They Locked Her Down, Then Shut Her Up: How San Diego Jails Punish Disabled Survivors

Giselle Smiel, a survivor of domestic violence, faced significant barriers to ADA Title II accommodations during her detention. Despite multiple requests, she lacked effective communication supports and experienced retaliation. The case highlights systemic failures in recognizing invisible disabilities and ensuring compliance, ultimately underscoring the need for accountability in custody settings.

They Locked Her Down, Then Shut Her Up: How San Diego Jails Punish Disabled Survivors Read More

How Do You Jail the Disabled Dad While the System Walks Free?

Marc Fishman, a Bronx disability rights advocate, faces a 45-day jail sentence tied to a convoluted legal battle with Westchester authorities, including wrongful arrest during supervised visitation with his son. His case raises concerns over due process, ADA violations, and judicial accountability, drawing national attention amid calls for emergency intervention before imprisonment.

How Do You Jail the Disabled Dad While the System Walks Free? Read More

Disability Discrimination and Cover-Ups: Westchester DA Joyce Miller’s Assault on Justice

In Westchester County, District Attorney Joyce Miller’s push for a five-year order of protection against Marc Fishman ignores exculpatory evidence and discriminates against disabled parents. Fishman claims this institutional abuse has caused unnecessary separation from his children, prompting a federal lawsuit to challenge the misconduct and advocate for accountability.

Disability Discrimination and Cover-Ups: Westchester DA Joyce Miller’s Assault on Justice Read More

The Blueprint of Family Court Abuse: Lessons from Reichert v. Hornbeck

In the family court system, the case of Reichert v. Hornbeck exemplifies a troubling trend where protective orders are misused, and parental rights are disregarded. This systemic abuse leads to unjust outcomes for fit parents and negatively impacts children. Reform is urgently needed to restore due process and constitutional protections.

The Blueprint of Family Court Abuse: Lessons from Reichert v. Hornbeck Read More

35 Years of the ADA: A Civil Rights Law in Name, Not in Practice

Next week marks 35 years since the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) was signed, yet many disabled Americans still face discrimination and unfulfilled promises. Both past and current administrations have failed to enforce ADA rights, leaving systemic issues unaddressed. Real change is needed beyond symbolic gestures to ensure equal treatment and accountability.

35 Years of the ADA: A Civil Rights Law in Name, Not in Practice Read More

When Police Lie on Reports: What Happened to Marc Fishman Could Happen to You

Marc Fishman’s life was devastated after a police officer falsely reported a violation of a protective order during a supervised visit with his son. Despite having evidence and supervision, Fishman was arrested, leading to unjust legal repercussions and estrangement from his children. This case highlights the dangers of reliance on flawed police narratives.

When Police Lie on Reports: What Happened to Marc Fishman Could Happen to You Read More

Justice Denied in Westchester: The Cruel Campaign Against Marc Fishman

Westchester County Family Court faces criticism over Judge Michelle Schauer’s handling of Marc Fishman’s case, who has not seen his children in five years due to alleged judicial overreach and ignored evidence of parental alienation. Despite adhering to court requirements, Fishman is denied accommodations, highlighting systemic issues and raising urgent calls for reform.

Justice Denied in Westchester: The Cruel Campaign Against Marc Fishman Read More

No Order, No Appeal: The Quiet Corruption of Judge-Shopping in Westchester Family Court

Marc Fishman, a disabled father, seeks a signed transfer order for his family court case after it was reassigned from Judge Burke to Judge Michelle Schauer without documentation. Despite multiple requests, the court has not provided clarity, raising concerns about judicial misconduct, ADA violations, and lack of due process for pro se litigants.

No Order, No Appeal: The Quiet Corruption of Judge-Shopping in Westchester Family Court Read More

The ADA Black Hole: How Judges Pretend Disability Rights Don’t Exist in America’s Courtrooms

The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) is often disregarded in U.S. courts, resulting in severe consequences for disabled litigants like Marc Fishman and Taran Nolan. Courts frequently deny or ignore ADA accommodations, causing emotional and legal chaos. This systemic issue necessitates enforcement, training, and accountability for judges to ensure equal justice.

The ADA Black Hole: How Judges Pretend Disability Rights Don’t Exist in America’s Courtrooms Read More

Supreme Court Lowers Barrier for Students with Disabilities to Sue Schools in Landmark A.J.T. v. Osseo Decision

On June 12, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in A.J.T. v. Osseo Area Schools that students with disabilities only need to establish “deliberate indifference” to sue schools for discrimination, instead of proving “bad faith or gross misjudgment.” This landmark decision enhances accountability and supports disability rights in education.

Supreme Court Lowers Barrier for Students with Disabilities to Sue Schools in Landmark A.J.T. v. Osseo Decision Read More