Home » Judicial Reform » Page 2

Tag: Judicial Reform
Accountability / Adr / Alternative Dispute Resolution / Child Custody / Child Support / Family Court / Family Court Reform / Father's Rights / Federal / Federal Funding / Government / Legal History / Locked Out of Justice / Money and Finance / Politics / Rights and Freedoms

Hijacked Justice: How Federal Funding Turned Family Court into a Profit Machine

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The family court system has undergone a deliberate transformation over decades, driven by federal funding that incentivizes revenue generation from private disputes. Laws like Title IV-D and PRWORA have turned courts into profit-driven entities, prioritizing efficiency over justice and resulting in systemic bias against noncustodial parents, primarily fathers.

Hijacked Justice: How Federal Funding Turned Family Court into a Profit Machine Read More
Adr / Alternative Dispute Resolution / Child Custody / Child Custody / Child Support / Child Support / Circuit Court / Civil Court / Court Corruption / Court Reform / Family Court / Family Court Reform / Government / Government / Government Corruption / Government Waste / Infrastructure / Politics

Courthouses Without Courts: How a $10 Billion Construction Boondoggle Laid the Bricks for ADR Tyranny

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The 1990s courthouse construction initiative, costing $10 billion, deviated from its intended purpose, evolving into a mismanaged project favoring bureaucratic control over judicial integrity. The oversight shifted decision-making away from judges to the Administrative Office, facilitating the rise of Alternative Dispute Resolution systems that undermine constitutional rights and transparency.

Courthouses Without Courts: How a $10 Billion Construction Boondoggle Laid the Bricks for ADR Tyranny Read More
Accountability / Child Custody / Child Custody / Child Support / Child Support / Family Court / Family Court Reform / Judicial / Laws / Legislation / Pennsylvania / State Lawmakers

OPINION: ⛔ Stop the Weaponization of Custody Court

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Pennsylvania House Bill 1412 aims to reform family law by requiring a “material change in circumstances” for custody modifications, addressing the issue of baseless petitions. While it offers relief from legal harassment and signals a shift towards child welfare, it does not adequately tackle false allegations or custody interference, indicating further reforms are needed.

OPINION: ⛔ Stop the Weaponization of Custody Court Read More
Judicial / Justice Denied: The Impeachment Files / Supreme Court / Supreme Court / Virginia / Washington, DC

Justice Denied: The Impeachment Files (Part 2)

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The American Inns of Court (AIC) operates as a private, powerful guild influencing the U.S. judiciary without public oversight or accountability. This secretive organization fosters bias and creates a legal caste system. Recent impeachment calls against Chief Justice Roberts have spotlighted these issues, raising concerns about fairness and transparency in the justice system.

Justice Denied: The Impeachment Files (Part 2) Read More
Ada Accommodations / Adr / Advocacy / Constitutional Law / Constitutional Rights / Corruption / Court Reform / Family Court / Judges / Legislation / New York / The Fishman Files

Where Is the Oversight? NY Legislators Stay Silent as Family Court Abuses Continue

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Marc Fishman, denied due process and access to his children, symbolizes systemic abuse in New York’s family courts, where judges act without accountability. Despite evidence of misconduct and legislators’ awareness, reforms remain unaddressed, resulting in suffering families. Immediate legislative action and oversight are essential to restore justice in the system.

Where Is the Oversight? NY Legislators Stay Silent as Family Court Abuses Continue Read More
Family Court / Government / Judicial / Laws / Legislation

Could a ‘Three Strikes’ Law for Custody Interference Pass in Maryland or Virginia?

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The Texas Senate’s passage of the “Three Strikes Law” aims to impose stricter penalties for custody interference. While Maryland’s courts favor cooperative parenting over accountability, advocates suggest a modified bill could emerge. Conversely, Virginia’s political landscape may support bipartisan child protection laws, potentially paving the way for similar measures.

Could a ‘Three Strikes’ Law for Custody Interference Pass in Maryland or Virginia? Read More
Accountability / Family Court / Legislation

Could a ‘Three Strikes’ Law for Custody Interference Pass in Maryland or Virginia?

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The Texas Senate passed Senate Bill 2794, enhancing penalties for repeated child custody interference, potentially categorizing the third offense as a felony. Discussion arises regarding the feasibility of similar laws in states like Maryland, with its progressive but lenient family court system, and Virginia, where bipartisan support for child protection is growing.

Could a ‘Three Strikes’ Law for Custody Interference Pass in Maryland or Virginia? Read More
Judicial / Overreach

Family Court: The Administrative State That’s Destroying Families

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

America’s family courts have shifted from judicial proceedings to administrative enforcement, compromising due process and parental rights over the last thirty years. Critics highlight the system’s financial incentives and lack of transparency. Despite signs of resistance, meaningful reform faces challenges as families continue to suffer under obscure processes lacking true justice safeguards.

Family Court: The Administrative State That’s Destroying Families Read More
Accountability / Broken Bench Series 1 / Government / Judges / Judicial / Legislation / Politics / Series / transparency / Voting

Broken Bench Series 1: The Silent Crisis of Judicial Appointments

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Virginia citizens have lost the right to elect judges, transforming judicial selection into a secretive system dominated by political insiders. This undermines accountability and democratic representation, with significant implications for civil rights and community health. A movement is growing to restore popular elections and empower citizens in judicial processes.

Broken Bench Series 1: The Silent Crisis of Judicial Appointments Read More
Congress / Government / Government Waste / Judicial

The $10 Billion Courtroom Con: How “ADR Reform” Built an Administrative Empire

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

In 1990, the Judicial Improvements Act aimed to streamline justice through Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), but resulted in an unprecedented expansion of federal courthouses. Instead of reducing litigation, the system evolved into a bureaucratic empire focused on mediation and settlement, compromising transparency and constitutional rights while increasing costs and delays.

The $10 Billion Courtroom Con: How “ADR Reform” Built an Administrative Empire Read More