Tag: judicial misconduct
Accountability / Child Custody / Child Custody / Court Reform / elections / Family Court / Family Court Reform / Judges / Judicial / Judicial Disability / parental rights / transparency

Should Judges Be Elected, Appointed, or Fired?

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Custody court judges wield significant power over families, often shielded from accountability. While some are appointed and others elected, both models have pitfalls. Suggestions for reform include performance audits and parental review panels to improve transparency. Ultimately, the system must ensure judges are held accountable for their decisions affecting children’s lives.

Should Judges Be Elected, Appointed, or Fired? Read More
Child Custody / Child Custody / Child Support / Child Support / Child Trafficking / Civil Rights / Corruption / Court Corruption / Court Of Ruin The William Sewell Files / Family Court / Family Court Reform / Father's Rights / Fraud / Government Corruption / Misconduct / parental rights / Rights and Freedoms / South Carolina / South Carolina Watch / The Corruption Series / Veterans

Justice in Name Only: Veterans Expose Abuse in Summerville and Dorchester Family Courts

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Two South Carolina veterans say they faced not justice, but systematic torture in Summerville and Dorchester family courts. William Sewell and Lee describe the same pattern: crushing fees, intimidation, and jail threats under Judge Mandy Kimmons and attorney Jason Wheeler. What should have been custody hearings became, in their words, an assembly line of punishment and profit. Their stories raise a chilling question: if men who once defended American freedom are now stripped of their own rights in family court, what does that say about the state of justice in South Carolina?

Justice in Name Only: Veterans Expose Abuse in Summerville and Dorchester Family Courts Read More
Child Custody / Child Custody / Divorce / Family Court / Legislation / Oversight / transparency

The Missing Eyes in Family Court: Why We Need Court Watchers, Cameras, and Remote Access

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Family courts in America lack transparency, harming parents and children due to unchecked judicial power. Introducing court watchers, cameras, and remote access can enhance accountability. These reforms ensure fair proceedings, document abuses, and extend oversight, thereby promoting justice. Advocates must push for legislation and partnerships to implement these crucial changes.

The Missing Eyes in Family Court: Why We Need Court Watchers, Cameras, and Remote Access Read More
bias / Child Custody / Child Custody / Child Support / Child Support / Constitutional Law / Constitutional Rights / Corruption / Court Corruption / Divorce / Due Process Denied / Family Court / Family Court Reform / Father's Rights / Judicial / Judicial Disability / Misconduct / parental rights / Rights and Freedoms / The Corruption Series

Why Family Court Judges Can Break the Law and Get Away With It

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Family courts, intended to serve justice, often operate beyond the law, relying on a vague standard of “best interests of the child.” Judges wield unchecked power, enjoying immunity from accountability. Parents face significant disadvantages, lacking essential rights during proceedings. Urgent reforms are needed to ensure fairness and transparency in family law.

Why Family Court Judges Can Break the Law and Get Away With It Read More
Corruption / Court Corruption / Family Court / Family Court Reform / Government Corruption / History / Legal History / Maryland / Maryland Watch / Misconduct / The Corruption Series

Maryland’s Long Shadow of Corruption: How History Shapes Distrust in Family Courts

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Maryland’s family courts face skepticism due to the state’s long history of corruption and scandals, particularly in Baltimore. This pervasive distrust is fueled by allegations of bias and financial exploitation in custody and divorce cases. While no definitive proof of corruption exists, the environment promotes suspicion that justice may be influenced by money and favoritism.

Maryland’s Long Shadow of Corruption: How History Shapes Distrust in Family Courts Read More
Accountability / Child Custody / Child Custody / Civil Rights / Constitutional Law / Constitutional Rights / Corruption / Court Corruption / Due Process Denied / Family Court / Family Court Reform / Father's Rights / Judges / Judicial / Judicial Disability / Misconduct / parental rights / Rights and Freedoms

Why Do Courts Hate Due Process? And Why It’s So Hard for Family Court Litigants to Obtain

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Family courts often disregard constitutional due process, prioritizing expediency over fairness. This environment fosters misconduct due to secrecy and lack of oversight. Litigants, usually self-represented, may struggle to assert their rights. To combat this, parents must document objections, use specific legal terminology, file motions, and consider appeals to ensure accountability.

Why Do Courts Hate Due Process? And Why It’s So Hard for Family Court Litigants to Obtain Read More
Accountability / bias / Child Custody / Child Custody / Child Support / Child Support / Corruption / Court Corruption / Divorce / Family Court / Family Court Reform / Father's Rights / Misconduct / parental rights

The Family Court System: Where Justice Goes to Die

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The family court system is designed to exploit vulnerable parents rather than deliver justice. Many enter with misguided beliefs about fairness, only to face manipulation and financial drain. High-conflict individuals often thrive while innocent parents suffer, resulting in emotional and financial devastation. The system needs abolition and replacement to truly protect children.

The Family Court System: Where Justice Goes to Die Read More
Accountability / Child Custody / Child Custody / Child Support / Child Support / Corruption / Court Corruption / Court Of Ruin The William Sewell Files / Family Court / Family Court Reform / Judicial / Misconduct / South Carolina / South Carolina Watch / The Corruption Series / transparency

Title IV-D: South Carolina’s Child Support “Incentive” Program or Judicial Slush Fund?

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The Title IV-D child support enforcement program, intended to aid families, is under scrutiny in South Carolina due to alleged misuse of funds by officials. Indictments against clerks for embezzlement highlight systemic issues, revealing a revenue-driven focus that undermines justice, disproportionately affecting low-income fathers and raising concerns about due process in child support cases.

Title IV-D: South Carolina’s Child Support “Incentive” Program or Judicial Slush Fund? Read More
Accountability / Advocacy / Attorneys / bias / Child Custody / Child Custody / Child Protective Services / Child Support / Child Support / Corruption / Court Corruption / Court Of Ruin The William Sewell Files / Family Court / Family Court Reform / Father's Rights / Government / Judicial Disability / Misconduct / parental rights / RICO/Racketeering / Rights and Freedoms / South Carolina / South Carolina Watch / State Legislators / The Corruption Series

“Pay Up or Shut Up”: How South Carolina’s Legal-Political Machine Silences Parents Like William Sewell

- by Michael Phillips - 1 Comment

William Sewell’s case in South Carolina highlights systemic failures in family court, revealing a punitive culture against parents exposing corruption. Legislator Gill Gatch’s remarks underscore a corrupt pay-to-play system, where speaking out leads to ostracization while silence necessitates financial submission, ultimately jeopardizing families and perpetuating injustices.

“Pay Up or Shut Up”: How South Carolina’s Legal-Political Machine Silences Parents Like William Sewell Read More
Accountability / Anne Arundel County / bias / California / California Watch / Child Custody / Child Custody / Child Support / Child Support / Corruption / Court Corruption / Family Court / Family Court Reform / Family Values / Father's Rights / Illinois / Judicial Disability / Maryland / Maryland Watch / Misconduct / parental rights / Texas / The Corruption Series / The Reichert Files

Double Dipping Isn’t Just Maryland’s Problem – The National Pattern of Replacing Parents While Still Charging Support

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

In Maryland, courts permit a “de facto father” to replace the biological parent while still enforcing child support obligations, highlighting a troubling trend in family courts nationwide. This practice benefits states financially, creating a system where parental rights are diminished yet financial obligations persist, often under the guise of the child’s best interests.

Double Dipping Isn’t Just Maryland’s Problem – The National Pattern of Replacing Parents While Still Charging Support Read More