Home » judicial bias » Page 2

Maryland’s Family Courts Are Failing Families: Here’s Why Reform Can’t Wait

Maryland’s family courts, intended to support families in crisis, have become burdensome and inefficient, often harming those they aim to protect. Overwhelmed by caseloads, biased practices, and financial barriers, these courts fail to prioritize children’s needs. Systemic reforms are necessary for accountability and transparency, urging public advocacy for meaningful change.

Maryland’s Family Courts Are Failing Families: Here’s Why Reform Can’t Wait Read More

The Final Order: How Judge Mandy Kimmons Sealed William Sewell’s Fate

The Sewell v. Sewell case highlights judicial bias and misconduct in a custody trial led by Judge Mandy Kimmons. The ruling benefited opposing attorney Donnie Gamache, disregarded William Sewell’s rights, and imposed unfair financial penalties. This case exemplifies systemic issues in family courts, necessitating immediate investigations and reforms to protect litigants’ rights.

The Final Order: How Judge Mandy Kimmons Sealed William Sewell’s Fate Read More

From the Bench to the Bully Pulpit: Judge Mandy Kimmons and the Breakdown of Impartiality in Sewell’s Trial

In South Carolina, Judge Mandy Kimmons allegedly failed to provide impartiality in a custody case, exhibiting bias and misconduct that compromised William Sewell’s right to a fair trial. Accounts reveal Kimmons’ hostility, procedural unfairness, and retaliation against Sewell, raising concerns about her adherence to judicial conduct standards and judicial integrity.

From the Bench to the Bully Pulpit: Judge Mandy Kimmons and the Breakdown of Impartiality in Sewell’s Trial Read More

Justice for Sale in the Palmetto State: The ‘Baby Veronica’ Case and South Carolina’s Broken Custody System

The Baby Veronica case exemplifies the flaws in South Carolina’s family court system, prioritizing profit over justice. Dusten Brown’s fight for his daughter was undermined by legal technicalities and systemic bias against Native fathers. The ruling eroded parental rights, highlighting the need for reforms to uphold fatherly rights and enforce fair adoption practices.

Justice for Sale in the Palmetto State: The ‘Baby Veronica’ Case and South Carolina’s Broken Custody System Read More

The Double Standard of Family Court: Enforcing Support, Ignoring Custody

On June 30, 2025, Maryland’s Supreme Court ruled that child support cannot be waived as it is a child’s right. This decision highlights a disparity where financial support is enforced rigorously, while custody and visitation rights for parents, particularly fathers, are often disregarded. Calls for reform emphasize equal treatment for both rights.

The Double Standard of Family Court: Enforcing Support, Ignoring Custody Read More

The Summerville Syndicate: How a South Carolina Family Court Became a Playground for Power, Profit, and Persecution

Families in South Carolina allege systemic abuse within the family court system, implicating judges and attorneys like Mandy Kimmons and Donnie Gamache in racketeering. Whistleblowers describe coercion, financial exploitation, and collusion among legal and political insiders, raising calls for federal intervention to address these disturbing patterns of misconduct and silence.

The Summerville Syndicate: How a South Carolina Family Court Became a Playground for Power, Profit, and Persecution Read More

The Untouchable Robe: How Judge Susan Capeci’s Decisions Have Harmed Families, Sparked Outrage, and Escaped Accountability

Judge Susan M. Capeci has faced repeated criticism for her purported bias in court decisions, especially in cases involving domestic violence and child custody. Her rulings have led to allegations of judicial misconduct, wrongful removal of children, and denial of due process for litigants, raising significant concerns about her impact on families and justice.

The Untouchable Robe: How Judge Susan Capeci’s Decisions Have Harmed Families, Sparked Outrage, and Escaped Accountability Read More

I Haven’t Met Taran Nolan. But I Know Injustice When I See It.

Michael Phillips shares the story of Taran Nolan, a quadriplegic mother and trauma survivor facing systemic injustice in family court. Denied accommodations and labeled unstable for her emotional expressions, Taran’s struggle highlights a broader issue where disabled and traumatized parents are stripped of their rights, treated as problems rather than individuals deserving support.

I Haven’t Met Taran Nolan. But I Know Injustice When I See It. Read More

Judicial Injustice in Suburbia: How Judge Bibi Berry and Montgomery County Family Court Became Every Father’s Worst Nightmare

Montgomery County, Maryland faces allegations of bias and misconduct within its family court, primarily involving Judge Bibi Berry. Fathers describe a hostile environment where due process is lacking, and their voices are ignored. Calls for oversight and possible impeachment of Berry are increasing as the judicial culture is seen as damaging to families and children.

Judicial Injustice in Suburbia: How Judge Bibi Berry and Montgomery County Family Court Became Every Father’s Worst Nightmare Read More

When Four Seconds Define a Father: What the Family Court System Refuses to See

This article reveals the struggles of fathers navigating the family court system, highlighting their emotional trauma as they fight for their children amidst systemic bias. One father’s experience illustrates the psychological warfare they face, often being treated unfairly while their love and efforts are dismissed. The piece offers coping strategies and emphasizes the importance of resilience.

When Four Seconds Define a Father: What the Family Court System Refuses to See Read More