Home » judicial bias » Page 3

Tag: judicial bias

Advocacy / Attorneys / Child Custody / Corruption / Court Of Ruin The William Sewell Files / Court Reform / Family Court / South Carolina

The Fixer: Donnie Gamache and the Family Court Cartel

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

In South Carolina’s family court system, attorney Donnie Gamache allegedly manipulates the legal process for personal gain, creating an environment of fear and corruption. William Sewell’s case illustrates a network of collusion where judges and lawyers protect one another, resulting in unjust outcomes and damaged lives. Calls for accountability are growing.

The Fixer: Donnie Gamache and the Family Court Cartel Read More
Anne Arundel County / Baltimore City / Baltimore County / Civil Rights / Crime Violence / Family Court / The Reichert Files

Who Is Sarah Hornbeck? The Woman at the Center of One of Maryland’s Most Disturbing Custody Cases

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

The case of Sarah Hornbeck highlights a troubling family court situation in Maryland where her diagnosed Borderline Personality Disorder and abusive behavior have been ignored, allowing her to maintain custody of her son, Grant. Despite expert evaluations revealing significant mental health issues, the court system has failed to act, endangering both mother and child.

Who Is Sarah Hornbeck? The Woman at the Center of One of Maryland’s Most Disturbing Custody Cases Read More
Child Custody / Corruption / Court Of Ruin The William Sewell Files / Court Reform / Family Court / Judicial Disability / South Carolina / Uncategorized

No Counsel, No Help, No Justice: What Happens When the Family Court System Targets the Poor

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

William Sewell’s story highlights systemic failures in family courts that disadvantage poor parents. Denied legal aid and faced with ineffective representation, he experienced retaliation when seeking help. This reflects a broader issue where low-income individuals are punished for asserting their rights, revealing a need for significant reforms in the legal system.

No Counsel, No Help, No Justice: What Happens When the Family Court System Targets the Poor Read More
Anne Arundel County / Family Court / Judges / Mental Health / The Reichert Files

The Pain That Never Ends: The Invisible Grief of Alienated Parents

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Parental alienation is a profound, unhealed grief for loving parents separated from their children by a flawed legal system. Despite evidence and devotion, courts often favor bias and false claims over compassion, leading to lasting emotional harm. This systemic failure produces fatherless homes, damaging families and perpetuating suffering.

The Pain That Never Ends: The Invisible Grief of Alienated Parents Read More
Adr / Advocacy / Constitutional Rights / Court Reform / Family Court / New York / The Fishman Files / Uncategorized

Paralyzed by Procedure: How Family Court Turns Technicalities Into Injustice

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Family court in New York often prioritizes procedural technicalities over truth, resulting in devastating consequences for parents like Marc Fishman, who struggles for access to his children due to bureaucratic failures. The system frequently dismisses claims based on flawed processes, not factual inaccuracies, highlighting an urgent need for reform to restore fair access to justice.

Paralyzed by Procedure: How Family Court Turns Technicalities Into Injustice Read More
Family Court / Judges / New York / The Fishman Files

A Father in Court Alone: The High-Stakes Struggle of Marc Fishman

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

On April 28, 2025, Marc Fishman, fighting parental alienation and suspended visitation rights in a New York courtroom, faced significant challenges: no attorney, unreceived filings, and a judge potentially biased against him. His struggle highlights flaws in the family court system, which prioritizes procedure over the welfare of vulnerable parents and children.

A Father in Court Alone: The High-Stakes Struggle of Marc Fishman Read More
Campaigns / Judicial / Legislation / Politics

Maryland and Virginia Need Their Own TRUST Act: It’s Time to Pull Back the Curtain on Judicial Bias

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Texas has introduced the TRUST Act to enhance judicial transparency by requiring judges to disclose financial contributions from parties appearing in their courts. This initiative addresses concerns over bias due to political contributions, aiming to restore public confidence in the legal system. Maryland and Virginia should adopt similar measures to ensure fairness and accountability in their judiciary.

Maryland and Virginia Need Their Own TRUST Act: It’s Time to Pull Back the Curtain on Judicial Bias Read More
Government / Judges / Judicial / Laws / Legislation / Money and Finance

Maryland and Virginia Need Their Own TRUST Act: It’s Time to Pull Back the Curtain on Judicial Bias

- by Michael Phillips - Leave a Comment

Texas’ TRUST Act mandates judges disclose campaign contributions and financial support from parties appearing in court, enhancing transparency and restoring public faith in the judicial system. Maryland and Virginia lack similar transparency measures, raising concerns about bias and favoritism. Introducing a TRUST Act in these states would promote fairness and accountability.

Maryland and Virginia Need Their Own TRUST Act: It’s Time to Pull Back the Curtain on Judicial Bias Read More