioritizes profit over justice, as judges and attorneys operate within a self-serving network that undermines accountability. To address these issues, a federal investigation into family court practices and financial incentives is urgently needed.

How Do You Trust a System That’s Designed to Break You? The Case for a RICO Investigation into Family Courts Read More

The Ballad of Staten Island’s Fearless DA: Michael “Stranger Danger” McMahon

Michael E. McMahon, Staten Island’s District Attorney, wields power in a troubling legal environment marked by alleged misconduct. Claims of abuse, campaign fraud, and familial connections to the judiciary highlight a system where justice is compromised. McMahon’s actions raise questions about ethics, accountability, and the meaning of free speech in Staten Island politics.

The Ballad of Staten Island’s Fearless DA: Michael “Stranger Danger” McMahon Read More

The Fight After the Final Order: How South Carolina Courts Leave Pro Se Parents With No Way Out

William Sewell faces dire consequences following the Family Court of Dorchester County’s ruling granting custody of his daughter to his ex-wife, imposing significant financial burdens, and denying him legal representation. Despite these challenges, he pursues two post-judgment motions, arguing judicial bias and constitutional violations, determined to fight for his rights and child.

The Fight After the Final Order: How South Carolina Courts Leave Pro Se Parents With No Way Out Read More

The Evidence They Ignored: How Judge Maurice Williams Buried the Truth in Marc Fishman’s Case

Marc Fishman, exonerated by New York officials for child abuse allegations, faces potential jail time from Judge Maurice Williams despite exculpatory evidence being withheld. A supervised visit confirmed by a court-appointed supervisor supports Fishman’s innocence, highlighting issues in the judicial system that seem to silence evidence conflicting with prior rulings.

The Evidence They Ignored: How Judge Maurice Williams Buried the Truth in Marc Fishman’s Case Read More