The Missing Eyes in Family Court: How Lack of Transparency Jailed a Survivor

Family courts claim to protect children, but secrecy has turned them into weapons against the very parents who seek safety. In California, survivor Giselle Smiel cared for her children alone for five years—only to lose them to an abusive ex after missing one hearing during her son’s medical emergency. Now she sits in jail on six felony charges, without transcripts, without ADA accommodations, and without transparency. Her case proves what advocates like Renata DeMello have long warned: until the public can see inside family court, justice will remain out of reach.

The Missing Eyes in Family Court: How Lack of Transparency Jailed a Survivor Read More

They Locked Her Down, Then Shut Her Up: How San Diego Jails Punish Disabled Survivors

Giselle Smiel, a survivor of domestic violence, faced significant barriers to ADA Title II accommodations during her detention. Despite multiple requests, she lacked effective communication supports and experienced retaliation. The case highlights systemic failures in recognizing invisible disabilities and ensuring compliance, ultimately underscoring the need for accountability in custody settings.

They Locked Her Down, Then Shut Her Up: How San Diego Jails Punish Disabled Survivors Read More

California’s Family Courts Are Legal Abuse Factories

A protective mother fled Los Angeles to the San Diego area for safety and survival, only to be hunted down by law enforcement acting on the orders of the LA County DA. Now she sits in jail on half a million dollars bail, accused of “kidnapping” her own children. Her children are locked in foster detention, separated and traumatized. This is not justice—it is legal abuse, a California family court system run like a circus of lawless clowns in robes and badges.

California’s Family Courts Are Legal Abuse Factories Read More

California’s AB 495: A “Family Preparedness” Plan or a Backdoor Attack on Parental Rights?

California’s Assembly Bill 495 aims to provide care continuity for children when parents are unavailable but faces criticism for its vague language, which could enable unauthorized adults to make critical decisions for children without oversight. Critics argue it undermines parental rights and poses risks of exploitation, while supporters defend it as necessary for families in crisis.

California’s AB 495: A “Family Preparedness” Plan or a Backdoor Attack on Parental Rights? Read More

Double Dipping Isn’t Just Maryland’s Problem – The National Pattern of Replacing Parents While Still Charging Support

In Maryland, courts permit a “de facto father” to replace the biological parent while still enforcing child support obligations, highlighting a troubling trend in family courts nationwide. This practice benefits states financially, creating a system where parental rights are diminished yet financial obligations persist, often under the guise of the child’s best interests.

Double Dipping Isn’t Just Maryland’s Problem – The National Pattern of Replacing Parents While Still Charging Support Read More

Arrested for a Vacation: How Eleanor Leclair Ballester’s Case Exposes the Arbitrary and Broken American Family Court System

Eleanor Leclair Ballester’s arrest for taking her children on a vacation highlights flaws in the American family court system, characterized by selective enforcement and lack of constitutional protections. While Ballester faces severe legal repercussions, many abusive parents evade accountability, revealing a system more focused on control and revenue than justice.

Arrested for a Vacation: How Eleanor Leclair Ballester’s Case Exposes the Arbitrary and Broken American Family Court System Read More