Home » Series

Series
2 - Analysis / 2026 Election Cycle / 2026 Elections Cycle / California / Dead Reckoning / Elections / elections / Elections & Democracy / Maryland / Politics / Politics / Politics & Power

Two Coasts, One Ceiling

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Republican candidates Steve Hilton in California and Dan Cox in Maryland face significant polling deficits against their Democratic opponents. Both struggle to convert discontent with incumbents into voter support due to entrenched party identification. While Hilton attempts to distance himself from Trump’s influence, Cox’s strategy lacks the same proactive appeal, limiting his effectiveness.

Two Coasts, One Ceiling Read More
2 - Analysis / 2026 Election Cycle / 2026 Elections Cycle / elections / Elections / Elections & Democracy / Politics

USPS Finalizes New Mail-Ballot Tracking Rules — Now Voting Groups Want a Judge to Stop Them Again

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The U.S. Postal Service has finalized a rule regarding mail-in and absentee ballots for federal elections, requiring standardized preparation and tracking. This rule, which does not determine voter eligibility, faces legal challenges due to an existing injunction. The outcome may impact mail voting in the upcoming November midterms.

USPS Finalizes New Mail-Ballot Tracking Rules — Now Voting Groups Want a Judge to Stop Them Again Read More
4 - Cases / Anne Arundel County / Maryland / Maryland Watch / The Reichert Files / The Shadow Docket of Reichert v. Hornbeck / Uncategorized

When Parental Alienation Becomes Child Abuse, and No One Can Cite It

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The Appellate Court of Maryland issued an unreported opinion in Reichert v. Hornbeck, determining critical family law questions about mental abuse and custody. Despite extensive findings against Jeff Reichert’s parenting, the opinion’s unreported status limits its legal precedent, affecting future family law cases significantly regarding parental conduct and child custody evaluations.

When Parental Alienation Becomes Child Abuse, and No One Can Cite It Read More
3 - Investigations / California / California Watch / California's Broken Public Defense System / Child Custody / Child Custody / Family Court / Family Court Reform / Government / Institutions & Accountability / Mental Health / The Reyna Files

The Therapist the Court Ordered

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Dr. Rebecca Bailey, a family therapist, has faced numerous complaints regarding her controversial practice, Transitioning Families, which reunites families amid troubled custody disputes, often in abusive contexts. Critics claim her methods prioritize affluent parents, sidelining protective ones, while courts continue to endorse her, perpetuating a flawed system linked to a broader problematic industry.

The Therapist the Court Ordered Read More
3 - Investigations / 4 - Cases / California / California Watch / California's Broken Public Defense System / Criminal / Family Court / Family Court Reform / The Reyna Files

The Criminalist and the Coerced Plea

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Former criminalist Rhonda Reyna once testified for prosecutors in homicide cases. Years later, she says the same justice system ignored exculpatory evidence, pushed her into a no contest plea, and helped separate her from her daughter. Part one of Riptide’s investigation into California’s broken public defense system.

The Criminalist and the Coerced Plea Read More
3 - Investigations / 4 - Cases / Ada Accommodations / Beyond Barriers and Disability Rights / Brenna Gano Case / California / California Watch / Child Custody / Child Custody / Disability / Disability Rights / Disability Rights / Family Court / Family Court Reform / The California Custody Cartel

The Judge Who Wasn’t Ready

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Judge Vivian Wang, recently appointed with no family law experience, denied motions in a complex custody case involving alleged fraud and disability accommodations. Critics argue her procedural ruling lacked thorough legal analysis, particularly regarding limitations and equitable tolling. The upcoming trial may test her judicial capabilities and the fairness of the process.

The Judge Who Wasn’t Ready Read More
4 - Cases / Ada Accommodations / Beyond Barriers and Disability Rights / Court Corruption / Disability / Disability Rights / Disability Rights / Family Court / Family Court Reform / Federal Court / Institutions / Legal Reform / Maryland / Maryland Watch / The Reichert Files

Two Courts, Two Answers: How a Federal Accommodation Order Exposed the Anne Arundel Circuit Court’s ADA Defiance

- by Michael Phillips - 1 Comment

In January 2026, a federal magistrate granted Jeffrey Reichert remote ADA accommodations for pretrial hearings, while the Anne Arundel County Circuit Court repeatedly denied his requests, even barring him from future filings. This stark contrast raises questions about court compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and retaliation against disabled litigants.

Two Courts, Two Answers: How a Federal Accommodation Order Exposed the Anne Arundel Circuit Court’s ADA Defiance Read More
3 - Investigations / 4 - Cases / Brenna Gano Case / California / California Watch / Family Court / Family Court Reform / The California Custody Cartel

Court Denies Brenna Gano’s Motions — But Sets the Stage for Trial

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

A San Mateo judge rejected attempts by Brenna Gano to overturn a 2022 settlement, citing statute of limitations concerns. Gano argued she was coerced into the agreement without proper accommodations for her disabilities. While the denials were procedural, a full-day trial is set for December 28, 2026, where core issues will be examined.

Court Denies Brenna Gano’s Motions — But Sets the Stage for Trial Read More
3 - Investigations / 4 - Cases / Accountability / Ada Accommodations / Brenna Gano Case / California / California Watch / Child Custody / Child Custody / Court Corruption / Disability / Disability Rights / Disability Rights / Family Court / Family Court Reform / Government / Government Accountability / Institutions / Institutions & Accountability / parental rights / Parental Rights / The California Custody Cartel

The Gatekeeper

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Brenna Gano alleges that Samantha Esver-Poon, a Family Court Services counselor in San Mateo County, fabricated agreements and neglected evidence, leading to her estrangement from her son Jacob. Despite ongoing complaints, including violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act, Esver-Poon remains employed, and the county has yet to address the allegations.

The Gatekeeper Read More
3 - Investigations / 4 - Cases / Brenna Gano Case / California / California Watch / Child Custody / Child Custody / Family Court / Government / RICO/Racketeering / The California Custody Cartel

The San Mateo Syndicate

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

A document-driven investigation reveals how a tightly connected network of lawyers, therapists, and a private judge operated inside a single custody case—coordinating decisions, shaping evidence, and extracting more than $350,000 while independent advocacy became nearly impossible.

The San Mateo Syndicate Read More